The Journal Review Process

2021 ◽  
pp. 169-196
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana R. Hermanson

ABSTRACT In this essay, I reflect on my roughly 25 years in accounting research by discussing 25 topics related to (1) the journal review process, (2) specific types of accounting research, and (3) the research process. I hope that these observations will prompt additional thought and discussion, help accounting doctoral students and faculty to publish their research, and potentially challenge some readers.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane S. Dikolli ◽  
John H. Evans ◽  
Jeffrey Hales ◽  
Michal Matejka ◽  
Donald V. Moser ◽  
...  

SYNOPSIS Analytical models can quite naturally complement empirical data, whether archival or experimental. This article begins by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of combining an analytical model with archival or experimental data in a single study. We next describe how models are typically used in empirical research and discuss when including an analytical model is more versus less useful. Finally, we offer examples of more and less successful combinations of analytical models and empirical data, along with a brief discussion of how such studies are likely to fare in the journal review process. JEL Classifications: C02; C51; C99.


1996 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Rabinovich

1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN W. GILLILAND ◽  
JOSÉ M. CORTINA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document