Two approaches to obtain the calibration line

Author(s):  
R. Palencar ◽  
G. Wimmer ◽  
S. Klvacova ◽  
V. Witkovsky
Keyword(s):  
1973 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 355-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu D. Boulanger ◽  
S. N. Shcheglov ◽  
P. Wellman ◽  
D. A. Coutts ◽  
B. C. Barlow

Author(s):  
F.J. Schmuckle ◽  
T. Probst ◽  
U. Arz ◽  
G.N. Phung ◽  
R. Doerner ◽  
...  

Survey Review ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 24 (190) ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. T. Verheijen ◽  
D. E. Ajakaiye
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-251
Author(s):  
L. Solaini ◽  
G. Inghilleri ◽  
G. Togliatti
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (02) ◽  
pp. 178-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
G O Gogstad ◽  
J Wadt ◽  
P Smith ◽  
T Brynildsrud

SummaryThe combined thromboplastin reagent, Normotest, has been calibrated against the secondary international reference preparation for bovine thromboplastin, OBT/79. Three expert laboratories measured up to 62 patients on stabilized oral anticoagulant therapy and up to 20 normals in order to establish an INR-scale for Normotest. It was found that the model recommended by the WHO was less suited for the calibration of this thromboplastin. This is the first study in which three independent laboratories demonstrate a similar bias of the WHO calibration model. A modified model in which a correction factor is introduced was applied to the problem and proved to give a reliable calculation method for INR on Normotest. The mean coefficient of variation of INR calculated between measurements with Normotest and OBT/79 (scatter of data around calibration line) was 4.2-5.0% as compared to 5.1-5.7% for the WHO-method. A conversion scale for percent activities between Normotest and Thrombotest was established showing that the recommended therapeutic range of 5-10% Thrombotest (INR = 4.8-2.8) corresponds to 10-20% Normotest.


2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mocak ◽  
A. Bobrowski

Traditional and the new IUPAC recommended calculation methods for determining the limit of detection and the limit of quantification are applied to the trace determination of cadmium and lead in water. The new method is based on the upper limit approach (ULA), which utilises the one-sided confidence band around the calibration line. The residual standard deviation of the calculated calibration line as well as the t-distribution critical value are used for the calculation of both limits. An appropriate design of the calibration experiment is described. The calculation of both limits in the new way is extremely easy when the calibration experiment is equidistantly designed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document