scholarly journals Bond strength of a new Kevlar fiber-reinforced composite post with semi-interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) matrix

2019 ◽  
pp. e695-e700
Author(s):  
AG Almaroof ◽  
SA Thyab ◽  
AH Ali
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Polymer Network ◽  
Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Kevlar Fiber ◽  
Reinforced Composite

Bond Strength of Composite Resin Luting Cements to Fiber-reinforced Composite Root Canal Post

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lippo Lassila ◽  
Anna-Maria Le Bell-Rönnlöf ◽  
Milla Lahdenperä ◽  
Pekka Vallittu
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to compare the attachment of different composite resin luting cements to a fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) post with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network polymer matrix. Methods and Materials Six different brands of composite resin luting cement stubs were applied on the surface of FRC post material and light-cured for 40 seconds. Shear bond strengths of luting cement stubs were measured using a universal testing machine. Results The differences in shear bond strengths between the cements were not statistically significant. Conclusion All of the tested composite resin luting cements provided acceptable attachment to the tested FRC post. The tested FRC post material is suitable to use with different composite resin luting cements. Citation Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM, Lahdenperä M, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Bond Strength of Composite Resin Luting Cements to Fiber-reinforced Composite Root Canal Post. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:017-024.

scholarly journals Interfacial Adhesion of a Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Network-Based Fiber-Reinforced Composite with a High and Low-Gradient Poly(methyl methacrylate) Resin Surface

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 352
Author(s):  
Aftab Ahmed Khan ◽  
Leila Perea-Lowery ◽  
Abdulaziz Abdullah Al-Khureif ◽  
Nawaf Abdulrahman AlMufareh ◽  
ElZahraa Eldwakhly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Adhesion ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Polymer Network ◽  
Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Dependent Relationship ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Reinforcing Fiber

The research aimed to determine the tensile bond strength (TBS) between polymerized intact and ground fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) surfaces. FRC prepregs (a reinforcing fiber pre-impregnated with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN) resin system; everStick C&B) were divided into two groups: intact FRCs (with a highly PMMA-enriched surface) and ground FRCs (with a low PMMA gradient). Each FRC group was treated with: StickRESIN and G-Multi PRIMER. These groups were further divided into four subgroups based on the application time of the treatment agents: 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 min. Next, a resin luting cement was applied to the FRC substrates on the top of the photo-polymerized treating agent. Thereafter, weight loss, surface microhardness, and TBS were evaluated. Three-factor analysis of variance (p ≤ 0.05) revealed significant differences in the TBS among the FRC groups. The highest TBS was recorded for the intact FRC surface treated with G-Multi PRIMER for 2 min (13.0 ± 1.2 MPa). The monomers and solvents of G-Multi PRIMER showed a time-dependent relationship between treatment time and TBS. They could diffuse into the FRC surface that has a higher PMMA gradient, further resulting in a high TBS between the FRC and resin luting cement.

scholarly journals Effects of Fiber-reinforced Composite Bases on Microleakage of Composite Restorations in Proximal Locations

