Ceramic laminate veneers: effect of preparation design and ceramic thickness on fracture resistance and marginal quality in vitro

Clinical Relevance For fracture resistance and the marginal integrity of adhesively bonded partial ceramic crowns (PCC), the choice of ceramic thickness and luting material are more important than preparation design. PCC fabricated from industrially sintered feldspathic ceramic should have at least a thickness of 1.5–2.0 mm in stress bearing areas.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of fracture resistance of Cerasmart and lithium disilicate ceramic veneers with different incisal preparation designs: an in vitro study

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.20103.1 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 1491 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bushra Mohammed ◽

Jylan EL-Guindy

Keyword(s):

Hybrid Material ◽

Fracture Resistance ◽

Testing Machine ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Lithium Disilicate ◽

Fracture Load ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Preparation Design ◽

Laminate Veneers

Background: Cerasmart hybrid material offers specific advantages such as less fragility and more flexibility than glass ceramics. This material also has the option of readily modifying or repairing the surface and favorable stress-absorbing characteristics. In our study, Cerasmart hybrid and lithium disilicate ceramic laminate veneers with two different preparation designs were compared with regards to their fracture resistance. Methods: A total of 52 of comparable human central maxillary incisors were used. Group A (n=26) was made up of Cerasmart hybrid ceramic laminate veneers were fabricated from Cerasmart blocks, while Group B (n=26) was made up of lithium disilicate ceramic laminate veneers were made of IPS e.max pressable ingots. Each group was subdivided in two equal subgroups according to preparation designs. Subgroup I comprised Featheredge preparation design and subgroup II: Wraparound preparation design. All samples were subjected to thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C in a water bath for a total of 1750 cycle with 10 seconds dwell time at each bath. The fracture load strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between all groups. E.max wraparound group recorded the highest fracture resistance mean value (422.1 N) followed by Cerasmart wraparound group (317.23 N), then e.max featheredge group (289.6 N), and finally Cerasmart featheredge group (259.3 N) had the lowest value as analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Conclusions: The Cerasmart hybrid material could be considered as a valid alternative to the widely used IPS e.max material. The fracture resistance of laminate veneers is not influenced by different type of preparation designs.

Download Full-text

Passo a passo clínico dos laminados estéticos: uma alternativa restauradora em dentes anteriores

ARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATION ◽

10.21270/archi.v8i9.3231 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (9) ◽

Author(s):

