The substitution method

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Tait
Keyword(s):  
Free Variable ◽  
Order System ◽  
Conservative Extension ◽  
Substitution Method ◽  
Recursive Definition ◽  
First Order ◽  
Variable Elimination ◽  
Primitive Recursion ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Primitive Recursive

This paper deals with Hilbert's substitution method for eliminating bound variables from first order proofs. With a first order system S framed in the ε-calculus [2] the problem is to associate a system S' without bound variables and an effective procedure for transforming derivations in S into derivations in S′. The transform of a formula A derived in S is to be an “ε-substitution instance” of A, i.e. it is obtained by replacing terms εxB(x) in A by terms of S′. In general the choice of these terms will depend on the particular derivation of A, and not on A alone. Cf. [4]. The present formulation sharpens Hilbert's original statement of the problem, i.e. that the transform of A should be finitistically verifiable, by making explicit the methods of verification used, namely those formalized in S′; on the other hand, it generalizes Hilbert's formulation since S′ need not be restricted to finitist systems.The bound variable elimination procedure can always be taken to be primitive recursive in (the Gödel number of) the derivation of A. Constructions which transcend primitive recursion can simply be built into S′.In this paper we show that if S′ is taken to be a second order system with constants for functionals, then the existence of suitable ε-substitution instances can be expressed by the solvability of certain functional equations in S′. We deal with two cases here. If S is number theory without induction, i.e. essentially predicate calculus with identity, then we can solve the equations in question by taking for S′ the free variable part S* of S with an added rule of definition of functionals by cases (recursive definition on finite ordinals), which is a conservative extension of S*.

Frege proof system and TNC°

1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 709-738
Author(s):  
Gaisi Takeuti
Keyword(s):  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Free Variable ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Order System ◽  
Equational Logic ◽  
Separation Problem ◽  
Conservative Extension ◽  
First Order ◽  
Polynomial Size ◽  
Extension Axiom

A Frege proof systemFis any standard system of prepositional calculus, e.g., a Hilbert style system based on finitely many axiom schemes and inference rules. An Extended Frege systemEFis obtained fromFas follows. AnEF-sequence is a sequence of formulas ψ1, …, ψκsuch that eachψiis either an axiom ofF, inferred from previous ψuand ψv(= ψu→ ψi) by modus ponens or of the formq↔ φ, whereqis an atom occurring neither in φ nor in any of ψ1,…,ψi−1. Suchq↔ φ, is called an extension axiom andqa new extension atom. AnEF-proof is anyEF-sequence whose last formula does not contain any extension atom. In [12], S. A. Cook and R. Reckhow proved that the pigeonhole principlePHPhas a simple polynomial sizeEF-proof and conjectured thatPHPdoes not admit polynomial sizeF-proof. In [5], S. R. Buss refuted this conjecture by furnishing polynomial sizeF-proof forPHP. Since then the important separation problem of polynomial sizeFand polynomial sizeEFhas not shown any progress.In [11], S. A. Cook introduced the systemPV, a free variable equational logic whose provable functional equalities are ‘polynomial time verifiable’ and showed that the metamathematics ofFandEFcan be developed inPVand the soundness ofEFproved inPV. In [3], S. R. Buss introduced the first order systemand showed thatis essentially a conservative extension ofPV. There he also introduced a second order system(BD).

Functionals defined by transfinite recursion

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Tait
Keyword(s):  
Functional Equations ◽  
Partial Ordering ◽  
Closure Properties ◽  
Primitive Recursive Arithmetic ◽  
Primitive Recursion ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Second Order Systems ◽  
Transfinite Recursion ◽  
Primitive Recursive ◽  
Elementary Closure

This paper deals mainly with quantifier-free second order systems (i.e., with free variables for numbers and functions, and constants for numbers, functions, and functionals) whose basic rules are those of primitive recursive arithmetic together with definition of functionals by primitive recursion and explicit definition. Precise descriptions are given in §2. The additional rules have the form of definition by transfinite recursion up to some ordinal ξ (where ξ is represented by a primitive recursive (p.r.) ordering). In §3 we discuss some elementary closure properties (under rules of inference and definition) of systems with recursion up to ξ. Let Rξ denote (temporarily) the system with recursion up to ξ. The main results of this paper are of two sorts:Sections 5–7 are concerned with less elementary closure properties of the systems Rξ. Namely, we show that certain classes of functional equations in Rη can be solved in Rη for some explicitly determined η < ε(η) (the least ε-number > ξ). The classes of functional equations considered all have roughly the form of definition by recursion on the partial ordering of unsecured sequences of a given functional F, or on some ordering which is obtained from this by simple ordinal operations. The key lemma (Theorem 1) needed for the reduction of these equations to transfinite recursion is simply a sharpening of the Brouwer-Kleene idea.

