Genetic Structure among Subpopulations of the Eastern Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris)

1996 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle D. Boone ◽  
Olin E. Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Structure ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Wild Turkey ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo Silvestris ◽  
Eastern Wild Turkey

Oxyspirura turcottei n.sp. (Nematoda: Thelaziidae) from the eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris)

1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 1218-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward M. Addison ◽  
Annie K. Prestwood
Keyword(s):  
West Virginia ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Buccal Capsule ◽  
Wild Turkey ◽  
Nictitating Membrane ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo Silvestris ◽  
Eastern Wild Turkey

Oxyspirura turcottei n.sp. from beneath the nictitating membrane of Meleagris gallopavo silvestris of West Virginia is distinguished from other species of the subgenus Oxyspirura (undivided buccal capsule) by its size (males 9.8–13.8 mm long; females 9.6–17.7 mm long), the presence and morphology of the gubernaculum, the presence of three pairs of preanal papillae, no adanal papillae and three pairs of postanal papillae in most specimens, and by its long right and left spicules (215–245 μm and 495–615 μm, respectively).

scholarly journals Wild Turkey, Meleagris gallopavo silvestris, Behavior in Central Ontario During Winter

2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linh P. Nguyen ◽  
Josef Hamr ◽  
Glenn H. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Home Range ◽  
Site Selection ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Tree Height ◽  
Home Range Size ◽  
Range Size ◽  
Wild Turkey ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo Silvestris ◽  
Winter Food ◽  
Eastern Wild Turkey

Home range size, food habits, and roost site selection are described for the Eastern Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) introduced on the Precambrian Shield in central Ontario during the winters 1999 and 2000. Monthly home range size was correlated primarily to snow depth, although it was also likely associated to other factors, including food availability and/or roost site availability. Ferns and allies were used more than available, whereas monocots were used less than expected. Roost site-selection was primarily influenced by tree height. If the Eastern Wild Turkey is to expand its northern range in Ontario, winter food and roost site availability may be the primary determinants for successful introductions.

Photographic Records Confirming the Presence of Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo ssp.) in the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve of Guanajuato, Mexico

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 587
Author(s):  
Manuel Rangel-Rojas ◽  
Juan F. Charre-Medellín ◽  
Tiberio C. Monterrubio-Rico ◽  
Gloria Magaña-Cota ◽  
José S. Contreras-Robledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Biosphere Reserve ◽  
Wild Turkey ◽  
Photographic Records

Density-Dependent Harvest Modeling for the Eastern Wild Turkey

2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay D. McGhee ◽  
Jim Berkson ◽  
David E. Steffen ◽  
Gary W. Norman
Keyword(s):  
Wild Turkey ◽  
Density Dependent ◽  
Eastern Wild Turkey

Survival and cause-specific mortality of the female eastern wild turkey at its northern range edge

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britney Niedzielski ◽  
Jeff Bowman
Keyword(s):  
Management Strategies ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Wild Turkey ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
Supplemental Food ◽  
Range Edge ◽  
The North ◽  
Wild Turkeys ◽  
Peripheral Areas

Context In an era of rapid environmental change, many species are shifting their distributions. As temperate-zone species’ expand their ranges north, different and potentially severe limiting factors may begin to affect their ability to survive and reproduce. The wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) is one example of a species undergoing rapid northern expansion. Aims An improved understanding of wild turkey demography at the species’ northern range periphery would facilitate effective management of this important game species. Therefore, we undertook a study to evaluate survival, causes of mortality, and behavioural strategies that may govern survival of female wild turkeys. Methods We captured 53 female wild turkeys, and used backpack transmitters to monitor their individual fates during 2012–13. Key results The annual survival estimate was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.25–0.55), with the lowest seasonal survival in the winter. The most frequent cause of mortality was mammalian predation, predominately by coyotes (Canis latrans). Age, proximity to supplemental food, and habitat use did not affect risk of mortality. Conclusions Northern wild turkeys in our study exhibited lower survival and suffered higher predation than did populations in the species’ historic range. Despite our findings, the wild turkey has expanded its range northwards and continues to exist in these peripheral areas. This may be due to high productivity or a source–sink dynamic, whereby high mortality is offset by immigration from the south. Implications The low survival and high predation of wild turkeys in the north must be considered when developing management strategies, particularly if interest exists in translocating turkeys farther north. Further research is needed to better understand whether northern turkey populations persist as sinks.

Wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) detectability from helicopters and ramifications for estimating abundance

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Butler ◽  
Warren B. Ballard ◽  
Mark C. Wallace ◽  
Stephen J. DeMaso
Keyword(s):  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Wild Turkey
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document