Allany Oliveira Andrade ◽

Ana Vitória Leite Luna ◽

Isabela Alcântara Farias ◽

Marcelo Gadelha Vasconcelos ◽

Rodrigo Gadelha Vasconcelos

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Sao Paulo ◽

Resin Cement ◽

São Paulo ◽

Resin Cements ◽

Functional Rehabilitation ◽

Anterior Teeth ◽

Ceramic Thickness ◽

Laminate Veneers

A Odontologia restauradora deve ser praticada da forma mais conservadora possível. Os laminados cerâmicos, usualmente conhecidos como lentes de contato, são considerados uma boa opção para os procedimentos estéticos, pois o seu preparo é limitado ao esmalte, o que os tornam uma abordagem conservadora. Este trabalho objetiva sintetizar informações de bases científicas que corroborem sobre os laminados cerâmicos com ênfase no seu passo a passo clínico. Em reabilitações com laminados estéticos devem ser selecionadas corretamente os casos clínicos e o tipo de cerâmica mais indicada, pois estas se diferem entre si em suas propriedades mecânicas e estéticas. Além disso, o preparo dentário, quando houver, deve ser de até 0,5mm de espessura. Para a moldagem, o material de escolha deve ser de qualidade, onde o mais indicado é a silicona de adição devido a suas propriedades superiores. No que concerne à etapa de cimentação a técnica que associa o ácido hidrofluorídrico, silano e cimento resinoso promove excelente desempenho clínico em longo prazo, podendo chegar a 90% de sucesso clínico após 13 anos de acompanhamento.Descritores: Prótese Dentária; Estética Dentária; Cerâmica; Facetas Dentárias.ReferênciasTurgut S, Bagis B. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(3):179–86.Andrade AO, Silva IVS, Vasconcelos MG, Vasconcelos RG. Cerâmicas odontológicas: classificação, propriedades e considerações clínicas. SALUSVITA. 2017;36(4):1129-52.Souza ROA, Miyashita E. Lentes de contato cerâmicas como alternativa para correção de giroversões e diastemas em área estética. Prótesenews.2014;1(1):38-50.Alhekeir DF, Al-Sarhan RA, Al Mashaan AF. Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):63-7.Kumar GV, Poduval TS, Reddy B, Reddy S. A study on provisional cements, cementation techniques, and their effects on bonding of porcelain laminate veneers. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(1):42-9.Soares PV, Spini PH, Carvalho VF, Souza PG, Gonzaga RC, Tolentino AB et al. Esthetic rehabilitation with laminated ceramic veneers reinforced by lithium disilicate. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(2):129-33.Giray EF, Duzdar L, Oksuz M, Tanboga I. Evaluation of the bond strength of resin cements used to lute ceramics on laser-etched dentin. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(7):413-21.Miyashita E, Oliveira GG. Odontologia estética: os desafios da clínica diária. São Paulo: Napoleão; 2014.Vieira D, Monsores VV. Metal Free - Lentes de contato e coroas totais. São Paulo: Santos; 2013.Anusavice JK, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips Materiais Dentários. São Paulo: Saunders Elservier; 2013.Bottino MA. Percepção: estética em próteses livres de metal em dentes naturais e Implantes. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2009.Greco DG, Carvalho RAC, Silva MD. Odontologia de alta performance: laminados cerâmicos ultra conservadores. São Paulo: Napoleão; 2015.Monteiro J, Polo GG. Effect of ceramic thickness and cement shade on the final shade after bonding using the 3D master system: a laboratory study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016;2(1):57-64.Sapata A, Costa JA, Lenza VJ, Francci CE, Witzel MF, Lodovici E. Lentes de contato: harmonização do sorriso sem desgaste dental. clin int j braz dent. 2013;9(2):154-63.Calixto LR, Bandeca MC, Andrade MF. Enceramento diagnóstico: previsibilidade no tratamento estético indireto. R dental press estét. 2011;8(4):26-37.Baratieri LN, Chain MC. Odontologia restauradora: fundamentos e possibilidades. 2.ed. São Paulo: Santos; 2015.Farias Neto A, Gomes EMCF, Sánchez Ayala A, Sánchez Ayala A, Vilanova LSR. Esthetic rehabilitation of the smile with no-prep porcelain laminates and partial veneers. Case Rep Dent. 2015; 2015: 452765Vanlıoğlu BA, Kulak-Özkan Y. Minimally invasive veneers: current state of the art. Clin Cosmet Investig dent. Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2014;6:101-7.Alves RH, Venâncio GN, Meira JF, Toda C, Conde NCO, Bandeira MFCL. Aesthetic and functional rehabilitation with Alumina: a case report. Reabilitação estética e funcional com Alumina. Braz Dent Sci. 2016;19(4):119-24.Higashi C, Silva MJ, Gomes JC. Preservação da normalidade do periodonto após procedimentos restauradores. Rev Dicas. 2012;1:20-3.Korkut B, Yanikoğlu F, Günday M. Direct Composite Laminate Veneers. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(2):105-11.Pini NP, Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL, Lovadino JR, Terada RSS, Pascotto RC. Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2012; 4:9–16Van Noort R. Introdução aos materiais dentários. São Paulo: Mosby elservier 3º ed; 2010.Cardoso PC, Decurcio RA, Lopes LG, Souza JB. Importância da Pasta de Prova (Try-In) na cimentação de facetas cerâmicas – relato de caso. ROBRAC 2011;20(53):166-71.Amoroso AP, Ferreira MB, Torcato LB, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JVQ, Gennari Filho H. Cerâmicas odontológicas: propriedades, indicações e considerações clínicas. Rev Odontol Araçatuba. 2012;33(2):19-25.Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295-314.Alavi AA, Behroozi Z, Nik Eghbal F. The shear bond strength of porcelain laminate to prepared and unprepared anterior teeth. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18(1):50-5.

