scholarly journals Effect of premolar extraction on mandibular third molar impaction in young adults

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Çağrı Türköz ◽  
Çağrı Ulusoy

ABSTRACT Objective: To test the null hypothesis that orthodontic therapy with or without premolar extraction does not result in any difference in third molar impaction. Materials and Methods: Two groups were formed: 22 patients in one group with first premolar extractions and 22 patients in the other group without extractions. All patients were nongrowing subjects who had normal gonial angles and were skeletal Class I at the beginning of treatment. The available space for third molars, inclination of second and third molars, and angle between the second and third molars were evaluated. Also, the correlation of measured parameters and type of orthodontic therapy with the eruption of third molars was evaluated. Results: Of the third molars, 81.8% were impacted in the nonextraction group and 63.6% were impacted in the extraction group. Impaction of mandibular third molars was significantly correlated to the pretreatment and posttreatment inclination of third molars and the angle between the second and third molars. In the extraction therapy group, the retromolar distance increased significantly with a mean of 1.30 ± 1.25 mm. Conclusions: When the inclination of the third molar is inconvenient, the tooth may remain impacted even if there is enough retromolar space.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Žigante ◽  
Andrej Pavlic ◽  
Luka Morelato ◽  
Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic ◽  
Stjepan Spalj

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the presence and dynamics of mandibular third molar development and the occurrence and amount of late mandibular incisor crowding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental plaster casts and panoramic radiographs of 72 orthodontically untreated subjects from the Nittedal growth study, Norway were analysed. The subjects were recalled for check-up at 12, 15, 18 and 21 years of age. Mandibular incisor crowding was assessed using the Little’s irregularity index and dental maturation of the third molars by the Cameriere’s index.RESULTS: The majority of the subjects (64%) had ≥1mm increase in irregularity; 22% experienced increase of 0.1-0.9mm and 14% had unchanged or decreased irregularity. Incisor irregularity increased with age, regardless of absence or presence of third molars. The amount of change in incisor irregularity from 12 to 21 years did not differ significantly between subjects with hypodontia of third molars, extraction and those with third molars present. No differences were observed between erupted, unerupted or impacted third molars. No correlation was found between the amount of change in irregularity and maturation of the third molars.CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence and amount of mandibular late incisor crowding is not significantly influenced by presence or development dynamics of mandibular third molars.


2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1143-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suruchi Jain ◽  
Ashima Valiathan

Abstract Objective: To compare the angular changes in the developing mandibular third molars in both first premolar extraction and nonextraction cases and to determine whether premolar extraction results in a more mesial movement of the mandibular buccal segment and causes favorable rotational changes in the mandibular third molar tilt, which can enhance later eruption of the third molars. Materials and Methods: Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) panoramic radiographs were taken of 25 subjects who had been treated by the extraction of all the first premolars and 25 subjects who had been treated with nonextraction. The horizontal reference plane was used to measure and compare the changes in the angles of the developing mandibular third molars. Results: The mean uprighting of the mandibular third molars seen in the extraction group was 8.2 ± 5.4 degrees on the left side and 6.3 ± 6.5 degrees on the right side following treatment (T2 − T1). For the nonextraction group the mean difference was 1.3 ± 4.3 degrees on the left side and 1.7 ± 5.4 degrees on the right side. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (P = .012 on the right side and P < .001 on the left side). Conclusions: Premolar extractions had a positive influence on the developing third molar angulations. Nonextraction therapy did not have any adverse effects.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjit Singh Munjit Singh ◽  
Suhardjo Sitam ◽  
Belly Sam