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tezvergil-Mutluay A ◽  
Vallittu P.K
Keyword(s):  
Intermediate Layer ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Polymer Network ◽  
Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Particulate Filler ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of direct restorative composite resin upon the addition of an intermediate glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC) layer of various fiber orientations between tooth and particulate filler composite resin (PFRC). Materials and Methods: Cavities were prepared both on the mesial and distal surfaces of sixty extracted human molars with one margin placed below and the other above the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Teeth were assigned to five different groups. Four of the groups received a layer of semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN) resin system impregnated E-glass GFRC at the bottom of the cavity: Group 1; unidirectional continuous GFRC (EVS) in buccolingual direction (EVS-BL), Group 2; EVS in mesiodistal direction (EVS-MD), Group 3; bidirectional woven GFRC (EVN), Group 4; multidirectional short GFRC (EXP-MLT), Group 5; PRFC only (control). After acid etching and priming of the cavities and insertion of GFRC layer with the adhesive resin (Scotchbond Multipurpose 3M-ESPE), the cavities were filled incrementally with PRFC (Filtek Z250, 3M-ESPE) and each layer was light cured for 20 s. After finishing and polishing, the restored teeth were water-stored for 24 h at 37 °C and then thermocycled for 6000 cycles between 5-55 °C, before immersion in 0.5 % basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After sectioning by 3-5 sagittal cuts, each sequential section was imaged and digitally analyzed to determine the stain depth. Results: All GFRC groups in dentin revealed significantly lower microleakage compared to control (p<0.05). The orientation of FRC intermediate layer did not reveal significant differences in microleakage (p>0.05). The microleakeage in enamel was not different between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Use of intermediate GFRC layer between tooth and PFRC could provide alternative method to minimize microleakage. Clinical Relevance: Use of GFRC intermediate layer underneath the particulate filler composite can be used to minimize the leakeage of the restorations.

Short Glass Fiber-reinforced Composite with a Semi-interpenetrating Polymer Network Matrix for Temporary Crowns and Bridges

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sufyan Garoushi ◽  
Pekka K. Vallittu ◽  
Lippo V. J. Lassila
Keyword(s):  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Polymer Network ◽  
Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Short Glass Fiber ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Short Glass

Abstract Aims The purpose of this study was to investigate the reinforcement effect of short E-glass fiber fillers on some mechanical properties of temporary crown and bridge (TCB) composite resin with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN). Methods and Materials Experimental temporary fiber reinforced (TFC) composite resin was prepared by mixing 15 wt% of short E-glass fibers (3 mm in length) with a 35 wt% of semi-IPN-resin (dual or chemical cure) with 50 wt% of silane treated particulate silica fillers using a high speed mixing device. Temporary crowns (n=6) and test specimens (2 × 2 × 25 mm3) (n=6) were made from the experimental TFC and conventional TCB composite (control, Protemp Garant, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). A three-point bending test was done according to ISO standard 10477, and a compression loading test was carried out using a steel ball (Ø 3.0 mm) with a speed of 1.0 mm/min until fracture occurred. The degree of monomer conversion (DC%) of both composites was determined by Fourier transfer infrared (FTIR) spectrometry. Results The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed both dual and chemical cure experimental TFC composite resins had statistically significant (p<0.05) higher flexural strengths (117 and 99 MPa, respectively) and compressive load-bearing capacity (730 and 623 N, respectively) compared to the control TCB composite resin (72 MPa, 549 N). Conclusion The use of short fiber fillers with semi-IPN polymer matrix yielded an improved mechanical performance compared to a conventional TCB composite resin. Citation Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Short Glass Fiber-reinforced Composite with a Semi-interpenetrating Polymer Network Matrix for Temporary Crowns and Bridges. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 January; (9)1:014-021.

Effect of aging and testing method on bond strength of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite to dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1690-1701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Fracassi de Oliveira Lino ◽  
Camila Moreira Machado ◽  
Vitor Guarçoni de Paula ◽  
Hugo Alberto Vidotti ◽  
Paulo G. Coelho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Cad Cam

scholarly journals Effect of silane activation on shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite post to resin cement

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Dong Kim ◽  
Joo-Hee Lee ◽  
Kang-Min Ahn ◽  
Hee-Sun Kim ◽  
Hyun-Suk Cha
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite

scholarly journals Surface Treatments for Improving Bond Strength to Prefabricated Fiber Posts: A Literature Review

10.2341/07-86 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Monticelli ◽  
R. Osorio ◽  
F. T. Sadek ◽  
I. Radovic ◽  
M. Toledano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesion Mechanism ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Reinforced Composite

Clinical Relevance Several surface treatments have been proposed for improving the bonding of resin cements or core materials to FRC (fiber-reinforced composite) posts. The possibility of combining chemical and micromechanical retention on post surface provides the most promising adhesion mechanism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document