scholarly journals Design of an Online Curriculum Promoting Transformative Learning in Post Professional Doctoral Students

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Mary Provident ◽  
Joyce Salls ◽  
Cathy Dolhi ◽  
Jodi , Schreiber ◽  
Amy Mattila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transformative Learning ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Online Program ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Online Curriculum ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
Curricular Design

Written reflections of 113 occupational therapy clinical doctoral students who graduated from an online program between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed for themes which reflected transformative learning and characteristics of curricular design which promoted transformative learning. Qualitative analyses of written reflections were performed. Several themes emerged which are presented using the framework of Person/Learner, Environment/Learning Context, and Occupation/Engagement in Learning Activities. Strategies such as active learning; assignments that directly apply to students’ work settings; implementation of a cohort model; and use of reflection, dialog, and project implementation appear to be effective in facilitating transformative learning in an online clinical doctoral program.

scholarly journals Design of an Online Curriculum Promoting Transformative Learning in Post Professional Doctoral Students

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Mary Provident ◽  
Joyce Salls ◽  
Cathy Dolhi ◽  
Jodi , Schreiber ◽  
Amy Mattila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transformative Learning ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Online Program ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Online Curriculum ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
Curricular Design

Written reflections of 113 occupational therapy clinical doctoral students who graduated from an online program between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed for themes which reflected transformative learning and characteristics of curricular design which promoted transformative learning. Qualitative analyses of written reflections were performed. Several themes emerged which are presented using the framework of Person/Learner, Environment/Learning Context, and Occupation/Engagement in Learning Activities. Strategies such as active learning; assignments that directly apply to students’ work settings; implementation of a cohort model; and use of reflection, dialog, and project implementation appear to be effective in facilitating transformative learning in an online clinical doctoral program.

scholarly journals Transforming doctoral education: preparing multidimensional and adaptive scholars

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-34
Author(s):  
Clinton A. Patterson ◽  
Chi-Ning Chang ◽  
Courtney N. Lavadia ◽  
Marta L. Pardo ◽  
Debra A. Fowler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transformative Learning ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Student ◽  
Pedagogical Practices ◽  
Career Adaptability ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Transferable Skills ◽  
Curricular Design

Purpose Concerning trends in graduate education, such as high attrition and underdeveloped skills, drive toward a new doctoral education approach. This paper aims to describe and propose a transformative doctoral education model (TDEM), incorporating elements that potentially address these challenges and expand the current practice. The model envisions discipline-specific knowledge coupled with a broader interdisciplinary perspective and addresses the transferable skills necessary to successfully navigate an ever-changing workforce and global landscape. The overarching goal of TDEM is to transform the doctoral student into a multi-dimensional and adaptive scholar, so the students of today can effectively and meaningfully solve the problems of tomorrow. Design/methodology/approach The foundation of TDEM is transformative learning theory, supporting the notion learner transformation occurs throughout the doctoral educational experience. Findings Current global doctoral education models and literature were reviewed. These findings informed the new TDEM. Practical implications Designed as a customizable framework for learner-centered doctoral education, TDEM promotes a mentor network on and off-campus, interdisciplinarity and agile career scope preparedness. Social implications Within the TDEM framework, doctoral students develop valuable knowledge and transferable skills. These developments increase doctoral student career adaptability and preparedness, as well as enables graduates to appropriately respond to global and societal complex problems. Originality/value This proposed doctoral education framework was formulated through a review of the literature and experiences with curricular design and pedagogical practices at a research-intensive university’s teaching and learning center. TDEM answers the call to develop frameworks that address issues in doctoral education and present a flexible and more personalized training. TDEM encourages doctoral student transformation into adaptive, forward-thinking scholars and thriving in an ever-changing workforce.

scholarly journals Reciprocal Peer Coaching an Instrumental Case Study of the Journey of a Three Year Doctoral Cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 208-215
Author(s):  
Carianne Bernadowski
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Peer Coaching ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Random Assignment ◽  
Building Relationships ◽  
Coaching Model ◽  
Instrumental Case Study ◽  
Doctoral Candidates

Reciprocal Peer coaching is a viable pedagogical strategy to use with doctoral students in order to encourage engagement, retention, collaboration, and engagement in a cohort model. This study explored a peer coaching model that randomly paired students in a three-year cohort doctoral program. Results indicated that doctoral candidates found that peer coaching and peer collaboration was beneficial both academically and personally. Moreover, candidates continued their relationship with their peers from year one to year three. Three themes emerged which included random assignment, building relationships through dialogue, and obstacles to success.

scholarly journals A Phenomenological Study of Attrition from a Doctoral Cohort Program: Changes in Feelings of Autonomy and Relatedness in the Dissertation Stage

