Victor Hugo and the Doctrine of the Right to Work

1935 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott M. Grant
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Martinelli Sabongi ◽  
Victor Hugo De Almeida ◽  
Igor Assagra Rodrigues Barbosa

O direito social ao trabalho como condição à busca pela felicidade  The social right to work as a condition to persuade happiness  Victor Hugo de Almeida* Camila Martinelli Sabongi** Igor Assagra Rodrigues Barbosa***  REFERÊNCIA ALMEIDA, Victor Hugo de; SABONGI, Camila Martinelli; BARBOSA, Igor Assagra Rodrigues. O direito social ao trabalho como condição à busca pela felicidade. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS, Porto Alegre, n. 38, p. 220-233, ago. 2018. RESUMOABSTRACTConquanto não haja previsão explícita no ordenamento pátrio, o direito à felicidade tem sido estampado em diversas decisões judiciais como desdobramento do princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana, relacionando-se, ainda, com a concretização dos direitos sociais e dos valores sociais do trabalho, fundamentos previstos constitucionalmente. Elencado como direito mínimo e indispensável à garantia de uma existência digna, tendo como escopo a preservação, o direito ao trabalho livre e emancipador é constitucionalmente previsto, de importância reconhecida para o pleno desenvolvimento do indivíduo, tanto para suprir suas necessidades essenciais, possibilitando sua existência digna, mas também como forma de se realizar pessoal e socialmente. Este artigo visa analisar os contornos do direito ao trabalho, sua relação com o direito à busca pela felicidade e a concretude desses na realidade do indivíduo no mundo contemporâneo do trabalho. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de natureza teórico-exploratória, pautada no método de levantamento de dados por meio da técnica de pesquisa bibliográfica, e, como método de abordagem, o indutivo. A análise proposta evidencia a necessidade de se implementar políticas públicas de conscientização que prezem pela efetivação dos direitos humanos, sociais e trabalhistas, de forma a promover o direito ao trabalho digno, realizador e emancipador, que corrobore com o bem-estar do trabalhador, possibilitando, assim, a felicidade em sua plenitude, tanto coletiva como subjetiva.  Although there is no explicit provision in the country's legal system, the right to happiness has been printed in several judicial decisions as a result of the principle of the dignity of the human person, and is related to the realization of social rights and social values of work, fundamentals provided for in the Constitution. Classified as a minimum and indispensable right to guarantee a dignified existence, having as its objective the preservation, the right to free and emancipatory work is constitutionally foreseen, of recognized importance for the full development of the individual, both to meet their essential needs, enabling their existence dignified, but also as a way of achieving oneself personally and socially. This work aims to analyze the right to work contours, its relation to the right to pursuit happiness and the concreteness of both rights in person’s reality in the contemporary world of work. This is a theoretical and exploratory research guided by a data collection method through literature research technique, and as an approach method, it will be used the inductive method. The proposed analysis evidences the need to implement public awareness-raising policies that promote the realization of human, social and labor rights, in order to promote the right to decent, fulfilling and emancipatory work that corroborates the worker's well-being, thus making happiness possible in its fullness, both collective and subjective.PALAVRAS-CHAVEKEYWORDSDireito Social ao Trabalho. Felicidade. Direitos Humanos.Social Right to Work. Happiness. Human Right.* Professor de Direito do Trabalho da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), São Paulo. Doutor em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (USP).  ** Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), São Paulo. Bolsista Fapesp 2016-2018.*** Mestrando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (USP).


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 180-188
Author(s):  
Bianca Nicla Romano

Art. 24 of the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights recognises and protects the right of the individual to rest and leisure. This right has to be fully exercised without negative consequences on the right to work and the remuneration. Tourism can be considered one of the best ways of rest and leisure because it allows to enrich the personality of the individual. Even after the reform of the Title V this area is no longer covered by the Italian Constitution, the Italian legal system protects and guarantees it as a real right, so as to get to recognize its existence and the consequent compensation of the so-called “ruined holiday damage”. This kind of damage has not a patrimonial nature, but a moral one, and the Tourist-Traveler can claim for it when he has not been able to fully enjoy his holiday - the essential fulcrum of tourism - intended as an opportunity for leisure and/or rest, essential rights of the individual.


1969 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Craig Roberts ◽  
Norman L. Brown
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (14) ◽  
pp. 67-81
Author(s):  
Altuğ YENGİNAR

The right to work has been recognized as a fundamental human right in almost all international human rights documents and in the constitutions of many countries. This right has been recognized and guaranteed as a fundamental human right also in the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey. However, not only recognizing and guaranteeing "work" as a fundamental human right but also regulating its implementation and functioning within the framework of laws is of great importance. The concept of overwork is a concept that has been mentioned in the Labor Law regarding the implementation and functioning of the concept of work and it is regulated in our Labor Law No. 4857. In order to talk about overwork, a limited working time is required. In this context, upon determining the maximum number of hours a worker can work per week by drawing a limit on working hours in Labor Law No. 4857, overwork, which is the subject of work exceeding this period, is defined. Furthermore, the types of overwork that arise depending on the reasons for overworking, as well as the jobs that cannot be overworked, are regulated in the same Law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-115
Author(s):  
Soo Jung Jang ◽  
Kyungheun Baek ◽  
Byoung-Inn Kim ◽  
Hyejung Lee ◽  
Jin Bhang Oh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document