scholarly journals The effect of changes in primary attending doctor coverage frequency on orthodontic treatment time and results

2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Caskey Peppers ◽  
V. Leroy Leggitt ◽  
Joseph M. Caruso ◽  
Roland Neufeld ◽  
James Green
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Missed Appointments ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Quality Of Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

ABSTRACT Objective:  To determine whether changes in primary attending (PA) doctor coverage frequency caused an increase in orthodontic treatment time or a decrease in the quality of treatment results in a postgraduate orthodontic clinic. The effect of T1 Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scores on PA doctor coverage frequency, treatment times, and results was also evaluated. Materials and Methods:  A sample of 191 postorthodontic subjects was divided into three groups based on PA doctor coverage (high, medium, or low). Treatment times, treatment results, and other variables were compared between the three PA coverage groups. Additionally, the sample was divided into three groups based on T1 PAR scores. Attending coverage frequency, treatment times, and results were compared between the T1 PAR groups. Results:  No statistically significant differences were found in treatment time (P  =  .128) or results (P  =  .052). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean scores for T1 PAR (P  =  .056), T2 PAR (P  =  .602), patient age at T1 (P  =  .747), total appointments (P  =  .128), missed appointments (P  =  .177), or cancelled appointments (P  =  .183). Statistically significant differences were found between the low T1 PAR group and the medium and high T1 PAR groups (attending coverage, P  =  .008; results, P < .001; treatment time, P  =  .001). Conclusions:  Under the conditions of this study, variations in PA doctor coverage frequency did not lengthen orthodontic treatment or reduce the quality of treatment results. Low T1 PAR scores were associated with less PA coverage, less change in PAR, and shorter treatment times.

scholarly journals PAR Evaluation of Treated Class I Extraction Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas ◽  
Daniel Salvatore Freitas ◽  
Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli ◽  
Marcos Roberto Freitas ◽  
Guilherme Janson
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Class I ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Treatment Changes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dental Casts ◽  
Peer Assessment Rating

Abstract Objective: To evaluate treatment changes and quality of finishing occlusion in Class I patients treated with four premolar extractions. Material and Methods: Dental casts of 94 subjects (50 males and 44 females) were evaluated. Mean pretreatment age was 13.46 years, and mean treatment time was 2.09 years. The peer assessment rating (PAR) index was obtained from pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts. Results: The mean pretreatment PAR index of 29.46 was reduced to 6.32 at posttreatment stage, achieving a reduction of 78.54% with treatment. There was correlation between the initial PAR and correction during treatment, that is, the more severe the malocclusion the greater the treatment changes. Conclusion: The cases evaluated showed a high-standard orthodontic finishing.

scholarly journals Orthodontic Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes in an Educational Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
T. Al-Jewair ◽  
V. Ryan ◽  
S. Warunek
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Educational Setting ◽  
Dental Esthetics ◽  
Treatment Characteristics ◽  
The Mean

Background. To assess and correlate orthodontic treatment characteristics and outcomes in an educational setting. Methods. A total of 287 patients were included. Independent chart reviews were conducted to gather demographic and pretreatment diagnostic information. Posttreatment digital records were graded with the ABO C-R Eval and the CCA methods. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine associations between variables. Results. Of the 287 patients, 122 (42.5%) were male and 165 (57.5%) were female. The total average treatment time was 33.87 ± 10.28 months, with a range from 11 to 75 months. The mean ABO C-R Eval score was 29.10 ± 8.59 points. The parameters with the highest scores were buccolingual inclination and occlusal contacts. The mean CCA score was 3.36 ± 2.05 points. The highest scores were recorded for dental esthetics and management of the periodontium. Higher ABO DI scores were weakly correlated with longer treatment times (r = 0.258; p<0.001). ABO C-R Eval scores showed a weakly significant association with treatment duration (r = 0.162; p=0.006), while CCA scores were moderately associated with treatment duration (r = 0.451; p<0.001). Conclusions. As treatment duration increased, the total ABO C-R Eval and CCA scores tended to increase; thus, quality of treatment outcomes decreased. A significant positive correlation was also found with the ABO DI score and treatment duration.

scholarly journals Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to postretention stability

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas ◽  
Marcos Roberto de Freitas ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Arnaldo Pinzan ◽  
José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Par Index ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Times

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to retrospectively evaluate Class I malocclusion cases treated with extraction of the four first premolars, aiming to establish the relationship between the quality of orthodontic treatment outcomes and the long-term occlusal stability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample comprised 94 patients of both genders, presenting Class I malocclusion, treated with extractions of the four first premolars and Edgewise mechanics. All the patients selected were whites, being 50 males and 44 females. The mean pretreatment age was 13.46 years (s.d. 1.8). The mean treatment time was 2.09 years (s.d. 0.58), the mean retention time was 1.63 years (s.d. 0.73) and the mean time of postretention evaluation was 5.31 years (s.d. 1.61). The dental casts were measured at pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2) and postretention (T3), by the PAR index and by the Little irregularity index, and the correction due to treatment (T1-2) and the change at the postretention period (T3-2) were calculated. The descriptive statistics was performed and the Pearson correlation coefficient was applied for the PAR and the Little indices in the total sample, among the times evaluated. RESULTS: The mean PAR reduction due to treatment was 78.54%, and 66.6%, at the postretention stage related to pretreatment stage. Significant correlations were found for the PAR index at the times evaluated, except between T1 and T2 and between T1-2 and T3. In other words, the higher the treatment correction (T1-2), the lower the posttreatment PAR index (PAR T2) will be, and the higher will be the PAR change at the postretention period (PAR T3-2). Also, the higher the posttreatment PAR score (PAR T2), the higher will be the postretention PAR score (PAR T3). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the quality of orthodontic treatment outcomes is not related to the long-term occlusal stability.

