325-OR: Genetic and Socioeconomic Factors Are Independently Associated with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 325-OR
Author(s):  
SARA JANE CROMER ◽  
CHIRAG M. LAKHANI ◽  
JOSEP M. MERCADER ◽  
TIM MAJARIAN ◽  
JOSE C. FLOREZ ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Malik ◽  
H Chen ◽  
A Cooper ◽  
M Gomes ◽  
V Hejjaji ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), optimal management of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is critical for primary prevention of CV disease. Purpose To describe the association of country income and patient socioeconomic factors with risk factor control in patients with T2D. Methods DISCOVER is a 37-country, prospective, observational study of 15,983 patients with T2D enrolled between January 2016 and December 2018 at initiation of 2nd-line glucose-lowering therapy and followed for 3 years. In patients without known CV disease with sub-optimally controlled risk factors at baseline, we examined achievement of risk factor control (HbA1c <7%, BP <140/90 mmHg, appropriate statin) at the 3 year follow-up. Countries were stratified by gross national income (GNI)/capita, per World Bank report. We explored variability across countries in risk factor control achievement using hierarchical logistic regression models and examined the association of country- and patient-level economic factors with risk factor control. Results Among 9,613 patients with T2D but without CV disease (mean age 57.2 years, 47.9% women), 83.1%, 37.5%, and 66.3% did not have optimal control of glucose, BP, and statins, respectively, at baseline. Of these, 40.8%, 55.5%, and 28.6% achieved optimal control at 3 years of follow-up. There was substantial variability in achievement of risk factor control across countries (Figure) but no association of country GNI/capita on achievement of risk factor control (Table). Insurance status, which differed substantially by GNI group, was strongly associated with glycemic control, with no insurance and public insurance associated with lower odds of patients achieving HbA1c <7%. Conclusions In a global cohort of patients with T2D, a substantial proportion do not achieve risk factor control even after 3 years of follow-up. The variability across countries in risk factor control is not explained by the GNI/capita of the country. Proportion of patients at goal Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The DISCOVER study is funded by AstraZeneca


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Mitchell ◽  
Alexa Bragg ◽  
Ioana Moldovan ◽  
Shakiyla Woods ◽  
Katherine Melo ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Background: The development of evidence-based care geared towards Black/African American and Latina women living with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes is contingent upon their active recruitment into clinical interventions. Well-documented impediments to recruitment include a historical mistrust of the research community and socioeconomic factors that limit awareness and access to research studies. While sociocultural and socioeconomic factors deter minorities from participating in clinical research, it is equally important to consider the role of stigma in chronic disease intervention studies. OBJECTIVE Objective: We aim to share our discovery of diabetes-related stigma as an under-recognized impediment to recruitment for the Women in Control 2.0 virtual diabetes self-management education study. METHODS Methods: Our initial recruitment plan utilized traditional strategies to recruit minority women with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, including letters and phone calls to targeted patients, referrals from clinicians, and posted flyers. After engaging a patient advisory group and consulting with experts in community advocacy, diabetes-related stigma emerged as a prominent barrier to recruitment. The study team reviewed and revised recruitment scripts and outreach material in order to better align with the lived experience and needs of potential enrollees. RESULTS Results: Utilizing a more nuanced, community-centered recruitment approach, we achieved our target recruitment goal, enrolling 309 participants into the study, exceeding our target of 212. CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: There is a need for updated recruitment methods that can increase research participation of patients who experience internalized diabetes stigma. In order to address disparities in minority health, further research is needed to better understand diabetes-related stigma and devise strategies to avert or address it. CLINICALTRIAL NCT02726425


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Yokoyama ◽  
Tatsuo Yamamoto ◽  
Michio Tanaka ◽  
Chieko Kudo ◽  
Koichi Hidaka ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Leao ◽  
Julian Perelman ◽  
Manuela Felício ◽  
Vasco Machado ◽  
Graça Lima

Introduction: Diabetes and hypertension are highly prevalent conditions in Portugal. Little is known about the geographical and social patterning of these diseases, which precludes the design of targeted health policies. This study aimed to measure the geographical and socioeconomic distribution of type 2 diabetes and hypertension prevalence in the population resident in the Northern region of Portugal, for the year 2013.Material and Methods: An ecological correlation study analyzed the 2,028 parishes of the region. Prevalence data were obtained from the Regional Health Administration information system. Socioeconomic data were also obtained from this administrative database and from the 2011 national census. The association between each socioeconomic indicator and age-standardized prevalence was measured using the difference in prevalence, population attributable risk, relative inequality index, and regression coefficient.Results: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension was 6.16% and 19.35%, respectively, and varied across parishes. These prevalences were significantly associated with low educational level, low tertiary sector weight, unemployment, and low-income rate (with prevalence differences between the most and least advantaged deciles up to 1.3% and 5.3%, respectively). Socioeconomic factors accounted for up to 20% of prevalence.Discussion: This study design did not allow us to evaluate causality and it may underestimate these diseases prevalence or its association with socioeconomic factors, but its results are in line with the evidence from other countries.Conclusion: These results emphasize the socioeconomic and geographical patterning of major diseases associated with a high mortality, and the need of health policies targeting the most deprived parishes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document