scholarly journals Anesthetic Considerations for Patients on Antidepressant Therapy – Part II

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mana Saraghi ◽  
Leonard Golden ◽  
Elliot V. Hersh
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Antidepressant Activity ◽  
The United States ◽  
General Anesthetics ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Menstrual Symptoms ◽  
Anesthetic Considerations ◽  
Expansive Group

Millions of patients take antidepressant medications in the United States for the treatment of depression or anxiety disorders. Some antidepressants are prescribed off-label to treat problems such as chronic pain, low energy, and menstrual symptoms. Antidepressants are a broad and expansive group of medications, but the more common drug classes include tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. A miscellaneous or “atypical” category covers other agents. Some herbal supplements that claim to have antidepressant activity will also be discussed. Part I of this series reviewed antidepressant pharmacology, adverse effects, and drug interactions with adrenergic agonists. In part II, drug–drug interactions with sedation and general anesthetics, bleeding effects, and serotonin syndrome will be discussed.

scholarly journals Anesthetic Considerations for Patients on Antidepressant Therapy—Part I

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mana Saraghi ◽  
Leonard R. Golden ◽  
Elliot V. Hersh
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Antidepressant Activity ◽  
The United States ◽  
General Anesthetics ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Menstrual Symptoms ◽  
Anesthetic Considerations ◽  
Expansive Group

Millions of patients take antidepressant medications in the United States for the treatment of depression or anxiety disorders. Some antidepressants are prescribed off-label to treat problems such as chronic pain, low energy, and menstrual symptoms. Antidepressants are a broad and expansive group of medications, but the more common drug classes include tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. A miscellaneous or “atypical” category covers other agents. Some herbal supplements that claim to have antidepressant activity will also be discussed. In Part I of this review, antidepressant pharmacology, adverse effects, and drug interactions with adrenergic agonists will be discussed. In part II, drug interactions with sedation and general anesthetics will be reviewed. Bleeding effects and serotonin syndrome implications in anesthetic practice will also be highlighted.

scholarly journals Treatment patterns and sequences of pharmacotherapy for patients diagnosed with depression in the United States: 2014 through 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
M. Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Frank Defalco ◽  
Mila Etropolski
Keyword(s):  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Antidepressant Medication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
First Line ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalization ◽  
Class Level ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Antidepressive Treatment

Abstract Background Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression. Methods Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014–1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and 3 years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up. Results We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29 to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line. Conclusions Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.

Everyday Problems in Treating Depression: Focus on SNRIs

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (S11) ◽  
pp. 4-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegfried Kasper
Keyword(s):  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Antidepressant Activity ◽  
New Class ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor ◽  
Dual Action ◽  
Everyday Problems ◽  
Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor ◽  
Poor Tolerability ◽  
Norepinephrine Reuptake

Most effective antidepressants directly or indirectly increase the synaptic concentrations of serotonin (5-HT) and/or norepinephrine (NE) by blocking the reuptake of one or both of the neurotransmitters. This property was initially discovered with the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Their various additional interactions at different receptors and ion channels are not required for antidepressant action, but are responsible for the poor tolerability and toxicity in overdose of the early antidepressants.The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective and well tolerated. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as reboxetine, also have proven antidepressant activity. A selective action on one or the other of the principal monoamines thus appears to be sufficient for antidepressant activity. The idea that a dual action on both neurotransmitters might produce greater efficacy in certain patients led to the development of the serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressants, which block the reuptake of both 5-HT and NE without the nonspecific, side-effect–inducing interactions of the TCAs. The three SNRIs—venlafaxine, milnacipran, and duloxetine—constitute a new class of antidepressants.Antidepressant response rates rarely exceed 60% to 70% and remission rates are usually <50%. Although SNRIs clearly provide superior efficacy in certain populations, their use has not dramatically changed antidepressant therapy. The search for agents that are more effective, rapidly acting, and better tolerated continues. However, clinicians must find ways to better use the antidepressants that are available today. This supplement, based on a symposium held at the International Forum on Affective Disorders in Budapest in December 2007, discusses several everyday problems in the treatment of depression, with a focus on SNRIs.

Consumer Advertising of Psychiatric Medications Biases the Public Against Nonpharmacological Treatment

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Lacasse
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Nonpharmacological Treatment ◽  
The Public ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Direct To Consumer Advertising

In the United States, aWntidepressant medications are heavily promoted through direct-to-consumer advertising, which is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Advertisements for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors frequently contain information inconsistent with the scientific evidence on the treatment of depression with antidepressants. The information presented serves to promote the use of antidepressants by biasing the public against nonpharmacological treatment of depression. While the FDA enforces regulations requiring fair and balanced presentation when comparing one medication to another, there appears to be no action taken against pharmaceutical companies that distort scientific evidence in order to disparage nonmedical approaches to depression.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Sequences of Pharmacotherapy for Patients Diagnosed with Depression in the United States: 2014 through 2019

