Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Composites in Posterior Restorations: Two-year Results

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Arhun ◽  
C. Celik ◽  
K. Yamanel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Posterior Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Nanohybrid and low-shrinkage posterior resin composites, placed with self-etch adhesive systems in posterior teeth, showed satisfactory and similar results after two years.

Clinical Evaluation of a Two-step Etch&Rinse and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive System in Class II Restorations: Two-year Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Ermis ◽  
O. Kam ◽  
E. U. Celik ◽  
U. B. Temel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The two-step etch&rinse and the two-step self-etch adhesive systems tested in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in Class II cavities after two years.

Clinical Evaluation of Silorane-based Resin Composites in the Posterior Teeth: An 18 Months Follow-up Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Mohammed Almuhaiza
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Biological Fluid ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Clinical Evaluations ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Aqueous Environments ◽  
Posterior Restorations

ABSTRACT The silorane-based resin composites have low polymerization shrinkage and stress, good stability in aqueous environments and insolubility in biological fluid stimulants compared with conventional dimethacrylate based composites. The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate the performance of silorane-based resin over a period of 18 months. The study was conducted in ten posterior restorations performed with silorane. Clinical evaluations were done periodically to evaluate the success of the restorations using predefined criteria. Eight out of ten restorations fulfilled all criteria up to 18 months. Two restorations had marginal chipping of the composite material. From this short-term clinical study, it can be concluded that siloranes can be used as an alternative to other posterior restorative composites. Further research over longer periods with larger samples are required to substantiate the current observations. How to cite this article Almuhaiza M. Clinical Evaluation of Silorane-based Resin Composites in the Posterior Teeth: An 18 Months Follow-up Study. World J Dent 2016;7(2):69-72.

Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled Fissure Sealant Placed with Different Adhesive Systems: 24-month Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 642-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Yazici ◽  
E. Karaman ◽  
M. Baseren ◽  
D. Tuncer ◽  
E. Yazici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The use of an etch-and-rinse adhesive prior to the placement of sealants yielded better retention than did the use of a self-etch adhesive.

Adhesive Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin Using Recommended and Extended Treatment Times

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Kimmes ◽  
W. W. Barkmeier ◽  
R. L. Erickson ◽  
M. A. Latta
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Adhesive Bond ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Tooth Surfaces ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Self-etch adhesive systems are promoted as being more efficient for bonding procedures by using fewer treatment steps to condition tooth surfaces for bonding resin-based materials. Concern has been expressed regarding the ability of the newer self-etch adhesives to yield strong, durable bonds when compared to more traditional etch-and-rinse systems. Extending the treatment time of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives does not appear to result in relevant increases in the bond strength of resin composites to enamel or dentin.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Posterior Resin Composites With and Without Liner Using Two-Step Etch-and-Rinse and Self-etch Dentin Adhesive Systems

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kasraei ◽  
M Azarsina ◽  
S Majidi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Sandwich Technique ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

Clinical Relevance The use of resin-modified glass ionomers as cavity liners in the closed-sandwich technique reduced microleakage in Class II composite restorations.

Microleakage After Thermocycling of 4 Etch and Rinse and 3 Self-etch Adhesives With and Without a Flowable Composite Lining

10.2341/05-55 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Guéders ◽  
J. F. Charpentier ◽  
A. I. Albert ◽  
S. O. Geerts
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Composite Lining ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance This study indicates that etch and rinse adhesive systems are less prone to microleakage than self-etch systems.

Influence of Adhesive Systems on Interfacial Dentin Gap Formation In Vitro

10.2341/05-53 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Loguercio ◽  
A. Reis ◽  
G. Bortoli ◽  
R. Patzlaft ◽  
S. Kenshima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Etch & rinse systems showed better initial interfacial adaptation than self-etch systems. The differences disappeared after 6-months water storage. The thicker the hybrid layer formed by self-etching adhesives, the lower the immediate gap formation.

Clinical Evaluation of Using Etch and Rinse and Self Etch Adhesive Systems on Primary Molars for One Year

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Al-Tinawi ◽  
Arwa Khir ◽  
Hala Al-Edlebi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
One Year ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Marginal Permeability of Self-etch and Total-etch Adhesive Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Owens ◽  
W. W. Johnson ◽  
E. F. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Anatomy ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Decreased leakage was associated with Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (total etch) and iBond (self-etch) systems in Class V resin composite restorations. All adhesive systems performed best when bonded to enamel compared to dentin surface anatomy. Clinicians should be aware that strict adherence to manufacturer instructions, when using these materials, is of primary importance.

Influence of Delayed Placement of Composites Over Cured Adhesives on Dentin Bond Strength of Single-application Self-etch Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Asaka ◽  
M. Miyazaki ◽  
T. Takamizawa ◽  
K. Tsubota ◽  
B. K. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Single Application ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The delay in placement of composite over single-application self-etching adhesive systems was a crucial factor influencing dentin bond strength compared to a composite placed immediately after the polymerization of adhesives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document