scholarly journals Efficiency of compensatory orthodontic treatment of mild Class III malocclusion with two different bracket systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mônica L. C. Aragón ◽  
Lívia M. Bichara ◽  
Carlos Flores-Mir ◽  
Guilherme Almeida ◽  
David Normando
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Missed Appointments ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Efficiency Comparison

ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency of compensatory orthodontic treatment of patients with mild Class III malocclusion with two preadjusted bracket systems. Method: Fifty-six matched patients consecutively treated for mild Class III malocclusion through compensatory dentoalveolar movements were retrospectively evaluated after analysis of orthodontic records. The sample was divided into two groups according to the brackets used: Group 1 = non-Class III compensated preadjusted brackets, Roth prescription (n = 28); Group 2 = compensated Class III preadjusted brackets, Capelozza III prescription (n = 28). Cephalometric analysis, number of appointments and missed appointments, months using Class III elastics, and bond/band failures were considered. Treatment time, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index at the beginning (PAR T1) and end of treatment (PAR T2) were used to calculate treatment efficiency. Comparison was performed using a MANOVA at p< 0.05. Results: Missed appointments, bond or band failures, number of months using the Class III intermaxillary elastics, and cephalometric measurements showed no statistically significant difference (p> 0.05) between groups. Patients treated with Roth brackets had a treatment time 7 months longer (p= 0.01). Significant improvement in the patient’s occlusion (PAR T2-T1) was observed for both groups without difference (p= 0.22). Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets designed for compensation of mild Class III malocclusions appear to be more efficient than non-compensated straight-wire prescription brackets. Treatment time for Class III patients treated with brackets designed for compensation was shorter than with Roth prescription and no difference in the quality of the occlusal outcome was observed. A prospective randomized study is suggested to provide a deeper look into this subject.

The influence of overall treatment time to the efficiency of chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul ◽  
Panupat Rugpong ◽  
Nisa Chawapun ◽  
Razvan M. Galalae
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

AbstractPurposeThis study aims to clarify the influence of overall treatment time (OTT) on the efficiency of combined chemo-radiotherapy in cervical cancer.Material and methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 122 cervical cancer patients who had squamous cell carcinoma and had undergone definitive chemo-radiotherapy from 2009 to 2013. All patients received whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) with the dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (with central shielding after 44 Gy) plus intracavitary brachytherapy with the dose of 28 Gy in four fractions. During WPRT, all patients received concurrent chemotherapy with weekly platinum-based regimen. The data of patient characteristics, OTT, treatment results and toxicities were collected and evaluated.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 36 months. The mean age of patients was 52 years old; 68% of patients were stage IIB related to International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging. Pelvic control (PC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates did not differ significantly in the data-derived cut points of 55·8 and 53 days. No statistically significant difference in treatment results between the two groups of OTT<49 and OTT≥62 days was observed.ConclusionsIn our data-derived cut point, OTT did not influence to PC, DMFS, DFS and OS. The influence of OTT on treatment results may be found in longer periods.

scholarly journals Existence of Cervical Discopathy in Non-Cyclic Mastodynia

Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-181
Author(s):  
Mustafa Alimoğulları ◽  
Hakan Buluş
Keyword(s):  
Subjective Symptom ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Time Of Presentation

Background: Mastodynia is a subjective symptom that impairs the quality of life. It may be directly related with breast disorders. Moreover, a substantial rate is caused of reflective pain. Objectives: Non-cyclic mastodynia is multifactorial, and treatment should be planned according to the underlying cause. In this study, we aim to evaluate the existence of cervical discopathy via cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the etiology of non-cyclic mastodynia. Methods: The study included 60 patients with normal physical examination results and imaging findings. Management was determined individually in patients. Patients with pathological MRI findings were evaluated by physical therapy, rehabilitation, and neurosurgery specialists, and appropriate treatment was planned. Patients were evaluated with the visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring system at initial presentation and after 1 and 3 months of treatment. Results: The majority of patients had positive findings on MRI (53 [88.4%] vs. 7 [11.6%]). The mean VAS scores at the time of presentation, after 1, and after 3 months of treatment were 7.41, 6.39, and 3.35, respectively. The decrease in the scores was statistically significant (p ≤ 0,01). Conclusions: We suggest that cervical discopathy should be kept in mind in cases of idiopathic non-cyclic mastodynia. Furthermore, cervical discopathy-related mastodynia seems to have a good response to appropriate treatment.

Maurice Berman prize for clinical excellence 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-177
Author(s):  
Trevor M Hodge
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Clinical Excellence ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Case Mix ◽  
Case Complexity ◽  
Quality Of Treatment

This paper describes the orthodontic treatment of the three cases awarded the 2018 Maurice Berman Prize. The award is made on the basis of case complexity, case-mix variety, quality of treatment provided and results obtained, and the quality and format of the three case reports submitted through to post-treatment records.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document