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
M. Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Frank Defalco ◽  
Mila Etropolski
Keyword(s):  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Tricyclic Antidepressants ◽  
Antidepressant Medication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalization ◽  
Class Level ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Antidepressive Treatment

Abstract Background : Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression. Methods : Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014-1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and three years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics . Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up. Results : We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression . The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 31% to 54%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes was relatively uncommon across all treatment lines. Conclusions : Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.

scholarly journals A review of significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with antidepressants and their management

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charity Hoffelt ◽  
Tonya Gross
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Patient Response ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Profiles ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Term Management ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Drug

Abstract Treatment of depression often requires long-term management with medication. Practitioners should be aware of potentially significant drug interactions with the use of antidepressants in order to effectively prevent or manage adverse events while optimizing patient response to treatment. Most antidepressants are metabolized by the liver, primarily via the CYP450 system. Pharmacokinetic profiles of the most recently approved antidepressants are reviewed in addition to evidence supporting potentially significant interactions. In addition, pharmacokinetic interactions between multiple antidepressants and other drug classes, including opiates, antineoplastics, antiepileptics, and antipsychotics, are discussed. This article provides recommendations for the monitoring and management of drug interactions. In addition, limitations of the evidence are reviewed.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Sequences of Pharmacotherapy for Patients Diagnosed with Depression in the United States: 2014 through 2019

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
M. Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Frank Defalco ◽  
Mila Etropolski
Keyword(s):  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Antidepressant Medication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
First Line ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalization ◽  
Class Level ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Antidepressive Treatment

Abstract Background: Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression. Methods: Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014-1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and three years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up. Results: We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29% to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line. Conclusions: Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Sequences of Pharmacotherapy for Patients Diagnosed with Depression in the United States: 2014 through 2019

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
M. Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Frank Defalco ◽  
Mila Etropolski
Keyword(s):  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Antidepressant Medication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
First Line ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalization ◽  
Class Level ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Antidepressive Treatment

Abstract Background: Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression. Methods: Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014-1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and three years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up. Results: We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29% to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line. Conclusions: Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.

Review on the Clinical Pharmacology of Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate for the Treatment of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Cui ◽  
Siqi Tu ◽  
Valerie Sia Jie En ◽  
Xiaobei Li ◽  
Xueting Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
The United States ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Infected People ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Therapeutic Drugs

Background: As the number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infected people is greatly increasing worldwide, the international medical situation becomes very serious. Potential therapeutic drugs, vaccine and stem cell replacement methods are emerging, so it is urgent to find specific therapeutic drugs and the best treatment regimens. After the publications on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with anti- SARS-COV-2 activity in vitro, a small, non-randomized, open-label clinical trial showed that HCQ treatment was significantly associated with reduced viral load in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Meanwhile, a large prophylaxis study of HCQ sulfate for COVID-19 has been initiated in the United States. HCQ offered a promising efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19, but the optimal administration is still being explored. Methods: We used the keyword "hydroxychloroquine" to conduct a literature search in PubMed to collect relevant literature on the mechanism of action of HCQ, its clinical efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, precautions for clinical use and drug interactions to extract and organize information. Results: This paper reviews the mechanism, clinical efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, exposureresponse relationship and precautions and drug interactions of HCQ, and summarizes dosage recommendations for HCQ sulfate. Conclusion: It has been proved that HCQ, which has an established safety profile, is effective against SARS-CoV-2 with sufficient pre-clinical rationale and evidence. Data from high-quality clinical trials are urgently needed worldwide.

scholarly journals Descriptors of Cytochrome Inhibitors and Useful Machine Learning Based Methods for the Design of Safer Drugs

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 472
Author(s):  
Tyler C. Beck ◽  
Kyle R. Beck ◽  
Jordan Morningstar ◽  
Menny M. Benjamin ◽  
Russell A. Norris
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Physiochemical Properties ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes ◽  
Cyp Inhibition ◽  
Cyp Inhibitors

Roughly 2.8% of annual hospitalizations are a result of adverse drug interactions in the United States, representing more than 245,000 hospitalizations. Drug–drug interactions commonly arise from major cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition. Various approaches are routinely employed in order to reduce the incidence of adverse interactions, such as altering drug dosing schemes and/or minimizing the number of drugs prescribed; however, often, a reduction in the number of medications cannot be achieved without impacting therapeutic outcomes. Nearly 80% of drugs fail in development due to pharmacokinetic issues, outlining the importance of examining cytochrome interactions during preclinical drug design. In this review, we examined the physiochemical and structural properties of small molecule inhibitors of CYPs 3A4, 2D6, 2C19, 2C9, and 1A2. Although CYP inhibitors tend to have distinct physiochemical properties and structural features, these descriptors alone are insufficient to predict major cytochrome inhibition probability and affinity. Machine learning based in silico approaches may be employed as a more robust and accurate way of predicting CYP inhibition. These various approaches are highlighted in the review.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document