Constructing ω-stable structures: rank 2 fields

2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 371-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Baldwin ◽  
Kitty Holland

AbstractWe provide a general framework for studying the expansion of strongly minimal sets by adding additional relations in the style of Hrushovski. We introduce a notion of separation of quantifiers which is a condition on the class of expansions of finitely generated models for the expanded theory to have a countable ω-saturated model. We apply these results to construct for each sufficiently fast growing finite-to-one function μ from ‘primitive extensions’ to the natural numbers a theory Tμ of an expansion of an algebraically closed field which has Morley rank 2. Finally, we show that if μ is not finite-to-one the theory may not be ω-stable.

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Nesin

Cherlin introduced the concept of bad groups (of finite Morley rank) in [Ch1]. The existence of such groups is an open question. If they exist, they will contradict the Cherlin-Zil'ber conjecture that states that an infinite simple group of finite Morley rank is a Chevalley group over an algebraically closed field. In this paper, we prove that bad groups of finite Morley rank 3 act on a natural geometry Γ (namely on a special pseudoplane; see Corollary 20) sharply flag-transitively.We show that Γ is not very far from being a projective plane and when it is so rk(Γ) = 2 and Γ is not Desarguesian (Theorem 2). Baldwin [Ba] recently discovered non-Desarguesian projective planes of Morley rank 2. This discovery, together with this paper, makes the existence of bad groups (also of bad fields) more plausible. A bad field is a pair (K, A) of finite Morley rank, where K is an algebraically closed field, A <≠K* and A is infinite. There existence is also unknown.In this paper, we define the concept of a sharp-field as a pair (K, A), where K is a field, A < K*and1. K = A − A,2. If a + b − 1 ∈ A, a ∈ A, b ∈ A, then either a = 1 or b = 1.If K is finite this is equivalent to 1 and2.′ ∣K∣ = ∣A∣2 ∣A∣ + 1.Finite sharp-fields are special cases of difference sets [De]


1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Geramita ◽  
C. A. Weibel

Throughout this paper all rings considered will be commutative, noetherian with identity. If R is such a ring and M is a finitely generated R-module, we shall use v(M) to denote that non-negative integer with the property that M can be generated by v(M) elements but not by fewer.Since every ideal in a noetherian ring is finitely generated, it is a natural question to ask what v(I) is for a given ideal I. Hilbert's Nullstellensatz may be viewed as the first general theorem dealing with this question, answering it when I is a maximal ideal in a polynomial ring over an algebraically closed field.More recently, it has been noticed that the properties of an R-ideal I are intertwined with those of the R-module I/I2.


1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1171-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Loveys

The Classification Theorem for ℵ0-categorical strictly minimal sets says that if H is strictly minimal and ℵ0-categorical, either H has in effect no structure at all or is essentially an affine or projective space over a finite field. Zil′ber, in [Z2], showed that if H were a counterexample to this Classification Theorem it would interpret a rank 2, degree 1 pseudoplane. Cherlin later noticed (see [CHL, Appendices 2 and 3], for the proof) that the Classification Theorem is a consequence of the Classification Theorem for finite simple groups. In [Z4] and [Z5], Zil′ber found a quite different proof of the Classification Theorem using no deep group theory.Meanwhile in [Z3], Zil′ber introduced the notion of envelope in an attempt to prove that no complete totally categorical theory T can be finitely axiomatizable. The idea of the proof was to show that if M is a model of such a T and H ⊆ M is strongly minimal, then an envelope of any sufficiently large finite subset of H is a finite model of any fixed finite subset of T. [Z3] contains an error, which Zil′ber has since corrected (in a nontrivial way).In [CHL], Cherlin, Harrington and Lachlan used the Classification Theorem to expand and reorganize Zil′ber's work. In particular, they generalized most of his work to ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures, proved the Morley rank is finite in these structures, and introduced the powerful Coordinatization Theorem (Theorem 3.1 of [CHL]; Proposition 1.14 of the present paper). They also showed that ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures are not finitely axiomatizable using a notion of envelope that is the same as Zil′ber's except in one particularly perverse case; [CHL]'s notion of envelope is used throughout the current paper. Peretyat'kin [P] has found an example of an ℵ1-categorical finitely axiomatizable structure.


1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Debonis ◽  
Ali Nesin

Generalized n-gons are certain geometric structures (incidence geometries) that generalize the concept of projective planes (the nontrivial generalized 3-gons are exactly the projective planes).In a simplified world, every generalized n-gon of finite Morley rank would be an algebraic one, i.e., one of the three families described in [9] for example. To our horror, John Baldwin [2], using methods discovered by Hrushovski [7], constructed ℵ1-categorical projective planes which are not algebraic. The projective planes that Baldwin constructed fail to be algebraic in a dramatic way.Indeed, every algebraic projective plane over an algebraically closed field is Desarguesian [12]. In particular, an algebraically closed field (isomorphic to the base field) can be interpreted in every one of them. However, in the projective planes that Baldwin constructed, one cannot even interpret an infinite group.In this article we show that the same phenomenon occurs for the generalized n-gons if n ≥ 3 is an odd integer. For each such n we construct many nonisomorphic generalized n-gons of finite Morley rank that do not interpret an infinite group. As one may expect, our method is inspired by Hrushovski and Baldwin, and we follow Baldwin's line of approach. Quite often our proofs are a verification of the fact that the proofs of Baldwin [2] for n = 3 carry over to an arbitrary positive odd integer n (which is sometimes far from being obvious). As in [2], we begin by defining a certain collection of finite graphs K* and a binary relation ≤ on these graphs. We show that (K*, ≤) satisfies the amalgamation property.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750012
Author(s):  
Xin Wen