Introduction: The third molar is undoubtedly the most variable tooth in the human dentition, and also the most common tooth to become impacted due to it being the last tooth to erupt into the dental arch The aim of research is to obtain the prevalence of the mandibular third molar (M3) impaction among the patients attending the Radiology Clinic. Methods: The type of research conducted was a descriptive research. The sampling was purposive, drawn from a population of 1451 digital panoramic radiographs taken from January – December in the year 2010, of which 392 samples were included in the survey, with patient ages ranging between 18 – 59 years at time of exposure. The position of the M3’s was assessed using the Pell and Gregory and, Winter’s impaction classification. Results: The prevalence of impacted mandibular M3’s in this study is 76.8% overall. Of the impacted mandibular M3’s present, 76.1% were bilateral impactions and of these bilateral impactions 50.7% are similar in impaction classification. Of the mandibular M3’s examined, 40.1% are in a vertical angulation, 33.3% mesioangular, 23.5% horizontal and 3.1% distoangular. The three most common types of impaction according to the Pell and Gregory classification are IIB at 38.5%, IA at 36.8% and IIA at 18.8%. Conclusion: Prevalence of  mandibular third molar of the patients attending the Radiology Clinic is 76.8%.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Ajay Sudhakar Nitturkar ◽  
Sachin Doshi ◽  
Girish Karandikar ◽  
Samay Tahilramani ◽  
Bhavisha Gandhi

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the angular changes in the developing third molars in both first premolar extraction and nonextraction cases and to determine if premolar extraction results in greater mesial movement of mandibular buccal segment and also causes favorable rotational changes in the third molar tip, which can improve later eruption of the third molars. Materials and Methods Pretreatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) panoramic radiographs were obtained 31 subjects were taken who had been treated by extraction of all first premolars and for 21 subjects treated with nonextraction theray. Occlusal plane was used to measure and compare the changes in the angles of the developing maxillary and mandibular third molars. Results The mean uprighting of the third molars seen in the extraction group was 8.7° ± 10.29° and 2.97° ± 11.11° on the right side, and 5.14° ± 9.04° and 2.77° ± 12.10° on the left side following treatment (T2 – T1). For the nonextraction group, the mean difference was – 1.52 ± 6.43 and – 6.430 ± 12.21° on the right side, and – 3.90° ± 7.67° and – 5.7° ± 7.23° on the left side. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion Premolar extractions had a positive influence on the developing third molar angulations. Nonextraction therapy did not have any adverse effects. How to cite this article Nitturkar AS, Doshi S, Krishnan RV, Karandikar G, Tahilramani S, Gandhi B. Effects of Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment on Third Molar Angulation. J Contemp Dent 2015;5(1):17-21.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Mylena Ranieri Libdy ◽  
Nicole Melres Rabello ◽  
Leandro Silva Marques ◽  
David Normando

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the skill of orthodontists and oral/maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS) in providing a prognosis of mandibular third molars spontaneously erupted, through follow-up panoramic analysis. Methods: 22 orthodontic patients treated without extraction, presenting spontaneously erupted mandibular third molars (n = 44) were analyzed through panoramic serial radiographs. The first panoramic radiograph was obtained just after orthodontic treatment (PR1), in patients aging from 13 to 19 years. A second panoramic radiograph (PR2), was obtained in average two years later. The radiographs were randomly analyzed by 54 specialists, 27 orthodontists and 27 OMFS, to obtain the opinion about the approach to be adopted to these teeth in PR1. Then, another opinion was collected by adding a serial radiograph (PR1+2). Results: The concordance of the answers was moderate for OMFS (Kappa 0.44; p< 0.0001) and significant for orthodontists (Kappa 0.39; p< 0.0001). In the analysis of the first radiograph (PR1) of the spontaneously erupted molars, OMFS indicated extraction in 44.5% of cases, while orthodontists indicated in 42%, with no difference between groups (p= 0.22). In PR1+2 analysis, orthodontists maintained the same level of extraction indication (45.6%, p= 0.08), while surgeons indicated more extractions (63.2%, p< 0.0001). Conclusions: Orthodontists and OMFS were not able to predict the eruption of the third molars that have erupted spontaneously. Both indicated extractions around half of the third molars. A follow-up analysis, including one more radiograph, did not improve the accuracy of prognosis among orthodontists and worsened for OMFS.


