In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluations of Microleakage Around Class I Amalgam and Composite Restorations

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Alptekin ◽  
F. Ozer ◽  
N. Unlu ◽  
N. Cobanoglu ◽  
M. B. Blatz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Amalgam Restorations

Clinical Relevance The lining of amalgam restorations showed no significant effect on microleakage around restoration margins. In vivo and in vitro evaluations confirmed that microleakage was higher in resin composite restorations than in amalgam.

In Vivo Chlorhexidine Stabilization of Hybrid Layers of an Acetone-based Dentin Adhesive

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Brackett ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
W. W. Brackett ◽  
A. Dib ◽  
F. A. Dipp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Chlorhexidine Digluconate ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Extensive Degradation ◽  
One Year ◽  
Hybrid Layers ◽  
Dentin Adhesive

Clinical Relevance Extensive degradation of dentin hybrid layers formed with an acetone-based dentin adhesive beneath Class I resin composite restorations was evident after one year unless the teeth received an application of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate after etching.

scholarly journals Effects of Total and Selective Bonding on Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Class I Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
T. Huber ◽  
T. N. Göhring ◽  
T. Attin ◽  
A. Bindl
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance Within the limitations of the current study, the use of glass ionomer liners improves the margin quality of Class I resin composite restorations and reduces leakage.

The Effect of Chlorhexidine on Dentin Hybrid Layers In Vivo

10.2341/06-55 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Brackett ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
M. G. Brackett ◽  
A. Dib ◽  
R. J. Sword ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Chlorhexidine Digluconate ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Hybrid Layers

Clinical Relevance Degradation of dentin hybrid layers in Class I resin composite restorations is minimal over six months but is lessened by the application of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate after etching.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

Survival rates of resin composite restorations in loadbearing situations in posterior teeth

Dental Update ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Trevor Burke ◽  
Louis Mackenzie ◽  
Adrian CC Shortall
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Amalgam Restorations

The use of resin composite for routine restoration of cavities in posterior teeth is now commonplace, and will increase further following the Minamata Agreement and patient requests for tooth-coloured restorations in their posterior teeth. It is therefore relevant to evaluate the published survival rates of such restorations. A Medline search identified 144 possible studies, this being reduced to 24 when inclusion criteria were introduced. Of these, ten directly compared amalgam and composite, eight were cohort studies, and six were systematic reviews. It was concluded that posterior composites may provide restorations of satisfactory longevity and with survival rates generally similar to those published on amalgam restorations. However, the ability of the operator in placing the restoration may have a profound effect. CPD/Clinical Relevance: With the increasing use of composite for restorations in posterior teeth, it is relevant to note that these may provide good rates for survival.

scholarly journals Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal Coverage Direct Resin Composite Restorations

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Stavridakis ◽  
A. I. Kakaboura ◽  
S. Ardu ◽  
I. Krejci
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Important Influence ◽  
Class I ◽  
Bonding Layer ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Internal Adaptation

Clinical Relevance C-factor has an important influence on marginal and internal adaptation in large posterior cavities. A thick bonding layer does not optimize adaptation in Class I restorations.

scholarly journals Class II resin composite restorations—tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Preusse ◽  
Julia Winter ◽  
Stefanie Amend ◽  
Matthias J. Roggendorf ◽  
Marie-Christine Dudek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

scholarly journals Complicações associadas a restaurações realizadas em áreas de contato interproximal

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandson Cleyton Ferreira da Silva Oliveira ◽  
Rauhan Gomes de Queiroz ◽  
Basilio Rodrigues Vieira ◽  
Elizandra Silva Penha ◽  
Luanna Abílio Diniz Melquíades de Madeiros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Caries ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Caries Experience ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Postural Changes

