Response to Intensive Therapy Steps and to Glipizide Dose in Combination With Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes: VA feasibility study on glycemic control and complications (VA CSDM)

Diabetes Care ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Abraira ◽  
W. G. Henderson ◽  
J. A. Colwell ◽  
F. Q. Nuttall ◽  
J. P. Comstock ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-91
Author(s):  
Inna Igorevna Klefortova

Current article presents data on effects of intensive glycemic control with Diabeton MR on development and progression of diabeticnephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), accumulated from ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease:Preterax and DiamicroN Modified Release Controlled Evaluation study). Influence of intensive therapy with Diabeton MR wasassessed in that study separately and in conjunction with active antihypertensive treatment with perindopril and indapamide.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Guzman ◽  
Grenye O’Malley ◽  
Abigail Tamru ◽  
Carol Joan Levy ◽  
David Lam

Abstract Background: Multiple studies have shown that intensive glycemic control leads to improved HbA1c and delays the onset of complications in diabetes.1 However, improvement in glycemic control has also been associated with weight gain.1 The High A1C (HAC) program uses a multidisciplinary team to provide intensive therapy to patients with HbA1C ≥ 10% over 3 months to improve glycemic control. The aim of this retrospective study is to examine if the HAC program is associated with a significant change in weight and BMI. Methods: Patients enrolled in the HAC program were scheduled for frequent visits over the course of 3 months with an Endocrinologist, nurse practitioner, or diabetes educator. Data from patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled from March 2018 to June 2019 who attended at least 2 appointments was collected. Pre-enrollment HbA1c, weight, BMI, and total daily dose (TDD) of insulin (units/kg/day) were compared to post-enrollment using t-test analysis. Use of weight-lowering anti-hyperglycemic agents such as Metformin, GLP-1 agonists (GLP1A) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was collected. Results: 44 patients were enrolled with 39/44 (88.6%) attending at least 2 visits and 5/44 (11.3%) who were lost to follow-up. The median HbA1c improved from 11.5% (9.7-14%) to 8.4% (5.9-14%), p<0.001.There was no significant change in mean weight (195lbs (110-360) vs 192lbs (114-358), p=0.14) or BMI (31 (20-49) vs 31 (21-49) kg/m2, p=0.86). Pre-enrollment, 33/39 (84.6%) patients were on Metformin, 10/39 (25.6%) were on a GLP1A, and 3/39 (7.7%) were on a SGLT2i. At the end of the program, there were 34/39 (87%) patients on Metformin, 26/39 (66.6%) on a GLP1A, and 17/39 (43.5%) on a SGLT2i. There was no difference in the mean TDD of insulin at the start of the program of 0.63 units/kg/day (0-3.52 units/kg/day) compared to 0.60 units/kg/day (0-4.07 units/kg/day) at the end of the program (p=0.97). Conclusions: Patients enrolled in a high intensity glycemic control program had significant improvements in HbA1c without change in weight or BMI. Additional adjunctive non-insulin therapies and lifestyle management may be contributing factors for weight neutrality in our population. The significant improvement in HbA1c was not linked with increases in TDD of insulin. Citation: 1.“U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Intensive blood glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with convention treatment and risk of complications in patients with Type 2 Diabetes.” Lancet, vol.353, 1998, pp.837-53.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Alamer ◽  
Charles Palm ◽  
Abdulaziz S. Almulhim ◽  
Charisse Te ◽  
Merri L. Pendergrass ◽  
...  

Short message service (SMS) is easily accessible and potentially an ideal platform for delivering patient-targeted messages. However, an effective SMS dosing strategy is not well established. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of diabetes self-care promoting messages via non-tailored one-way automated SMS (OASMS) on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was compared between patients who received the service and those who did not. This retrospective quasi-experimental pre–post feasibility study was conducted at an academic medical center endocrinology clinic. English-speaking adults (≥18 years) with uncontrolled T2DM (HbA1c ≥ 8%) were included. A total of 69 patients (intervention n = 34; control n = 35) met the inclusion criteria. The mean (±SD) baseline HbA1c values were 10.2% (±1.9%) and 9.9% (±1.7%) in the intervention and control arms, respectively. Median follow-up was 3.3 months (IQR = 3–4.2). An ANCOVA model adjusted for baseline HbA1c and age showed an estimated HbA1c reduction difference of −0.97% (95% CI, −1.73 to −0.20%, p = 0.014), favoring the intervention arm. Inverse propensity score weighting confirmed the ANCOVA results. Our study suggests that adding diabetes self-care promoting messages via non-tailored OASMS to usual care improves glycemic control in poorly controlled T2DM. Larger and longer studies are needed to evaluate different features of the non-tailored OASMS strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document