scholarly journals Screening and Treatment Outcomes in Adults and Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Asymptomatic Celiac Disease: The CD-DIET Study

Author(s):  
Farid H. Mahmud ◽  
Antoine B.M. Clarke ◽  
Kariym C. Joachim ◽  
Esther Assor ◽  
Charlotte McDonald ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: To describe Celiac Disease (CD) screening rates and glycemic outcomes of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in type 1 diabetes patients asymptomatic for CD. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: Asymptomatic patients (8-45 years) were screened for CD. Biopsy-confirmed CD participants were randomized to GFD or gluten-containing diet (GCD) to assess changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) over 12 months. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Adults had higher CD-seropositivity rates than children (6.8%, 95%CI 4.9% to 8.2%, N=1298 vs. 4.7%; 95%CI 3.4% to 5.9%, N=1089, p=0.035) with lower rates of prior CD-screening (6.9% vs 44.2%, p<0.0001). 51 participants were randomized to a GFD (N=27) or GCD (N=24). No HbA1c differences were seen between groups (+0.14%, 1.5mmol/mol; 95%CI: -0.79 to 1.08; p=0.76) although greater post-prandial glucose increases (4-hr +1.5mmol/L; 95%CI: 0.4 to 2.7; p=0.014) emerged with a GFD.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: CD is frequently observed in asymptomatic patients with type 1 diabetes and clinical vigilance is warranted with initiation of a GFD. </p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid H. Mahmud ◽  
Antoine B.M. Clarke ◽  
Kariym C. Joachim ◽  
Esther Assor ◽  
Charlotte McDonald ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: To describe Celiac Disease (CD) screening rates and glycemic outcomes of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in type 1 diabetes patients asymptomatic for CD. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: Asymptomatic patients (8-45 years) were screened for CD. Biopsy-confirmed CD participants were randomized to GFD or gluten-containing diet (GCD) to assess changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) over 12 months. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Adults had higher CD-seropositivity rates than children (6.8%, 95%CI 4.9% to 8.2%, N=1298 vs. 4.7%; 95%CI 3.4% to 5.9%, N=1089, p=0.035) with lower rates of prior CD-screening (6.9% vs 44.2%, p<0.0001). 51 participants were randomized to a GFD (N=27) or GCD (N=24). No HbA1c differences were seen between groups (+0.14%, 1.5mmol/mol; 95%CI: -0.79 to 1.08; p=0.76) although greater post-prandial glucose increases (4-hr +1.5mmol/L; 95%CI: 0.4 to 2.7; p=0.014) emerged with a GFD.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: CD is frequently observed in asymptomatic patients with type 1 diabetes and clinical vigilance is warranted with initiation of a GFD. </p>


Diabetes Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1553-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid H. Mahmud ◽  
Antoine B.M. Clarke ◽  
Kariym C. Joachim ◽  
Esther Assor ◽  
Charlotte McDonald ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N Shah

Objective: To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of CGM initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes. <p>Research Design and Methods: 396 patients with type 1 diabetes were divided into three groups; 1) CGM [CGM use within one year of diabetes and continued through the study], 2) no-CGM [no CGM use throughout the study], 3) new-CGM [CGM use after 3 years of diabetes] and were followed up to 7-years. </p> <p>Results: A1c was significantly lower in CGM compared to no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up [LS mean A1cs (%): 6-month 7.3 vs 8.1, 1-year 7.4 vs 8.6, 2-year 7.7 vs 9.1, 3-year 7.6 vs 9.3, 4-year 7.4 vs 9.6, 5-year 7.6 vs 9.7, 6-year 7.5 vs 10.0 and 7-year 7.6 vs 9.8, all p<0.001] adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. </p> <p>Conclusion: CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes results in long-term improvement in A1c. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N Shah

Objective: To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of CGM initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes. <p>Research Design and Methods: 396 patients with type 1 diabetes were divided into three groups; 1) CGM [CGM use within one year of diabetes and continued through the study], 2) no-CGM [no CGM use throughout the study], 3) new-CGM [CGM use after 3 years of diabetes] and were followed up to 7-years. </p> <p>Results: A1c was significantly lower in CGM compared to no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up [LS mean A1cs (%): 6-month 7.3 vs 8.1, 1-year 7.4 vs 8.6, 2-year 7.7 vs 9.1, 3-year 7.6 vs 9.3, 4-year 7.4 vs 9.6, 5-year 7.6 vs 9.7, 6-year 7.5 vs 10.0 and 7-year 7.6 vs 9.8, all p<0.001] adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. </p> <p>Conclusion: CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes results in long-term improvement in A1c. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N Shah

Objective: To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of CGM initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes. <p>Research Design and Methods: 396 patients with type 1 diabetes were divided into three groups; 1) CGM [CGM use within one year of diabetes and continued through the study], 2) no-CGM [no CGM use throughout the study], 3) new-CGM [CGM use after 3 years of diabetes] and were followed up to 7-years. </p> <p>Results: A1c was significantly lower in CGM compared to no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up [LS mean A1cs (%): 6-month 7.3 vs 8.1, 1-year 7.4 vs 8.6, 2-year 7.7 vs 9.1, 3-year 7.6 vs 9.3, 4-year 7.4 vs 9.6, 5-year 7.6 vs 9.7, 6-year 7.5 vs 10.0 and 7-year 7.6 vs 9.8, all p<0.001] adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. </p> <p>Conclusion: CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes results in long-term improvement in A1c. </p>


Diabetes Care ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K. Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N. Shah

OBJECTIVE To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 1 diabetes (N = 396) were divided into three groups: 1) CGM (CGM use within 1 year of diabetes diagnosis and continued through the study); 2) no-CGM (no CGM use throughout the study); and 3) new-CGM (CGM use after 3 years since diabetes diagnosis). Patients were followed up to 7 years. RESULTS A1c was significantly lower in the CGM compared with the no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up (least squares mean A1c values: 6 months, 7.3% vs. 8.1%; 1 year, 7.4% vs. 8.6%; 2 years, 7.7% vs. 9.1%; 3 years, 7.6% vs. 9.3%; 4 years, 7.4% vs. 9.6%; 5 years, 7.6% vs. 9.7%; 6 years, 7.5% vs. 10.0%; and 7 years, 7.6% vs. 9.8%; for all, P &lt; 0.001) adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. CONCLUSION CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes diagnosis results in long-term improvement in A1c.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1579-P
Author(s):  
MICHELLE GOULD ◽  
FARID H. MAHMUD ◽  
ANTOINE B. CLARKE ◽  
ESTHER ASSOR ◽  
AMISH PARIKH ◽  
...  

Bone ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliana Valerio ◽  
Raffaella Spadaro ◽  
Dario Iafusco ◽  
Francesca Lombardi ◽  
Antonio del Puente ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vi Lier Goh ◽  
D. Elizabeth Estrada ◽  
Trudy Lerer ◽  
Fabiola Balarezo ◽  
Francisco A. Sylvester

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Assor ◽  
Margaret A. Marcon ◽  
Natasha Hamilton ◽  
Marilyn Fry ◽  
Tammy Cooper ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document