scholarly journals Clinical effectiveness of an interdisciplinary pain management programme compared with standard inpatient rehabilitation in chronic pain: A naturalistic, prospective controlled cohort study

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 569-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Angst ◽  
ML Verra ◽  
S Lehmann ◽  
R Brioschi ◽  
A Aeschlimann
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo John Pimm ◽  
Laura Juliette Williams ◽  
Megan Reay ◽  
Stephen Pickering ◽  
Ranjeeta Lota ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chronic pain is one of the most prevalent causes of disability worldwide, and digital interventions may be one of the ways to meet this need. Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that digital interventions can be effective in treating chronic pain. This study aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of a web-based pain management programme (PMP), specifically whether it would lead to improved clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: Of 738 participants, 438 engaged with the programme and 300 did not. Two analyses were conducted: a within-subjects pre–post comparison of clinical outcomes for participants who completed the programme and a between-groups comparison of health care usage for those who engaged and those who did not. Results: Participants who completed the programme made significant improvements with regard to their perceived health status, level of disability, mood, confidence managing pain, problems in life due to pain and level of pain. Around one-third of participants made reliable changes in their levels of disability, depression and anxiety. There was no relationship between gender or age and engagement with the programme. Those who engaged with the programme demonstrated reduced health care costs in the year following referral, whereas health care costs of non-engagers increased. Limitations of the study include a high drop-out rate and a non-randomised comparison group. Results must therefore be interpreted with some caution. Conclusion: A web-based pain management programme can be clinically effective and may be a useful addition to the treatments offered by pain management services.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth J Guildford ◽  
Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt ◽  
Bethany Hill ◽  
Karen Sanderson ◽  
Lance M McCracken

Long-term use of opioid medication is associated with a host of negative effects on health and quality of life. Guidelines state that people with chronic pain taking high doses of opioids without benefit should be supported to discontinue them. Little research has investigated psychological processes associated with analgesic use and tapering. This study investigated (1) analgesic use pre- and post-participation in an interdisciplinary pain management programme and its relationship to functioning and (2) psychological processes associated with analgesic use. Opioid use was associated with poorer functioning at baseline. Participating in an interdisciplinary pain management programme was associated with reductions in opioid dose and number of classes of analgesics used. Reductions in analgesic use were associated with improvements in functioning. Psychological inflexibility was associated with using higher doses of opioid medication and with using a greater number of classes of analgesics. Psychological flexibility appears relevant in explaining analgesic use. Future research could focus on targeting this process to improve tapering outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E573-E579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Romman

Background: Background: Intravenous lidocaine has multiple applications in the management of acute and chronic pain. Mexiletine, an oral lidocaine analogue, has been used in a number of chronic pain conditions although its use is not well characterized. Objectives: To report our experience using mexiletine in a chronic pain population, specifically looking at tolerability, side effects, and EKG changes. Study Design: Retrospective, cohort study. Setting: Multiple pain clinic locations in an integrated multispecialty health system. Methods: All patients who had a mexiletine prescription between August 2015 and August 2016 were queried via the electronic medical record. Each chart was examined for demographics, QTc changes on EKG, length of use, and reasons for stoppage. Results:There were 74 total patients identified in the chronic pain management clinics as receiving at least 1 mexiletine prescription over the 1-year time period. Twice as many women as men received mexiletine prescriptions. Neuropathic pain was the most common primary diagnosis (64%) which included diabetic neuropathy, radiculopathy, and others. Fibromyalgia was the next most common primary diagnosis (28%). A QTc change on the EKG showed a mean decrease of 0.1 ms and median increase of 1.5 ms. At 6 months (180 days), approximately 30% of the patients remained on mexiletine therapy, and 28% remained on the therapy at 1 year (360 days). Median duration of use was 60 days and the mean was 288 days. Neurologic and gastrointestinal side effects were the most commons reason for stoppage. All side effects were mild and resolved with stoppage. After side effects, lack of response, or loss of efficacy, were the next most common reasons for stoppage. Limitations: Pain relief and outcomes were not specifically examined due to confounding factors including interventional treatments and multiple treatment modalities. This was a retrospective, cohort study limited to our specific clinic population with a relatively high loss to follow-up rate. Conclusion:Mexiletine is rarely a first line option for chronic pain management and is often used when multiple other modalities have failed. By reporting our experience, we hope other clinicians may have more familiarity with the drug’s use in a chronic pain practice. It appears reasonably tolerable, may not require frequent EKG monitoring, and can be an appropriate adjunct in the chronic pain population. More research is needed regarding efficacy and dose titration for mexiletine in chronic pain. Key Words: Chronic pain, mexiletine, IV lidocaine, pain, neuropathic pain, neuropathy, fibromyalgia, QTc, tolerability


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Gersch ◽  
Thomas Delate ◽  
Karly M. Bergquist ◽  
Karen Smith

1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 283-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Collins ◽  
Alan Carr ◽  
Declan Q’Keefe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document