Author(s):  
Martina Zigante ◽  
Andrej Pavlic ◽  
Luka Morelato ◽  
Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic ◽  
Stjepan Spalj

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the absence, presence and dynamics of mandibular third molar development and the occurrence and amount of late mandibular incisor crowding. Dental plaster casts and panoramic radiographs of 72 orthodontically untreated subjects from the Nittedal growth study, Norway were analyzed. The subjects were recalled for a checkup at 12, 15, 18 and 21 years of age. Mandibular incisor crowding was assessed using Little’s irregularity index and dental maturation of the third molars by the Cameriere’s index. The majority of the subjects (64%) had ≥1 mm increase in irregularity; 22% experienced an increase of 0.1–0.9 mm and 14% had unchanged or decreased irregularity. Incisor irregularity increased with age, regardless of absence or presence of third molars. The amount of change in incisor irregularity from 12 to 21 years did not differ significantly between subjects with hypodontia of third molars, extraction and those with third molars present. No differences were observed between erupted, unerupted or impacted third molars. No correlation was found between the amount of change in irregularity and maturation of the third molars. In conclusion, occurrence and amount of mandibular late incisor crowding is not significantly influenced by the presence of mandibular third molars or their development dynamics.


2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Altuğ Bıçakçı ◽  
Oral Sökücü ◽  
Hasan Babacan ◽  
H. Hüseyin Köşger

Abstract Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is a relationship between forward mandibular third molar migration and root curvature of the mandibular third molars. Materials and Methods: The study is comprised of 64 patients who had a history of unilateral mandibular first molar extraction before 16 years of age with no other missing teeth or prosthetic restorations in the mandible. The extraction space was fully or partly closed. The mean remaining space was 1.1 ± 0.41 mm. The root angles for the mesial and distal roots of the mandibular third molars were measured on the panoramic radiographs by calculating the differences between the angle formed by the long axis drawn perpendicular to the occlusal plane of the crown of mandibular third molar and the central line of the lower one ninth of the root through the root apex. The differences between the extracted and nonextracted sides for mesial and distal roots were analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Results: Both mesial and distal roots were approximately 8° more vertical on the extraction sides than on the nonextraction sides. The differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Mesial tooth migration of mandibular third molars reduces the amount of root curvature developing on this tooth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
Sana Viqar ◽  
◽  
Sadia Rizwan ◽  
Syed Shah Faisal ◽  
Syed Sheeraz Hussain

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of mandibular third molar impaction in different vertical skeletal facial types. METHODOLOGY: Data was collected using pre-treatment records including orthodontic files, pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and OPGs of 90 orthodontic patients. Patients from both genders were included. The age group of selected patients was 18-30 years. Vertical skeletal malocclusion was measured using facial angle and mandibular plane angle on cephalogram to group the subjects into Mesiofacial, Brachyfacial and Dolichofacial patients. Third molar eruption status was assessed using OPG. RESULTS: Results showed that erupted third molars were mostly found in brachyfacial patients. Among 32 erupted mandibular third molars, 16 belong to brachyfacial, 11 belonged to mesiofacial and 5 belonged to dolichofacial group. Complete impaction of mandibular third molar was most common among dolichofacial patients. Among 29 completely impacted mandibular third molars, 14 belong to dolichofacial, 9 belonged to mesiofacial and 6 belonged to brachyfacial group. No significant difference was found for partially impacted third molars among the three groups of facial types. There was higher prevalence of mandibular third molar impaction in females as compared to males. CONCLUSION: Frequency of third molar impaction was found to be highest in dolichofacial patients and lowest in brachyfacial patients due to forward direction of mandibular growth contributing to greater resorption of the anterior border of ramus and the additional space required for third molar eruption.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gargi S. Sarode ◽  
Sachin C. Sarode ◽  
Ghevaram Prajapati ◽  
Mahesh Maralingannavar ◽  
Shankargouda Patil

Two cases of calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT) of the dental follicle in an impacted third molar without clinical and radiological evidence are reported during routine histopathological examination. In both the cases left mandibular third molar was mesioangularly impacted with pericoronal radiolucency of less than 2.5 mm, which was not indicative of any pathology. As a routine protocol (which is not practiced widely) of our institution, dental follicles associated with extracted molars were sent for histopathological examination. Histopathological features were consistent with CCOT with pathognomonic ghost cell transformation of odontogenic epithelium. The patients were followed for one year with no recurrence. This paper emphasizes the importance of routine histopathological examination of dental follicles associated with asymptomatic impacted teeth without any clinical or radiographic evidence of follicular lesion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document