scholarly journals The Cephalic Index.

1887 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
J. G. Garson
Keyword(s):  
Cephalic Index

scholarly journals Quantitative Assessment of Shape Deformation of Regional Cranial Bone for Evaluation of Surgical Effect in Patients with Craniosynostosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 990
Author(s):  
Min Jin Lee ◽  
Helen Hong ◽  
Kyu Won Shim
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Assessment ◽  
Deformable Registration ◽  
Occipital Bone ◽  
Cranial Bone ◽  
Shape Deformation ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Skull Shape ◽  
Quantification Method ◽  
Parietal Bones

Surgery in patients with craniosynostosis is a common treatment to correct the deformed skull shape, and it is necessary to verify the surgical effect of correction on the regional cranial bone. We propose a quantification method for evaluating surgical effects on regional cranial bones by comparing preoperative and postoperative skull shapes. To divide preoperative and postoperative skulls into two frontal bones, two parietal bones, and the occipital bone, and to estimate the shape deformation of regional cranial bones between the preoperative and postoperative skulls, an age-matched mean-normal skull surface model already divided into five bones is deformed into a preoperative skull, and a deformed mean-normal skull surface model is redeformed into a postoperative skull. To quantify the degree of the expansion and reduction of regional cranial bones after surgery, expansion and reduction indices of the five cranial bones are calculated using the deformable registration as deformation information. The proposed quantification method overcomes the quantification difficulty when using the traditional cephalic index(CI) by analyzing regional cranial bones and provides useful information for quantifying the surgical effects of craniosynostosis patients with symmetric and asymmetric deformities.

scholarly journals Regression of cephalic index following endoscopic repair of sagittal synostosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Pickersgill ◽  
Gary B. Skolnick ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
Matthew D. Smyth ◽  
Kamlesh B. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Endoscopic Repair ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
Significant Regression ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

OBJECTIVEMetrics used to quantify preoperative severity and postoperative outcomes for patients with sagittal synostosis include cephalic index (CI), the well-known standard, and the recently described adjusted cephalic index (aCI), which accounts for altered euryon location. This study tracks the time course of these measures following endoscopic repair with orthotic helmet therapy. The authors hypothesize that CI and aCI show significant regression following endoscope-assisted repair.METHODSCT scans or 3D photographs of patients with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated before 6 months of age by endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy (n = 41) were reviewed retrospectively at three time points (preoperatively, 0–2 months after helmeting, and > 24 months postoperatively). The CI and aCI were measured at each time point.RESULTSMean CI and aCI increased from 71.8 to 78.2 and 62.7 to 72.4, respectively, during helmet treatment (p < 0.001). At final follow-up, mean CI and aCI had regressed significantly from 78.2 to 76.5 and 72.4 to 69.7, respectively (p < 0.001). The CI regressed in 33 of 41 cases (80%) and aCI in 39 of 41 cases (95%). The authors observed a mean loss of 31% of improvement in aCI achieved through treatment. A strong, positive correlation existed between CI and aCI (R = 0.88).CONCLUSIONSRegression following endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy commonly occurs in patients with sagittal synostosis. Future studies are required to determine whether duration of helmet therapy or modifications in helmet design affect regression.

An anthropometric study of Cephalic Index in south Indian students

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S23
Author(s):  
D. Apoorva ◽  
Girish V. Patil ◽  
Shishirkumar Thejeswari ◽  
Javed Sharif ◽  
C. Sheshgiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cephalic Index ◽  
South Indian ◽  
Indian Students ◽  
Anthropometric Study

scholarly journals Effect of craniofacial measures on the cephalic index of Japanese adult female students

2010 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
MD. GOLAM HOSSAIN ◽  
MD. SABIRUZZAMAN ◽  
SAIMA ISLAM ◽  
FUMIO OHTSUKI ◽  
PETE E. LESTREL
Keyword(s):  
Adult Female ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Japanese Adult

Cephalic index correlates poorly with intracranial volume in non-syndromic scaphocephalic patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 2097-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junnu Leikola ◽  
Virve Koljonen ◽  
Arja Heliövaara ◽  
Jyri Hukki ◽  
Mika Koivikko
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Volume ◽  
Cephalic Index

