scholarly journals Continuous Glucose Monitoring Initiation Within First Year of Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis Is Associated With Improved Glycemic Outcomes: 7-Year Follow-Up Study

Diabetes Care ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K. Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N. Shah

OBJECTIVE To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 1 diabetes (N = 396) were divided into three groups: 1) CGM (CGM use within 1 year of diabetes diagnosis and continued through the study); 2) no-CGM (no CGM use throughout the study); and 3) new-CGM (CGM use after 3 years since diabetes diagnosis). Patients were followed up to 7 years. RESULTS A1c was significantly lower in the CGM compared with the no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up (least squares mean A1c values: 6 months, 7.3% vs. 8.1%; 1 year, 7.4% vs. 8.6%; 2 years, 7.7% vs. 9.1%; 3 years, 7.6% vs. 9.3%; 4 years, 7.4% vs. 9.6%; 5 years, 7.6% vs. 9.7%; 6 years, 7.5% vs. 10.0%; and 7 years, 7.6% vs. 9.8%; for all, P < 0.001) adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. CONCLUSION CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes diagnosis results in long-term improvement in A1c.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N Shah

Objective: To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of CGM initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes. <p>Research Design and Methods: 396 patients with type 1 diabetes were divided into three groups; 1) CGM [CGM use within one year of diabetes and continued through the study], 2) no-CGM [no CGM use throughout the study], 3) new-CGM [CGM use after 3 years of diabetes] and were followed up to 7-years. </p> <p>Results: A1c was significantly lower in CGM compared to no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up [LS mean A1cs (%): 6-month 7.3 vs 8.1, 1-year 7.4 vs 8.6, 2-year 7.7 vs 9.1, 3-year 7.6 vs 9.3, 4-year 7.4 vs 9.6, 5-year 7.6 vs 9.7, 6-year 7.5 vs 10.0 and 7-year 7.6 vs 9.8, all p<0.001] adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. </p> <p>Conclusion: CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes results in long-term improvement in A1c. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N Shah

Objective: To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of CGM initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes. <p>Research Design and Methods: 396 patients with type 1 diabetes were divided into three groups; 1) CGM [CGM use within one year of diabetes and continued through the study], 2) no-CGM [no CGM use throughout the study], 3) new-CGM [CGM use after 3 years of diabetes] and were followed up to 7-years. </p> <p>Results: A1c was significantly lower in CGM compared to no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up [LS mean A1cs (%): 6-month 7.3 vs 8.1, 1-year 7.4 vs 8.6, 2-year 7.7 vs 9.1, 3-year 7.6 vs 9.3, 4-year 7.4 vs 9.6, 5-year 7.6 vs 9.7, 6-year 7.5 vs 10.0 and 7-year 7.6 vs 9.8, all p<0.001] adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. </p> <p>Conclusion: CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes results in long-term improvement in A1c. </p>


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anagha Champakanath ◽  
Halis Kaan Akturk ◽  
G. Todd Alonso ◽  
Janet K Snell-Bergeon ◽  
Viral N Shah

Objective: To evaluate long-term glycemic outcomes of CGM initiation within the first year of type 1 diabetes. <p>Research Design and Methods: 396 patients with type 1 diabetes were divided into three groups; 1) CGM [CGM use within one year of diabetes and continued through the study], 2) no-CGM [no CGM use throughout the study], 3) new-CGM [CGM use after 3 years of diabetes] and were followed up to 7-years. </p> <p>Results: A1c was significantly lower in CGM compared to no-CGM group throughout 7 years of follow-up [LS mean A1cs (%): 6-month 7.3 vs 8.1, 1-year 7.4 vs 8.6, 2-year 7.7 vs 9.1, 3-year 7.6 vs 9.3, 4-year 7.4 vs 9.6, 5-year 7.6 vs 9.7, 6-year 7.5 vs 10.0 and 7-year 7.6 vs 9.8, all p<0.001] adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insulin delivery method. </p> <p>Conclusion: CGM initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes results in long-term improvement in A1c. </p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid H. Mahmud ◽  
Antoine B.M. Clarke ◽  
Kariym C. Joachim ◽  
Esther Assor ◽  
Charlotte McDonald ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: To describe Celiac Disease (CD) screening rates and glycemic outcomes of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in type 1 diabetes patients asymptomatic for CD. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: Asymptomatic patients (8-45 years) were screened for CD. Biopsy-confirmed CD participants were randomized to GFD or gluten-containing diet (GCD) to assess changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) over 12 months. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Adults had higher CD-seropositivity rates than children (6.8%, 95%CI 4.9% to 8.2%, N=1298 vs. 4.7%; 95%CI 3.4% to 5.9%, N=1089, p=0.035) with lower rates of prior CD-screening (6.9% vs 44.2%, p<0.0001). 51 participants were randomized to a GFD (N=27) or GCD (N=24). No HbA1c differences were seen between groups (+0.14%, 1.5mmol/mol; 95%CI: -0.79 to 1.08; p=0.76) although greater post-prandial glucose increases (4-hr +1.5mmol/L; 95%CI: 0.4 to 2.7; p=0.014) emerged with a GFD.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: CD is frequently observed in asymptomatic patients with type 1 diabetes and clinical vigilance is warranted with initiation of a GFD. </p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 602-612
Author(s):  
Dirk Sandig ◽  
Julia Grimsmann ◽  
Christina Reinauer ◽  
Andreas Melmer ◽  
Stefan Zimny ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Dehn-Hindenberg ◽  
Heike Saßmann ◽  
Verena Berndt ◽  
Torben Biester ◽  
Bettina Heidtmann ◽  
...  

<b>OBJECTIVE</b> <p>To investigate the occupational and financial consequences for parents following the onset of type 1 diabetes in their child. </p> <p><b>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</b> </p> <p>A questionnaire assessing occupational and financial situations before and in the first year after the onset of diabetes was distributed to all families with a child ≤14 years of age at diagnosis with a diabetes duration of at least 12 months in nine German pediatric diabetes centers. </p> <p><b>RESULTS</b></p> <p>Data of 1,144 children (mean age at diagnosis 6.7 (3.6) years, 46.5% female) and their families were obtained. Mothers’ occupational status reflected in paid working hours was significantly reduced in the first year after their child's diabetes diagnosis (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Overall, 15.1% of mothers stopped working, and 11.5% reduced working hours. Mothers of preschool children were particularly affected. Fathers’ working status hardly changed (<i>P</i> = 0.75). Nearly half of the families (46.4%) reported moderate to severe financial losses. Compared to an earlier similar study in 2003, significant negative occupational consequences for mothers and financial burden on families remain unchanged in 2018 (<i>P</i> = 0.59 & 0.31, respectively).</p> <p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p> <p>Mothers of young children with newly diagnosed diabetes experienced negative consequences in their occupational situation. This inequality for mothers can have long-term negative consequences for their mental health and future economic situation. There is an urgent need for action to reduce the burden on families and to provide professional, social, and regulatory support especially for mothers of young children with diabetes. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document