Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Parental Satisfaction Outcomes of Strip Craniectomy with Postoperative Helmet versus Spring-Mediated Remodeling in Sagittal Craniosynostosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We sought to compare outcomes and parental satisfaction between 2 approaches for sagittal craniosynostosis: strip craniectomy with spring-mediated skull remodeling (SMSR) and strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet (SCH). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Perioperative and outcome data for SMSR or SCH patients between September 2010 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A telephone survey was administered to parents of children who underwent both procedures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 62 children were treated for sagittal craniosynostosis by either SMSR (<i>n</i> = 45) or SCH (<i>n</i> = 17). The SCH group had a lower estimated blood loss (27 vs. 47.06 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.021) and age at surgery (13.0 vs. 19.8 weeks) than the SMSR group. Three patients underwent early springs removal due to trauma or dislodgement, all of whom converted to helmeting. Of the 62 children initially identified, 59 were determined to have an adequate follow-up time to assess long-term outcomes. The mean follow-up time was 30.1 months (<i>n</i> = 16) in the SCH group and 32.0 months in the SMSR group (<i>n</i> = 43, <i>p</i> = 0.39). Two patients in the SCH group and one in the SMSR group converted to open cranial vault reconstruction. Thirty parents agreed to respond to the satisfaction survey (8 SCH, 22 SMSR) based on a Likert scale of responses (0 being most dissatisfied possible, 4 most satisfied possible). Average satisfaction was 3.86/4.0 in the SCH group and 3.45/4.0 in the SMSR group. No parents in the SCH group would change to SMSR, while 3 of the 22 SMSR survey responders would have changed to SCH. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Perioperative outcomes and average parental satisfaction were similar in both groups. Importance of helmet wear compliance and risk of spring dislodgement should be discussed with parents.

Spring-mediated cranioplasty versus endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) and spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) are two minimally invasive techniques for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in early infancy. Data comparing the perioperative outcomes of these two techniques are sparse. Here, the authors hypothesized that outcomes would be similar between patients undergoing SMC and those undergoing ESC and conducted a study using the multicenter Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry (PCSPR). METHODS The PCSPR was queried for infants under the age of 6 months who had undergone SMC or ESC for sagittal synostosis. SMC patients were propensity score matched 1:2 with ESC patients on age and weight. Primary outcomes were transfusion-free hospital course, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital length of stay (HLOS). The authors also obtained data points regarding spring removal. Comparisons of outcomes between matched groups were performed with multivariable regression models. RESULTS The query returned data from 676 infants who had undergone procedures from June 2012 through September 2019, comprising 580 ESC infants from 32 centers and 96 SMC infants from 5 centers. Ninety-six SMC patients were matched to 192 ESC patients. There was no difference in transfusion-free hospital course between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.45–1.35). SMC patients were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (aOR 7.50, 95% CI 3.75–14.99) and had longer ICU LOSs (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.37–1.48) and HLOSs (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17–1.39). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study of ESC and SMC, the authors found similar transfusion-free hospital courses; however, SMC infants had longer ICU LOSs and HLOSs. A trial comparing longer-term outcomes in SMC versus ESC would further define the roles of these two approaches in the management of sagittal craniosynostosis.

Single incision endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis

The authors describe an endoscopic strip craniectomy through a single incision for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis in a young infant. The endoscopic strip craniectomy was first introduced with the use of two incisions on either end of the fused suture. This single-incision technique offers several advantages. There is a cosmetic advantage and a reduced risk of wound complications. This technique also allows for early control of emissary veins and an inside-out identification of the lambdoid sutures. Endoscopic visualization is optimized to reduce the risk of blood loss, especially because circulating blood volume is very limited in these young infants. The video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/514366415

Management of sagittal synostosis in the Synostosis Research Group: baseline data and early outcomes

OBJECTIVE Sagittal synostosis is the most common form of isolated craniosynostosis. Although some centers have reported extensive experience with this condition, most reports have focused on a single center. In 2017, the Synostosis Research Group (SynRG), a multicenter collaborative network, was formed to study craniosynostosis. Here, the authors report their early experience with treating sagittal synostosis in the network. The goals were to describe practice patterns, identify variations, and generate hypotheses for future research. METHODS All patients with a clinical diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis who presented to a SynRG center between March 1, 2017, and October 31, 2019, were included. Follow-up information through October 31, 2020, was included. Data extracted from the prospectively maintained SynRG registry included baseline parameters, surgical adjuncts and techniques, complications prior to discharge, and indications for reoperation. Data analysis was descriptive, using frequencies for categorical variables and means and medians for continuous variables. RESULTS Two hundred five patients had treatment for sagittal synostosis at 5 different sites. One hundred twenty-six patients were treated with strip craniectomy and 79 patients with total cranial vault remodeling. The most common strip craniectomy was wide craniectomy with parietal wedge osteotomies (44%), and the most common cranial vault remodeling procedure was total vault remodeling without forehead remodeling (63%). Preoperative mean cephalic indices (CIs) were similar between treatment groups: 0.69 for strip craniectomy and 0.68 for cranial vault remodeling. Thirteen percent of patients had other health problems. In the cranial vault cohort, 81% of patients who received tranexamic acid required a transfusion compared with 94% of patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. The rates of complication were low in all treatment groups. Five patients (2%) had an unintended reoperation. The mean change in CI was 0.09 for strip craniectomy and 0.06 for cranial vault remodeling; wide craniectomy resulted in a greater change in CI in the strip craniectomy group. CONCLUSIONS The baseline severity of scaphocephaly was similar across procedures and sites. Treatment methods varied, but cranial vault remodeling and strip craniectomy both resulted in satisfactory postoperative CIs. Use of tranexamic acid may reduce the need for transfusion in cranial vault cases. The wide craniectomy technique for strip craniectomy seemed to be associated with change in CI. Both findings seem amenable to testing in a randomized controlled trial.

Minimally invasive strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis using a lighted retractor

Surgical options for metopic craniosynostosis include the traditional open approach or a minimally invasive approach that typically involves an endoscopy-assisted strip craniectomy. The minimally invasive approach has been associated with less blood loss and operative time, a lower transfusion rate, and a shorter length of stay. Additionally, it is more cost-effective than open reconstruction, despite the need for a postoperative cranial orthosis and multiple follow-up visits. The authors describe a variation of the minimally invasive approach using a lighted retractor to perform a strip craniectomy of the metopic suture in a 2-month-old patient with metopic craniosynostosis. The video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/511237503.

Pediatric Neurosurgery

This chapter focuses on pediatric neurosurgery. The first study compares the results of extended strip craniectomy versus subtotal calvarectomy with cranial vault remodeling for patients with sagittal craniosynostosis, while the second study tests the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy followed by helmet molding therapy in the treatment of infantile craniosynostosis. The next three studies determine the success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus, evaluate the risk factors for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt infection following initial shunt replacement, and assess the efficacy of drainage, irrigation, and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) for premature infants with posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Meanwhile, the following set of studies identifies the genetic alterations related to the pathogenesis of pediatric medulloblastoma and discusses the effect of prolonged postoperative chemotherapy on the ability to delay the delivery of radiation in children younger than 3 years of age with malignant brain tumors. The following two studies investigate whether prenatal repair of myelomeningocele could result in better neurologic function compared with the standard postnatal repair and explore functional outcomes following selective posterior rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy. The last study is of historical value and explore Cushing’s critical review of cerebellar medulloblastomas.