Comparison of aesthetic outcomes between open and endoscopically treated sagittal craniosynostosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jacob Lepard ◽  
S. Hassan A. Akbari ◽  
James Mooney ◽  
Anastasia Arynchyna ◽  
Samuel G. McClugage III ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head Circumference ◽  
Endoscopic Treatment ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Subjective Rating ◽  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Subjective Assessments ◽  
Z Scores

OBJECTIVE In the last several decades, there has been much debate regarding the ideal treatment for sagittal synostosis. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative, anthropometric, and subjective assessments of cosmetic outcomes between open and endoscopic management of isolated sagittal synostosis. METHODS At their routine postoperative follow-up, pediatric patients with sagittal craniosynostosis were recruited to undergo digital cranial measurement and standardized photography for objective and subjective assessments of perioperative outcomes. Age-normalized z-scores for cephalic index, head circumference, euryon-euryon diameter (Eu-Eu), and glabella-opisthocranion diameter (G-Op) were calculated for each patient. Faculty surgeons, surgical trainees, nurses, and laypersons were asked to rate the normalcy of craniofacial appearances using a 5-point Likert scale. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with endoscopic correction and those treated with open repair. RESULTS A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Thirty-one had undergone open surgical correction, and 19 had undergone endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic repair involved significantly lower operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and hospital length of stay than those with open repair (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of z-scores for head circumference (p = 0.22), cephalic index (p = 0.25), or Eu-Eu (p = 0.38). Endoscopic treatment was associated with a significantly lower G-Op (p = 0.009). Additionally, the average subjective rating of head shape was higher for endoscopic treatment when corrected for age, gender, and ethnicity (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The study findings suggest that patients who are treated endoscopically may have an overall more normal appearance in skull morphology and cosmesis, although these results are limited by poor reliability.

scholarly journals Study of Cephalic Index in Indian Students

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Kiran Yagain ◽  
Shakunthala R Pai ◽  
Sneha G Kalthur ◽  
P Chethan ◽  
I Hemalatha
Keyword(s):  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Indian Students

Comparing Cephalic Index and Midsagittal Vector Analysis in Assessing Morphology in Sagittal Synostosis: A CT-Based Morphometric Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 944-952
Author(s):  
Brian Y. Hong ◽  
Emily S. Ho ◽  
Elizabeth Zellner ◽  
John H. Phillips ◽  
Christopher R. Forrest
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Vector Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Ct Evaluation ◽  
The Difference

Introduction: Assessment of cranial dysmorphism in sagittal synostosis is often subjective but objective measures can be applied. These include cephalic index (CI) and midsagittal vector analysis (MSVA). Objective: To assess discriminant validity, construct validity, and responsiveness of CI and MSVA measured from computed tomography (CT) in patients with sagittal synostosis. Methods: Patients with nonsyndromic isolated sagittal synostosis with complete preoperative (n = 30) and postoperative (n = 13) CT data were included. Age-matched control group (n = 24) comprised of normocephalic patients who underwent CT for reasons related to trauma. Outcome Measures: Retrospective CT evaluation of CI and MSVA was conducted and correlated with a dysmorphism numeric rating scale (D-NRS) that measured surgeon-rated severity of sagittal synostosis. Responsiveness of CI and MSVA was evaluated using dysmorphism global rating of change (D-GRC). Results: Thirty patients with sagittal synostosis were demographically similar to 24 normocephalic patients. The difference in CI and MSVA was statistically significant between normocephalic and scaphocephalic patients. Cephalic index had a good correlation with D-NRS ( r = −0.665, ρ = −0.667), but not with MSVA ( r = 0.250, ρ = 0.203). Change in CI ( r = 0.738, ρ = 0.657) was well correlated with D-GRC, but not with MSVA ( r = −0.409, ρ = −0.301). Conclusion: Cephalic index appears to quantify the severity of sagittal synostosis better than MSVA. Cephalic index also has better responsiveness than MSVA to measure a reduction in severity of disease; however, MSVA is a better descriptive craniometric measurement. Midsagittal vector analysis was able to quantify the shift in morphology in sagittal synostosis following surgical treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document