scholarly journals Using data to explore vulnerable women's utilization of maternity health care

Author(s):  
Mahnoush Rostami ◽  
Paola Charland ◽  
Ameera Memon

IntroductionInequitable access to appropriate maternity health care is an issue for vulnerable women that negatively impacts health outcomes. As part of a feasibility study on midwifery services for vulnerable women, we used administrative data to further our understanding of socially disadvantaged women’s use of the primary care system during pregnancy. Objectives and ApproachTo better understand maternity health service utilization and social vulnerability of women in Calgary Alberta, a research partnership was formed between Alberta Health Services and a social service agency that serves clients experiencing, poverty, and food insecurity and were at risk for homelessness. This multi-phase study linked postal code data to data from provincial databases. Variables included socioeconomic characteristics, prenatal health care utilization and maternal and birth outcomes for the years 2013 to 2015. ResultsDatabases accessed included the Alberta Perinatal Health Program (APHP), Alberta Health Practitioner Claims Database, AHS Admission Discharge Transfer Database, Discharge Abstracts Database, National Ambulatory Care Reporting, and Provincial Registry Database. Data linkages yielded a total sample size of 7493 women, with 15.5% of women qualifying as ‘socially vulnerable’. Women receiving social assistance are relatively younger, experience more pregnancies, have higher antenatal risk scores and accessed maternal and emergency care more often and later in their pregnancy than those women who are not accessing social services. Our results suggest women living in vulnerable circumstances experience higher risk pregnancies that those not living in vulnerable circumstances. Therefore a maternity care model such as midwifery, which uses a holistic approach to care may be beneficial for vulnerable women. Conclusion/ImplicationsFindings from our study confirm that women experiencing poor social circumstances are at increased risk for complications during pregnancy and birth. Therefore, we need to further investigate utilizing maternity models of care that serve both the maternal health needs and the social needs of this population.

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 652-660
Author(s):  
Lisa Hui ◽  
Emma Szepe ◽  
Jane Halliday ◽  
Celine Lewis

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Choi ◽  
Julia S. Seng

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects 8% of pregnant women, and the biggest risk factor for pregnancy PTSD is childhood maltreatment. The care they receive can lead to positive outcomes or to retraumatization and increased morbidity. The purpose of this study is to gather information from a range of clinicians about their continuing education needs to provide perinatal care to women with a maltreatment history and PTSD.METHOD: Maternity health care professionals were interviewed by telephone. Network sampling and purposive sampling were used to include physicians, nurse practitioners, midwives, nurses, and doulas (n = 20), and results were derived from content analysis.RESULTS: Most providers received little or no training on the issue of caring for women with a history of childhood maltreatment or PTSD during their original education but find working with this type of patient rewarding and wish to learn how to provide better care. Providers identified a range of educational needs and recommend offering a range of formats and time options for learning.CONCLUSIONS: Maternity health care providers desire to work effectively with survivor moms and want to learn best practices for doing so. Thus, educational programming addressing provider needs and preferences should be developed and tested to improve care experiences and pregnancy outcomes for women with a history of trauma or PTSD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 571-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eman Alshawish ◽  
Janet Marsden ◽  
Gill Yeowell ◽  
Christopher Wibberley

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filio Degni ◽  
Sakari B. Suominen ◽  
Walid El Ansari ◽  
Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen ◽  
Birgitta Essen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document