10.28945/4158 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 517-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellie M. Burns ◽  
Catherine W Gillespie
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Education ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Doctoral Degree ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Post Secondary Education ◽  
Post Secondary ◽  
Cohort Programs ◽  
Program Changes

Aim/Purpose: This study examined why Ed.D students discontinued their doctoral programs during the dissertation phase as well as how a student’s needs of autonomy, relatedness, and competence were met during different stages of the program. Background: Time to complete the doctoral degree continues to increase. Between 40-60% of doctoral students are making the decision to discontinue work toward a degree they have already invested significant amounts of time, money, and energy into earning. Methodology: This phenomenological study utilized the lens of Self-Determination Theory. Seven participants (three women and four men) with between nine and sixteen years of post-secondary education, were interviewed three times each to gain a better understanding of the factors that impacted their attrition. Contribution: Past research has suggested using a cohort model to encourage retention of doctoral students. All seven participants were enrolled in cohort programs. This study incorporated suggestions from prior research such as a cohort model of learning and ensuring the students’ needs of autonomy, relatedness, and competence are met. The study investigates the experience of students in cohort programs who did not finish their dissertations. Findings: This study found that the doctoral students who did not complete their dissertations experienced changes in feelings of autonomy and relatedness between their coursework and their dissertations. This made it difficult for them to persist through the dissertation stage of the program. Changes in autonomy and relatedness, when coupled with changes in advisors, career, or family responsibilities resulted in students reprioritizing their goals and thus leaving the dissertation incomplete. Recommendations for Practitioners: Evaluate students’ autonomy needs as they progress through the program and attempt to pair students with advisors based on needs. Offer opportunities for students to gather and work on the dissertation after they finish the coursework stage of the program. Recommendation for Researchers: Understand the importance of advocating for one’s own needs as one moves through the doctoral program. Attempt to finish the dissertation as quickly as possible after the coursework stage of the doctoral program. Do not to allow the dissertation to move to the back burner. Impact on Society: Attrition at any level of post-secondary education is costly to both students and institutions. Doctoral students are often funding their own education while balancing careers and families. There is great potential financial impact on society if more students’ complete programs that they have already invested in heavily. Future Research: Examine the needs of autonomy in people who complete the doctoral program. Assess student needs and compare the results with advisor behaviors. Conduct a study with participants who have not earned a specialist degree. Conduct a study to determine the degree to which finances played a role in a students’ decision to discontinue working toward the doctoral degree. Study the impact of taking time off after completing the coursework and comprehensive exam stage of the program.

The Impact of a Cohort Model for Online Doctoral Student Retention and Success

2020 ◽  
pp. 113-139
Author(s):  
Debra Hoven ◽  
Rima Al Tawil ◽  
Kathryn Johnson ◽  
Nikki Pawlitschek ◽  
Dan Wilton
Keyword(s):  
Online Education ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Student Difficulties ◽  
Online Higher Education ◽  
Professional Doctorate ◽  
Doctoral Student Retention ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Warning Indicators

Two critical decisions were made in the design of Canada's first fully online doctoral program discussed in this chapter: to create a professional Doctorate in Education rather than a PhD and to enroll students as cohorts each year. The first decision was based on the contemporary need within the field of online higher education for discipline specialists to have a solid background in online education principles and practice. The second decision was made on the basis of literature around benefits for graduate students. However, little sustained research has been carried out on what specific benefits may accrue for doctoral students participating in a cohort-based program in an online environment. This chapter presents and discusses the outcomes of two research studies on a cohort model, to provide insights into some of the personal and other factors identified as early warning indicators of student difficulties and how and when they arise.

The Importance of Tough-Love Mentoring to Doctoral Student Success: Instruments to Measure the Doctoral Student/Proteges’ Perspective

10.28945/4630 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 485-516
Author(s):  
Laura Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Graduation Rates ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Doctoral Student ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
The United States ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Unique Contribution ◽  
Program Administrators ◽  
High Standards

Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine tough-love mentoring theory (TLM) as a potential way to address the problem of low graduation rates among doctoral students. Background: In order to address this purpose, the researcher presents the following: a) a validation study for assessment tools pertaining to TLM and b) a validation study of TLM theory and its two sub-theories: mentor integrity and trustworthiness sub-theory (MIT) and the mentor high standards sub-theory (MHS). Methodology: The researcher tested the validity of the mentor integrity and trustworthiness scale from the protégés’ perspective (MIT-P), the mentor high standards scale from the protégés’ perspective (MHS-P) and the protégés’ perceptions of their own independence (PPI) scale. The sample consisted of 31 doctoral protégés recruited with multi-phase sampling at four education-related doctoral programs in the eastern part of the United States. Contribution: The study provides evidence to support TLM as a strategy to address the problem of low graduation rates among doctoral students. In addition, the study contributes validation of assessment tools that can be used to measure doctoral protégés’ perceptions of their mentors. Findings: For each scale, the data show acceptable levels of internal consistency and evidence of content validity. The data are consistent with the TLM theory and its two sub-theories. The unique contribution of the current study is that it draws from the protégés’ perspective. Recommendations for Practitioners: The researcher presents a) strategies protégés can use to find trustworthy mentors with high standards and b) strategies program administrators can use for professional development of doctoral mentors. The researcher also provides the Right Angle Research Alignment (RARA) table to help protégés organize and manage the research methods section of their dissertation. Recommendation for Researchers: It is recommended that researchers use experimental methods to test TLM theory and the sub-theories, MIT and MHS. Impact on Society: This theory may be useful in business and in the arts and in other teaching relationships such as coaching and tutoring. The researcher encourages scholars to test TLM theory in these other contexts. Future Research: Further research questions that arise from this study are as follows: How can protégés find mentors who have high standards and who are trustworthy? What can doctoral program administrators do to help mentors develop high standards and trustworthiness?

