Medical therapy does not confer stroke prevention for all patients: identification of high-risk patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is still needed

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungho Lim ◽  
Maria Mora-Pinzon ◽  
Taeyoung Park ◽  
William Yoon ◽  
Paul R. Crisostomo ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1429-1430
Author(s):  
Maria Mora Pinzon ◽  
Daniel Zindrick ◽  
Johanna Erstad ◽  
Taeyoung Park ◽  
Pegge Halandras ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrysi Bogiatzi ◽  
Myra S Cocker ◽  
Robert Beanlands ◽  
J David Spence

Neurology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 744-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Madani ◽  
V. Beletsky ◽  
A. Tamayo ◽  
C. Munoz ◽  
J. D. Spence

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul H Damani ◽  
Mahmoud Rayes ◽  
Pratik Bhattacharya ◽  
Seemant Chaturvedi

Objectives: Assess the hypothesis that patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis older than 75 years are not on “best medical therapy” and their operative complication exceeds the AHA/ASA 3% threshold. Background: According to the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS), the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) and recent AHA/ASA guidelines; benefits of carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patient >75 years would be offset if the operative complications rate exceed 3% and it would be more prudent to manage such patients on “best medical therapy”. How often these guidelines are being followed remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective chart review (2009-2011) at three urban, one suburban hospital within 30 miles was performed. Information of carotid revascularization (CEA & CAS) in asymptomatic elderly patients, in-hospital outcomes of stroke/death and/or MI and pre-procedural medications were evaluated. Statistical analysis with chi square testing was used. Results: A total of 114 patients met our inclusion criteria. Their features are described below.At four hospitals, the proportion of carotid revascularization done was 62% (114/185). More then quarter and one-third of patients undergoing carotid revascularization were not on statin and beta-blockers, respectively. Further, the rate of in hospital stroke was 4.4%. Conclusions: The majority of elderly patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients are still undergoing carotid revascularization with operative complications that exceeded the AHA/ASA 3% threshold. More then quarter of patients in this subgroup are not on “best medical therapy”. These results reinforce the need for a new clinical trial comparing aggressive medical therapy alone vs. aggressive medical therapy and revascularization.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F Waters ◽  
Brian L Hoh ◽  
Michael J Lynn ◽  
Tanya N Turan ◽  
Colin P Derdeyn ◽  
...  

Background: The SAMMPRIS trial showed that aggressive medical therapy was more effective than stenting for preventing stroke in high-risk patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. However, 15% of patients in the medical group still had a primary endpoint (any stroke or death within 30 days of enrollment or stroke in the territory beyond 30 days) during a median follow-up of 32.7 months. We sought to determine baseline risk factors that were associated with a primary endpoint in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS. Methods: Data on 227 patients randomized to the medical group in SAMMPRIS were analyzed. Baseline demographic features, vascular risk factors, qualifying event, brain imaging and angiographic features were analyzed. The hazard ratio and p-value from a Cox proportional hazard regression model relating time until a primary endpoint to each factor were calculated. Results: Female gender, diabetes, stroke as the qualifying event (especially non-penetrator stroke), old infarct in the territory of the stenotic artery, and > 80% stenosis were associated (p < 0.10) with a higher risk of the primary endpoint on univariate analysis (see accompanying table) (multivariate analysis will be available by the time of ISC). Variables not associated with a higher risk of a primary endpoint in the medical arm included: age, race, antithrombotic therapy at the time of a qualifying event, time from qualifying event to enrollment (< 7 days vs. > 7 days), and location of stenosis. Conclusions: Several features were associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint in the medical group in SAMMPRIS. On univariate analysis, the most important risk factors were an old infarct in the territory of the stenotic artery and stroke (especially non-penetrator stroke) as the qualifying event. These features will be useful for identifying particularly high-risk patients who should be targeted for future clinical trials testing alternative therapies to aggressive medical management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 1110
Author(s):  
Salomeh Keyhani ◽  
Eric M. Cheng ◽  
Katherine J. Hoggatt ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Erin Madden ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document