Let [Formula: see text] be the special linear Lie algebra [Formula: see text] of rank 2 over an algebraically closed field [Formula: see text] of characteristic 3. In this paper, we classify all irreducible representations of [Formula: see text], which completes the classification of the irreducible representations of [Formula: see text] over an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic. Moreover, the multiplicities of baby Verma modules in projective modules and simple modules in baby Verma modules are given. Thus we get the character formulae for simple modules and the Cartan invariants of [Formula: see text].


1996 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Russo

Let X be an algebraic (complete) variety over a fixed algebraically closed field k. To every Cartier divisor D on X, we can associate the graded k-algebra . As is known, for a semi-ample divisor D, R(X, D) is a finitely generated k-algebra (see [21] or [9]), while this property is no longer true for arbitrary nef and big divisors (see [21]).


2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1570-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Burdges ◽  
Gregory Cherlin

Borovik proposed an axiomatic treatment of Morley rank in groups, later modified by Poizat, who showed that in the context of groups the resulting notion of rank provides a characterization of groups of finite Morley rank [2]. (This result makes use of ideas of Lascar, which it encapsulates in a neat way.) These axioms form the basis of the algebraic treatment of groups of finite Morley rank undertaken in [1].There are, however, ranked structures, i.e., structures on which a Borovik-Poizat rank function is defined, which are not ℵ0-stable [1, p. 376]. In [2, p. 9] Poizat raised the issue of the relationship between this notion of rank and stability theory in the following terms: “… un groupe de Borovik est une structure stable, alors qu'un univers rangé n'a aucune raison de l'être …” (emphasis added). Nonetheless, we will prove the following:Theorem 1.1. A ranked structure is superstable.An example of a non-ℵ0-stable structure with Borovik-Poizat rank 2 is given in [1, p. 376]. Furthermore, it appears that this example can be modified in a straightforward way to give ℵ0-stable structures of Borovik-Poizat rank 2 in which the Morley rank is any countable ordinal (which would refute a claim of [1, p. 373, proof of C.4]). We have not checked the details. This does not leave much room for strenghthenings of our theorem. On the other hand, the proof of Theorem 1.1 does give a finite bound for the heights of certain trees of definable sets related to unsuperstability, as we will see in Section 5.


2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 555-567
Author(s):  
JEFFREY BERGEN ◽  
PIOTR GRZESZCZUK

AbstractLet A be a domain over an algebraically closed field with Gelfand–Kirillov dimension in the interval [2,3). We prove that if A has two locally nilpotent skew derivations satisfying some natural conditions, then A must be one of five algebras. All five algebras are Noetherian, finitely generated, and have Gelfand–Kirillov dimension equal to 2. We also obtain some results comparing the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of an algebra to its subring of invariants under a locally nilpotent skew derivation.


1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1198-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Gropp

In this paper we study transitive group actions.:G × X → X, definable in an ω-stable theory, where G is a connected group and X a set of Morley rank 2, with respect to sharp transitivity on qα. Here q is the generic type of X (X is of degree 1 by Proposition (1)), for ordinals α > 0, qα is the αth power of q, i.e. (aβ)β < α, ⊨ qα iff (aβ)β < α is an independent sequence (in the sense of forking) of realizations of q, and G is defined to be sharply transitive on qα iff for all (aβ)β < α, (bβ)β < α ⊨ qα there is one and only one g ∈ G with g.aβ = bβ for all β < α. The question studied here is: For which powers α of q are there group actions subject to the above conditions with G sharply transitive on qα?In §1 we will see that for group actions satisfying the above conditions, G can be sharply transitive only on finite powers of q. Moreover, if G is sharply transitive on qn for some n ≥ 2, then the action of the stabilizer Ga on a certain subset Y of X satisfies the conditions above with Ga being sharply transitive on qm−1, where q′ is the generic type of Y (Proposition (8)). Thus, there would be a complete answer to the question if one could find some n < ω such that there is no group action as above with G sharply transitive on qn, but for n – 1 there is. In this paper we prove that such n exists and that it is either 5 or 6. More precisely, in §2 we prove that there is no group action satisfying the above conditions with G sharply transitive on q6. This is the main result of this paper. It is not known to the author whether the same also holds for q5 instead of q6. However, it does not hold for q4, as is seen in §3. There we give an example provided from projective geometry, for a group action satisfying the above conditions with G sharply transitive on q4; for G we choose PGL(3, K) and for X the projective plane over K, where K is some algebraically closed field.


1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Jones

Let be a finite dimensional toric variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, k. Let be the sheaf of differential operators on . We show that the ring of global sections, is a finitely generated Noetherian k-algebra and that its generators can be explicitly found. We prove a similar result for the sheaf of differential operators with coefficients in a line bundle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document