Ordinal bounds for κ-consistency

1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren D. Goldfarb
Keyword(s):  
Nonnegative Integer ◽  
Transfinite Induction ◽  
Axiom Schema ◽  
First Order ◽  
Order Arithmetic ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Primitive Recursive

In [1] the ω-consistency of arithmetic was proved by a method which yields fine ordinal bounds for κ-consistency, κ ≥ 1. In this paper these bounds are shown to be best possible. The ω-consistency of a number-theoretic system S can be expressed thus: for all sentences ∃xM,where ProvS is the proof predicate for S, if n is a nonnegative integer then n is the formal numeral (of S) for n, and if G is a formula then ˹G˺ is the Gödel number of G. The κ-consistency of S is the restriction of (1) to Σκ0 sentences ∃xM. The proof in [1] establishes the no-counterexample interpretation of (1), that is, the existence of a constructive functional Φ such that, for all sentences ∃xM, all numbers p, and all functions f,(see [1, §2]). A functional Φ is an ω-consistency functional for S if it satisfies (2) for all sentences ∃xM, and a κ-consistency functional for S if it satisfies (2) for all Σκ0 sentences ∃xM.The systems considered in [1] are those obtained from classical first-order arithmetic Z, including the schema for definition of primitive recursive (p.r.) functions, by adjoining, for some p.r. well-founded ordering ≺ of the nonnegative integers, the axiom schemathat is, the least number principle on ≺; it is equivalent to the schema of transfinite induction on ≺.

On the rules of proof in the pure functional calculus of the first order

1951 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Mostowski
Keyword(s):  
Functional Calculus ◽  
Free Variable ◽  
Propositional Function ◽  
Cartesian Power ◽  
First Order ◽  
A Value ◽  
Free Variables ◽  
Individual Variables ◽  
Definition Of

We consider here the pure functional calculus of first order as formulated by Church.Church, l.c., p. 79, gives the definition of the validity of a formula in a given set I of individuals and shows that a formula is provable in if and only if it is valid in every non-empty set I. The definition of validity is preceded by the definition of a value of a formula; the notion of a value is the basic “semantical” notion in terms of which all other semantical notions are definable.The notion of a value of a formula retains its meaning also in the case when the set I is empty. We have only to remember that if I is empty, then an m-ary propositional function (i.e. a function from the m-th cartesian power Im to the set {f, t}) is the empty set. It then follows easily that the value of each well-formed formula with free individual variables is the empty set. The values of wffs without free variables are on the contrary either f or t. Indeed, if B has the unique free variable c and ϕ is the value of B, then the value of (c)B according to the definition given by Church is the propositional constant f or t according as ϕ(j) is f for at least one j in I or not. Since, however, there is no j in I, the condition ϕ(j) = t for all j in I is vacuously satisfied and hence the value of (c)B is t.

On the No-Counterexample Interpretation

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1491-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Kohlenbach
Keyword(s):  
Normal Form ◽  
Formal System ◽  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Peano Arithmetic ◽  
Order Type ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Substitution Method ◽  
Functional Interpretation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractIn [15], [16] G. Kreisel introduced the no-counterexample interpretation (n.c.i.) of Peano arithmetic. In particular he proved, using a complicated ε-substitution method (due to W. Ackermann), that for every theorem A (A prenex) of first-order Peano arithmetic PA one can find ordinal recursive functionals of order type < ε0 which realize the Herbrand normal form AH of A.Subsequently more perspicuous proofs of this fact via functional interpretation (combined with normalization) and cut-elimination were found. These proofs however do not carry out the no-counterexample interpretation as a local proof interpretation and don't respect the modus ponens on the level of the nocounterexample interpretation of formulas A and A → B. Closely related to this phenomenon is the fact that both proofs do not establish the condition (δ) and—at least not constructively—(γ) which are part of the definition of an ‘interpretation of a formal system’ as formulated in [15].

A hierarchy for the 1-section of any type two object

1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Wainer
Keyword(s):  
Affirmative Answer ◽  
The Other ◽  
Uniqueness Property ◽  
Hyperarithmetical Hierarchy ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Primitive Recursion ◽  
Ordinal Notations ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Primitive Recursive

