Developmental Correlates of Genome Size in Plethodontid Salamanders and Their Implications for Genome Evolution

Evolution ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley K. Sessions ◽  
Allan Larson
Genome ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E Vinogradov

At a certain temperature, which is a compromise for temperatures at which the species are adapted, the relationship between genome size and cell cycle duration during synchronous cleavage divisions can be very strong (r = 1.00, P < 0.01) in four closely related frogs, suggesting a functional dependence.Key words: genome size, genome evolution, genome cytoecology, noncoding DNA, cell cycle duration.


Genome ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E. Newman ◽  
T. Ryan Gregory ◽  
Christopher C. Austin

The genus Plethodon is the most species-rich salamander genus in North America, and nearly half of its species face an uncertain future. It is also one of the most diverse families in terms of genome sizes, which range from 1C = 18.2 to 69.3 pg, or 5–20 times larger than the human genome. Large genome size in salamanders results in part from accumulation of transposable elements and is associated with various developmental and physiological traits. However, genome sizes have been reported for only 25% of the species of Plethodon (14 of 55). We collected genome size data for Plethodon serratus to supplement an ongoing phylogeographic study, reconstructed the evolutionary history of genome size in Plethodontidae, and inferred probable genome sizes for the 41 species missing empirical data. Results revealed multiple genome size changes in Plethodon: genomes of western Plethodon increased, whereas genomes of eastern Plethodon decreased, followed by additional decreases or subsequent increases. The estimated genome size of P. serratus was 21 pg. New understanding of variation in genome size evolution, along with genome size inferences for previously unstudied taxa, provide a foundation for future studies on the biology of plethodontid salamanders.


Genome ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E Vinogradov

The terrestrial pulmonate mollusks were found to have the significantly larger genomes than the aquatic pulmonates. Being shown in the independent phylogenetic branch, this phenomenon suggests that the previously observed genome enlargement in the vertebrate land pioneers (amphibians and lungfishes) was not casual. As in the vertebrates, the larger molluskan genomes are also more GC-rich. Key words: genome size, genome evolution, cytoecology, noncoding DNA, genome base composition, flow cytometry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. R1083-R1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel A.B. Marais ◽  
Bérénice Batut ◽  
Vincent Daubin

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itamar Sela ◽  
Yuri I. Wolf ◽  
Eugene V. Koonin

AbstractThe genomes of bacteria and archaea evolve by extensive loss and gain of genes which, for any group of related prokaryotic genomes, result in the formation of a pangenome with the universal, asymmetrical U-shaped distribution of gene commonality. To elucidate the evolutionary factors that define the specific shape of this distribution, we investigate the fit of simple models of genome evolution to the empirically observed gene commonality distributions and genomes intersections for 33 groups of closely related bacterial genomes. The combined analysis of genome intersections and gene commonality shows that at least one of the two simplifying assumptions that are usually adopted for modeling the evolution of the U-shaped distribution, those of infinitely many genes and constant genome size, is invalid. The violation of both these assumptions stems from the horizontal gene transfer barrier, i.e. the cost of accommodation of foreign genes by prokaryotes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 210 (3) ◽  
pp. 1072-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Clark ◽  
Oriane Hidalgo ◽  
Jaume Pellicer ◽  
Hongmei Liu ◽  
Jeannine Marquardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siri Kellner ◽  
Anja Spang ◽  
Pierre Offre ◽  
Gergely J. Szöllősi ◽  
Celine Petitjean ◽  
...  

What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes also apply to the archaeal domain. Although Bacteria and Archaea share a common prokaryotic genome architecture, the extant diversity of Bacteria appears to be much higher than that of Archaea. Compared with Archaea, Bacteria also show much greater genome-level specialisation to specific ecological niches, including parasitism and endosymbiosis. The reasons for these differences in long-term diversification rates are unclear, but might be related to fundamental differences in informational processing machineries and cell biological features that may favour archaeal diversification in harsher or more energy-limited environments. Finally, phylogenomic analyses suggest that the first Archaea were anaerobic autotrophs that evolved on the early Earth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document