Exploring business doctoral students attitudes, training, and use of classroom experiential learning activities

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 100493
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Bennett ◽  
Kevin D. Lo ◽  
Adam Pervez ◽  
Terry A. Nelson ◽  
Kenneth Mullane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Students Attitudes

Reading routines: strategies of recall in graduate education

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Alan Fine ◽  
Hannah Wohl ◽  
Simone Ispa-Landa
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Graduate Program ◽  
Graduate Training ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Note Taking ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Social

Purpose This study aims to explore how graduate students in the social sciences develop reading and note-taking routines. Design/methodology/approach Using a professional socialization framework drawing on grounded theory, this study draws on a snowball sample of 36 graduate students in the social sciences at US universities. Qualitative interviews were conducted to learn about graduate students’ reading and note-taking techniques. Findings This study uncovered how doctoral students experienced the shift from undergraduate to graduate training. Graduate school requires students to adopt new modes of reading and note-taking. However, students lacked explicit mentorship in these skills. Once they realized that the goal was to enter an academic conversation to produce knowledge, they developed new reading and note-taking routines by soliciting and implementing suggestions from advanced doctoral students and faculty mentors. Research limitations/implications The specific requirements of the individual graduate program shape students’ goals for reading and note-taking. Further examination of the relationship between graduate students’ reading and note-taking and institutional requirements is warranted with a larger sample of universities, including non-American institutions. Practical implications Graduate students benefit from explicit mentoring in reading and note-taking skills from doctoral faculty and advanced graduate students. Originality/value This study uncovers the perspectives of graduate students in the social sciences as they transition from undergraduate coursework in a doctoral program of study. This empirical, interview-based research highlights the centrality of reading and note-taking in doctoral studies.

La Clinica In LaK’ech: Establishing a Practicum Site Integrating Practice, Advocacy, and Research With Latinx Clients

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 987-1012
Author(s):  
Edward A. Delgado-Romero ◽  
Grace-Ellen Mahoney ◽  
Nancy J. Muro-Rodriguez ◽  
Ruben Atilano ◽  
Elizabeth Cárdenas Bautista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Mental Health Clinic ◽  
Southeast United States ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

This article concerns the establishment and development of La Clinica In LaK’ech, a bilingual mental health clinic collectively founded and staffed by a counseling psychologist and doctoral students in a counseling psychology doctoral program in the Southeast United States. During over 5 years of existence, the clinic has blended bilingual counseling psychology services, advocacy, interdisciplinary collaboration, and research with the Latinx population. The authors describe the development of the clinic and resultant clinical, training, and ethical issues that confronted the clinic in terms of providing services to a marginalized community in a state where anti-immigrant rhetoric, detention, and deportations were escalating. Also discussed are implications for training in practice, advocacy, service, and research for counseling psychologists working with Latinx communities.

Assessing the Performance of a Cohort-Based Model Using Domestic and International Practices

2016 ◽  
pp. 913-929
Author(s):  
Lou L. Sabina ◽  
Katherine A. Curry ◽  
Edward L. Harris ◽  
Bernita L. Krumm ◽  
Vallory Vencill
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Leadership Preparation ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
System 2 ◽  
Domestic Practices ◽  
Educational Leadership Preparation Programs ◽  
Educational Leadership Preparation

This chapter discusses the successes, strengths, and lessons learned during a five-year international Ed.D. program, which took place from 2007 to 2012 in Belize through a partnership with the Consortium for Belize Educational Cooperation. The objectives of the chapter are to (1) provide a brief history and explanation of the program including an overview of the Belize educational system, (2) explain how the program filled a need for both our institution and the country of Belize, (3) discuss the strengths and lessons learned in this cohort model for international educators, (4) offer a framework for other educational leadership preparation programs that might attempt international cohort-model doctoral programs, and (5) suggest implications for improving domestic practices through faculty and student participation in an international doctoral program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document