scholarly journals Surface Treatments for Improving Bond Strength to Prefabricated Fiber Posts: A Literature Review

10.2341/07-86 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Monticelli ◽  
R. Osorio ◽  
F. T. Sadek ◽  
I. Radovic ◽  
M. Toledano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesion Mechanism ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Reinforced Composite

Clinical Relevance Several surface treatments have been proposed for improving the bonding of resin cements or core materials to FRC (fiber-reinforced composite) posts. The possibility of combining chemical and micromechanical retention on post surface provides the most promising adhesion mechanism.

Bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite to root canal dentin following cyclic loading

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (13) ◽  
pp. 1397-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Nagas ◽  
Isil Cekic-Nagas ◽  
Ferhan Egilmez ◽  
Gulfem Ergun ◽  
Pekka K. Vallittu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Short Fiber ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Root Canal Dentin

scholarly journals Comparison of Self-Etching Ceramic Primer and Conventional Silanization to Bond Strength in Cementation of Fiber Reinforced Composite Post

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1585
Author(s):  
Nan-Sim Pang ◽  
Bock-Young Jung ◽  
Byoung-Duck Roh ◽  
Yooseok Shin
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Adhesive Bonding ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Push Out

Various mechanical and chemical surface treatments have been proposed to improve the retention of fiber-reinforced composite post (FRCP), but the results are still controversial. The bond strength and durability of a self-etching ceramic primer, which was recently released as an alternative to etching and silane, are not yet known. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the push-out bond strength of different surface treatments of FRCPs after an artificial aging procedure. Four groups (n = 10) were established to evaluated FRCP surface treatments (dentin adhesive bonding; silane and adhesive bonding; hydrofluoric acid, silane and adhesive bonding; and a self-etching ceramic primer). They were bonded with dual-curing rein cement (Multilink N) and stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 30 days, then thermal cycled for 7500 cycles. After being sectioned into 1 mm thickness, each coronal and apical part was evaluated for its the push-out bond strength by a universal testing machine. Each debonded specimen was observed by an optical microscope and divided according to the failure modes. The results showed that silane treatment significantly improved push-out bond strength, but the self-etching ceramic primer did not do so. Additional hydrofluoric acid treatment or the adhesive bonding agent alone did not significantly improve the retention of FRCPs. Cohesive failure of the luting material was found most frequently in all groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document