Shoenfield [6] constructed a hierarchy for any type two object F in which 2E is recursive by generalizing the hyperarithmetical hierarchy, using a jump operation jF defined by(A similar hierarchy was constructed independently by Hinman [3].) In order to construct a hierarchy for an arbitrary type two F we must first associate with F an operator which, on one hand will always be recursive in F, and on the other hand will generate all the functions recursive in F when iterated over a simultaneously generated set of ordinal notations OF. Clearly the use of 2E in the above definition of jF(f) can be avoided if, instead of diagonalizing F over all functions recursive in f, we only diagonalize F over, say, the functions primitive recursive in f. If furthermore we code in a function which enumerates all functions primitive recursive in f then the resulting operation will certainly generate a primitive recursively expanding hierarchy of functions recursive in F. The problem that remains is whether this hierarchy will exhaust the 1-section of F. But this reduces to an effectiyized version of the following problem: If g is recursive in some level of the hierarchy, is g primitive recursive in some higher level ? An affirmative answer is suggested by the completeness results of Feferman [2], and our main theorem below will be proved by combining his ideas with those of Shoenfield [6]. The result is a hierarchy which applies to all type two objects, and which replaces the notion of recursion in F by the simpler notion of primitive recursion in certain functions generated by F. Unfortunately, in contrast with the Shoenfield hierarchy, the hierarchy developed here cannot always be expected to have the uniqueness property (even w.r.t. ≤T), and for this reason the proof of our main theorem is rather more complicated than the corresponding proof in [6].

An Adjustment of Reference Tracking PID Controllers for a First-order System with a Dead Time

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. 676-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ishimura ◽  
Masayoshi Nakamoto ◽  
Takuya Kinoshita ◽  
Toru Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Dead Time ◽  
Order System ◽  
Pid Controllers ◽  
Reference Tracking ◽  
First Order

Relativized realizability in intuitionistic arithmetic of all finite types

1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas D. Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Extension Theorem ◽  
General Notion ◽  
Conservative Extension ◽  
First Order ◽  
New Information ◽  
Reflection Theorem ◽  
Order Arithmetic ◽  
Special Case ◽  
Dependent Choice ◽  
Intuitionistic Arithmetic

In this paper we introduce a new notion of realizability for intuitionistic arithmetic in all finite types. The notion seems to us to capture some of the intuition underlying both the recursive realizability of Kjeene [5] and the semantics of Kripke [7]. After some preliminaries of a syntactic and recursion-theoretic character in §1, we motivate and define our notion of realizability in §2. In §3 we prove a soundness theorem, and in §4 we apply that theorem to obtain new information about provability in some extensions of intuitionistic arithmetic in all finite types. In §5 we consider a special case of our general notion and prove a kind of reflection theorem for it. Finally, in §6, we consider a formalized version of our realizability notion and use it to give a new proof of the conservative extension theorem discussed in Goodman and Myhill [4] and proved in our [3]. (Apparently, a form of this result is also proved in Mine [13]. We have not seen this paper, but are relying on [12].) As a corollary, we obtain the following somewhat strengthened result: Let Σ be any extension of first-order intuitionistic arithmetic (HA) formalized in the language of HA. Let Σω be the theory obtained from Σ by adding functionals of finite type with intuitionistic logic, intensional identity, and axioms of choice and dependent choice at all types. Then Σω is a conservative extension of Σ. An interesting example of this theorem is obtained by taking Σ to be classical first-order arithmetic.

scholarly journals Off-Shell Noether Currents and Potentials for First-Order General Relativity

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Merced Montesinos ◽  
Diego Gonzalez ◽  
Rodrigo Romero ◽  
Mariano Celada
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Vector Fields ◽  
Killing Vector ◽  
Spherically Symmetric ◽  
Killing Vector Fields ◽  
Arbitrary Vector ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
First Order ◽  
Direct Form ◽  
Definition Of

We report off-shell Noether currents obtained from off-shell Noether potentials for first-order general relativity described by n-dimensional Palatini and Holst Lagrangians including the cosmological constant. These off-shell currents and potentials are achieved by using the corresponding Lagrangian and the off-shell Noether identities satisfied by diffeomorphisms generated by arbitrary vector fields, local SO(n) or SO(n−1,1) transformations, ‘improved diffeomorphisms’, and the ‘generalization of local translations’ of the orthonormal frame and the connection. A remarkable aspect of our approach is that we do not use Noether’s theorem in its direct form. By construction, the currents are off-shell conserved and lead naturally to the definition of off-shell Noether charges. We also study what we call the ‘half off-shell’ case for both Palatini and Holst Lagrangians. In particular, we find that the resulting diffeomorphism and local SO(3,1) or SO(4) off-shell Noether currents and potentials for the Holst Lagrangian generically depend on the Immirzi parameter, which holds even in the ‘half off-shell’ and on-shell cases. We also study Killing vector fields in the ‘half off-shell’ and on-shell cases. The current theoretical framework is illustrated for the ‘half off-shell’ case in static spherically symmetric and Friedmann–Lemaitre–Robertson–Walker spacetimes in four dimensions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document