Introdução: Diversas complicações estão associadas a restaurações realizadas em áreas de contato interproximal levando a tratamentos restauradores insatisfatórios, que poderão acarretar o surgimento de diversas complicações, desde retenção alimentar até formação de bolsas periodontais com perda óssea. Objetivo: Avaliar na literatura quais as principais complicações associadas a restaurações realizadas em áreas de contato interproximal. Metodologia: Realizou-se uma pesquisa de trabalhos nas seguintes bases de dados eletrônica: Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Biblioteca Eletrônica Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), PubMed e Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia (BBO), entre os anos de 2000 a 2018. Resultados: A busca das bases de dados eletrônicas recuperou 97 artigos. Após a leitura do título e resumo, leitura na íntegra e aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão foi selecionado um total de 14 estudos. Conclusão: Complicações estão associadas às diferentes etapas do tratamento restaurador interproximal, indo desde o difícil diagnóstico à verificação da adaptação marginal. O estabelecimento de ponto de contato com dispositivos foi a complicação mais encontrada.Descritores: Adaptação Marginal Dentária; Falha de Restauração Dentária; Restauração Dentária Permanente.ReferênciasFejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidds E. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.Hopcraft MS, Morgan MV. Pattern of dental caries experience on tooth surfaces in an adult population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(3):174–83.Skold UM. On caries prevalence and schoo-based fluoride programmes in Swedish adolescente. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2005;1(178):11-75.Scholtanus JD, Özcan M. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. J Dent. 2014;42(11):1404-10.Melo P, Manarte P, Domingues J, Coelho S, Teixeira L. Técnica para obtenção do ponto de contacto em restaurações de classe II com compósito. Rev Fac Ciênc Sáude. 2005;2(1):63-72.Santos MJMC. A restorative approach for class ii resin composite restorations: a two-year follow-up. Oper Dent. 2015;40(1):19-24.Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ, Pioch T. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strengths. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108(5):368-77.Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Brinkhorst EM, Plasschaert AJM. The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness. J Dent. 2007;35(2):104-08.Cho SD; Browning WD, Walton KS. Clinical use of a sectional matrix and ring. Oper Dent. 2010;35(5):587-91.Meneghel LL, Wang L, Lopes MB, Gonini Junior A.  Interproximal space recovery using an orthodontic elastic separator before prosthetic restoration: a case report. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(1):79-82.Wirsching E, Loomans BAC, Klaiber B, Dörfer CE. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2-and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 2011;39(5):386-90.Saber MH, El-Bradawy W, Loomans BAC, Ahamed DR, Dörfer CE, El Zohairy A. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations. Oper Dent, 2011;36(3):304-10.Costa TA, Raitz R, Belan LC, Matson MR. Análise do contorno da face proximal obtido em restaurações classe II de resina composta utilizando-se dois tipos diferentes de matrizes metálicas. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 2009;21(1):31-7.Patras M, Doukoudakis S. Class II composite restorations and proximal concavities: clinical implications and management. Oper Dent. 2013;38(2):119-24.Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JOC; Rodrigues JR. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(10):785-89.Kim HS, Na HJ, Kim HJ, Kang DW, Oh SH. Evaluation of proximal contact strength by postural changes. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009;1(3):118-23.El-Shamy H, Saber M, Dörfer CE, El-Bradawy W, Loomans BAC. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):205-10.Teich ST, Joseph J, Sartori N, Heima M, Duarte S. Dental floss selection and its impact on evaluation of interproximal contacts in licensure exams. J Dent Educ, 2014;78(6):921-26.Moreira MA, Larentis NL, Arossi GA, Rodruigues ED, Bortoli FR, Haas MF. A radiografia interproximal é necessária para confirmar a adaptação clínica de restaurações proximais com resinas compostas em dentes posteriores? RFO UPF. 2015;20(1):69-74.

scholarly journals Correction to: Class II resin composite restorations—tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Preusse ◽  
Julia Winter ◽  
Stefanie Amend ◽  
Matthias J. Roggendorf ◽  
Marie-Christine Dudek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

A Review of Mechano-Biochemical Models for Testing Composite Restorations

2021 ◽  
pp. 002203452110269
Author(s):  
A. Zhang ◽  
N. Ye ◽  
W. Aregawi ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
M. Salah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Data ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Models ◽  
Laboratory Studies ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Modes Of Failure ◽  
The Individual

Due to the severe mechano-biochemical conditions in the oral cavity, many dental restorations will degrade and eventually fail. For teeth restored with resin composite, the major modes of failure are secondary caries and fracture of the tooth or restoration. While clinical studies can answer some of the more practical questions, such as the rate of failure, fundamental understanding on the failure mechanism can be obtained from laboratory studies using simplified models more effectively. Reviewed in this article are the 4 main types of models used to study the degradation of resin–composite restorations, namely, animal, human in vivo or in situ, in vitro biofilm, and in vitro chemical models. The characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of these models are discussed and compared. The tooth–restoration interface is widely considered the weakest link in a resin composite restoration. To account for the different types of degradation that can occur (i.e., demineralization, resin hydrolysis, and collagen degradation), enzymes such as esterase and collagenase found in the oral environment are used, in addition to acids, to form biochemical models to test resin–composite restorations in conjunction with mechanical loading. Furthermore, laboratory tests are usually performed in an accelerated manner to save time. It is argued that, for an accelerated multicomponent model to be representative and predictive in terms of both the mode and the speed of degradation, the individual components must be synchronized in their rates of action and be calibrated with clinical data. The process of calibrating the in vitro models against clinical data is briefly described. To achieve representative and predictive in vitro models, more comparative studies of in vivo and in vitro models are required to calibrate the laboratory studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document