111-LB: Preadmission Insulin Treatment Was Associated with Increased In-Hospital Mortality among Critically Ill Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 111-LB
Author(s):  
RONGPING FAN
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongping Fan ◽  
Xuemin Peng ◽  
Bo Yu ◽  
Jiaojiao Huang ◽  
Xuefeng Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims: Although insulin treatment is widely used in critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the intensive care unit (ICU), the clinical outcomes of insulin treatment remain unclear. This retrospective study aimed to explore the impact of insulin treatment on mortality and ICU stay among patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We consecutively recruited 578 ICU patients with type 2 diabetes, from 2011 to 2021. According to their medication history regarding insulin use before and after ICU admission, these patients were categorized into three groups: N-N (treated without insulin before and after ICU admission), N-I (treated without insulin before and with insulin after ICU admission) and I-I (treated with insulin before and after ICU admission). Clinical characteristics were analyzed, and clinical outcomes including mortality and the length of ICU stay were compared between the groups. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain comparable subpopulation and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves were graphed to describe the survival trend of different groups. Results: Compared with the N-N group, the N-I and I-I groups had significantly higher ICU mortality rates [20.0% (N-I) and 24.6% (I-I) vs. 0.0% (N-N); p < 0.001; respectively] and longer lengths of ICU stay [ 8.5 (N-I), 9 (I-I) vs. 6 (N-N), p < 0.05, respectively]. After propensity score matching, the N-I group had a significantly higher ICU mortality (15.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.025) and poorer survival rates (log-rank p = 0.040) than the N-N group. The length of ICU stay was significantly longer in the I-I group than in the N-N group (10 vs. 7, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Insulin treatment was associated with increased ICU mortality rate and longer length of ICU stay among critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes. Caution is warranted for the regular application of insulin in critical patients with type 2 diabetes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Crisman ◽  
Luca Lucchetta ◽  
Nora Luethi ◽  
Luca Cioccari ◽  
Que Lam ◽  
...  

Endocrine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolò Buetti ◽  
Pierpaolo Trimboli ◽  
Timothy Mazzuchelli ◽  
Elia Lo Priore ◽  
Carlo Balmelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The length of time a critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient remains infectious and should therefore be isolated remains unknown. This prospective study was undertaken in critically ill patients to evaluate the reliability of single negative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in lower tracheal aspirates (LTA) in predicting a second negative test and to analyze clinical factors potentially influencing the viral shedding. Methods From April 9, 2020 onwards, intubated COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit were systematically evaluated for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs and LTA. The time to negativity was defined as the time between the onset of symptoms and the viral clearance in LTA. In order to identify risk factors for prolonged viral shedding, we used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results Forty-eight intubated SARS-CoV-2 patients were enrolled. Overall, we observed that the association of the first negative RT-PCR with a second negative result was 96.7%. Median viral shedding was 25 (IQR: 21.5–28) days since symptoms’ onset. In the univariate Cox model analysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with a prolonged viral RNA shedding (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.06–3.11, p = 0.04). In the multivariate Cox model analysis, type 2 diabetes was associated with a prolonged viral RNA shedding (HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.89, p = 0.029). Conclusion Intubated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may have prolonged SARS-CoV-2 shedding. In critically ill COVID-19 patients, one negative LTA should be sufficient to assess and exclude infectivity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Alexis P Poole ◽  
◽  
Mark E Finnis ◽  
James Anstey ◽  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Contemporary glucose management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes is based on trial data derived predominantly from patients without type 2 diabetes. This is despite the recognition that patients with type 2 diabetes may be relatively more tolerant of hyperglycaemia and more susceptible to hypoglycaemia. It is uncertain whether glucose targets should be more liberal in patients with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To detail the protocol, analysis and reporting plans for a randomised clinical trial — the Liberal Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients with Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes (LUCID) trial — which will evaluate the risks and benefits of targeting a higher blood glucose range in patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: A multicentre, parallel group, open label phase 2B randomised controlled clinical trial of 450 critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to liberal blood glucose (target 10.0–14.0 mmol/L) or usual care (target 6.0–10.0 mmol/L). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint is incident hypoglycaemia (< 4.0 mmol/L) during the study intervention. Secondary endpoints include biochemical and feasibility outcomes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The study protocol and statistical analysis plan described will delineate conduct and analysis of the trial, such that analytical and reporting bias are minimised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN No. 12616001135404) and has been endorsed by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eray Yagmur ◽  
David Buergerhausen ◽  
Ger H. Koek ◽  
Ralf Weiskirchen ◽  
Christian Trautwein ◽  
...  

The adipokine family of C1q/TNF-like proteins (CTRP) plays a critical role in regulating systemic energy homeostasis and insulin sensitivity. It is involved in pathophysiological processes including inflammation and insulin-resistant obesity. Sepsis is associated with metabolic alterations and dysregulated adipokines, but the role of CTRP1 in critical illness and sepsis is unclear. We investigated CTRP1 plasma concentrations in 145 septic and 73 non-septic critically ill patients at admission to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) in comparison to 66 healthy controls. We also assessed associations of CTRP1 with clinical characteristics, adipokine levels, metabolic and inflammatory parameters. CTRP1 plasma concentration was significantly elevated in critically ill patients compared to healthy subjects. CTRP1 levels were significantly higher in ICU patients with sepsis. CTRP1 correlated strongly with markers of inflammatory response, renal function, liver damage and cholestasis. Furthermore, CTRP1 levels were higher in ICU patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and correlated with HbA1c and body mass index. This study demonstrates significantly elevated levels of CTRP1 in critically ill patients, particularly with sepsis, and links circulating CTRP1 to inflammatory and metabolic disturbances.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document