Download Full-text

Fracture Resistance of Composite Veneers with Different Preparation Designs

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine ◽

10.1515/bjdm-2016-0016 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 20 (2) ◽

pp. 99-103

Author(s):

Katerina Zlatanovska ◽

Ljuben Guguvcevski ◽

Risto Popovski ◽

Cena Dimova ◽

Ana Minovska ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fracture Resistance ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Fracture Load ◽

Group 3 ◽

The Mean ◽

Group 2 ◽

Preparation Design ◽

Frequent Localization ◽

Group 1

Summary Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the fracture load of composite veneers using three different preparation designs. Material and methods: Fifteen extracted, intact, human maxillary central incisors were selected. Teeth were divided into three groups with different preparation design: 1) feather preparation, 2) bevel preparation, and 3) incisal overlap- palatal chamfer. Teeth were restored with composite veneers, and the specimens were loaded to failure. The localization of the fracture was recorded as incisal, gingival or combined. Results: Composite veneers with incisal overlap - palatal chamfer showed higher fracture resistance compared to feather preparation and bevel preparation. The mean (SD) fracture loads were: Group 1: 100.6±8.0 N, Group 2: 107.4±6.8 N, and Group 3: 122.0±8.8 N. The most common mode of failure was debonding for veneers with feather preparation and fracture when incisal edge is reduced. The most frequent localization of fracture was incisal. Conclusion: The type of preparation has a significant effect on fracture load for composite veneers. This study indicates that using an incisal overlap- palatal chamfer preparation design significantly increases the fracture resistance compared to feather and bevel preparation designs.

Download Full-text

Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: An in vitro study

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry ◽

10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60039-6 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 109 (3) ◽

pp. 179-186 ◽

Cited By ~ 51

Author(s):

Sedanur Turgut ◽

Bora Bagis

Keyword(s):

In Vitro Study ◽

Resin Cement ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Ceramic Thickness ◽

Laminate Veneers ◽

Final Color

Download Full-text

Comparative Evaluation of Resistance Failure in Nonprecious Metal-Ceramic Restoration at the Incisal Edge with Varying Thickness under Different Application of Load: An in vitro Study

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1072 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 12 (6) ◽

pp. 434-440

Author(s):

Zinnie Nanda ◽

Prasanna M Danappanavar ◽

Mummidi Bhaskar ◽

Vikas Gowd ◽

Mallikarjun Molugu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fracture Resistance ◽

Comparative Evaluation ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Varying Thickness ◽

Incisal Edge ◽

Group I ◽

Metal Ceramic ◽

Ceramic Thickness ◽

Nonprecious Metal

ABSTRACT Objective To determine the resistance failure value of nonprecious metal-ceramic restorations at the incisal edge with varying thickness under different application of load. Materials and methods An Ivorian central incisor was prepared to receive metal-ceramic crown, which was further duplicated, invested, casted and 72 metal dies were fabricated in Co-Cr alloy. Metal dies were relieved with die spacer, lubricated and wax patterns were prepared for metal copings, which were further invested and casted and 72 metal copings were fabricated. The ceramic materials were used for the study viz. Vita/VMK, IPSd SIGN, and superporcelain. Ceramic built-up was carried out according to manufacturer instructions. Incisal ceramic built-up was carried out with increasing thickness from 2.00 to 2.5 and 3.00 mm. Results A total of 72 samples, prepared for the study, were divided into two groups, i.e. group I (36 samples) and group II (36 samples), as per the direction of application of load. The samples were mounted on acrylic block (6 samples/block). A total 12 acrylic blocks were prepared. All the samples were tested using universal testing machine (MTS/USA). The load was applied with crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Conclusion Fracture resistance was found to be highest for the 2.00 mm and lowest for 3.00 mm incisal ceramic thickness samples regardless of the ceramic material in both groups. There was a gradual decrease in fracture resistance as the incisal ceramic thickness increased from 2.00 to 3.00 mm in all samples. Fracture resistance was marginally higher for incisal ceramic build-up of 3 mm thickness on group II metal copings than on group I copings. Fracture resistance was highest for IPSd SIGN followed by that of Vita/VMK-95 and superporcelain. Clinical significance A 3.00 mm incisal ceramic thickness offered greater fracture resistance in comparison to lower values of incisal thickness; IPSd SIGN offered greatest fracture resistance followed by that of Vita/VMK-95 and superporcelain. How to cite this article Danappanavar PM, Nanda Z, Bhaskar M, Gowd V, Molugu M, Reddy KA, Reddy RK, Kumar MA. Comparative Evaluation of Resistance Failure in Nonprecious Metal-Ceramic Restoration at the Incisal Edge with Varying Thickness Under Different Application of Load: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(6):434-440.

Download Full-text