Clinical Savvy: How Do You Use the Continuous Passive Motion Device?

1986 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 657
Author(s):  
Carole Birdsall
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 815
Author(s):  
Husam Almusawi ◽  
Géza Husi

Impairments of fingers, wrist, and hand forearm result in significant hand movement deficiencies and daily task performance. Most of the existing rehabilitation assistive robots mainly focus on either the wrist training or fingers, and they are limiting the natural motion; many mechanical parts associated with the patient’s arms, heavy and expensive. This paper presented the design and development of a new, cost-efficient Finger and wrist rehabilitation mechatronics system (FWRMS) suitable for either hand right or left. The proposed machine aimed to present a solution to guide individuals with severe difficulties in their everyday routines for people suffering from a stroke or other motor diseases by actuating seven joints motions and providing them repeatable Continuous Passive Motion (CPM). FWRMS approach uses a combination of; grounded-exoskeleton structure to provide the desired displacement to the hand’s four fingers flexion/extension (F/E) driven by an indirect feed drive mechanism by adopting a leading screw and nut transmission; and an end-effector structure to provide angular velocity to the wrist flexion/ extension (F/E), wrist radial/ulnar deviation (R/U), and forearm supination/pronation (S/P) driven by a rotational motion mechanism. We employed a single dual-sided actuator to power both mechanisms. Additionally, this article presents the implementation of a portable embedded controller. Moreover, this paper addressed preliminary experimental testing and evaluation process. The conducted test results of the FWRMS robot achieved the required design characteristics and executed the motion needed for the continuous passive motion rehabilitation and provide stable trajectories guidance by following the natural range of motion (ROM) and a functional workspace of the targeted joints comfortably for all trainable movements by FWRMS.


1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Steve Morris ◽  
Amis Freiberg ◽  
Leonard Harris

S Morris, a Freiberg, L Harris. Early experience with hand continuous passive motion. Can J Plast Surg 1993; 1 (1): 19-23. Clinical experience with continuous passive motion (CPM) has increased in recent years. However, little information is available in the literature of objective evaluation of the results obtained using this treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to review both the indications for hand CPM at the Toronto Western Hospital. Toronto. Ontario, and the course and the outcome of the patients treated. Between 1984 and 1989 the Mobilimb H1 CPM was used on 43 patients for a mean period of 39±6 days (mean total hours of CPM 741+84 h). Indications for hand CPM included hand trauma, capsulectomy and tenolysis and other hand conditions. Mean follow-up was 32+3 months. Overall, hand CPM was well tolerated and highly effective in relieving hand pain and increasing active and passive range of motion. Compliance was excellent.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 837-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Ling Hu ◽  
Kai-yu Tong ◽  
Rong Song ◽  
Xiu Juan Zheng ◽  
Wallace W. F. Leung

Background. The effect of using robots to improve motor recovery has received increased attention, even though the most effective protocol remains a topic of study. Objective . The objective was to compare the training effects of treatments on the wrist joint of subjects with chronic stroke with an interactive rehabilitation robot and a robot with continuous passive motion. Methods. This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up. Twenty-seven hemiplegic subjects with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to receive 20-session wrist training with a continuous electromyography (EMG)-driven robot (interactive group, n = 15) and a passive motion device (passive group, n = 12), completed within 7 consecutive weeks. Training effects were evaluated with clinical scores by pretraining and posttraining tests (Fugl-Meyer Assessment [FMA] and Modified Ashworth Score [MAS]) and with session-by-session EMG parameters (EMG activation level and co-contraction index). Results. Significant improvements in FMA scores (shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand) were found in the interactive group ( P < .05). Significant decreases in the MAS were observed in the wrist and elbow joints for the interactive group and in the wrist joint for the passive group ( P < .05). These MAS changes were associated with the decrease in EMG activation level of the flexor carpi radialis and the biceps brachii for the interactive group ( P < .05). The muscle coordination on wrist and elbow joints was improved in the interactive groups in the EMG co-contraction indexes across the training sessions ( P < .05). Conclusions. The interactive treatment improved muscle coordination and reduced spasticity after the training for both the wrist and elbow joints, which persisted for 3 months. The passive mode training mainly reduced the spasticity in the wrist flexor.


1991 ◽  
Vol &NA; (266) ◽  
pp. 218???225 ◽  
Author(s):  
HERBERT P. VON SCHROEDER ◽  
RICHARD D. COUTTS ◽  
EDMUND BILLINGS ◽  
MICHAEL T. MAI ◽  
MICHAEL ARATOW

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document