scholarly journals Russian legislation on public control

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 374-382
Author(s):  
Vitaly Viktorovich Goncharov ◽  
Tatiana N. Mikhaleva ◽  
Grigory A. Vasilevich ◽  
Evgeny Sergeevich Streltsov ◽  
Aleksandra Alekseevna Milkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Mechanism

This article is devoted to constitutional legal analysis of international legal bases of the legislation of the Russian Federation on public control. The work substantiates the position that to understand the constitutional legal mechanism of public control in Russia it is necessary to study the international legal framework of control of civil society over public authority in connection with the implementation of generally recognized principles and norms of international law in the legal system of the Russian Federation as a priority the rules of the legal regulation under Part 4 of Article 15 of the Constitution.

scholarly journals Constitutional and legal analysis of assessing the effectiveness off the formation and functioning of public control in Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 468-475
Author(s):  
Vitaly Viktorovich Goncharov
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Public Control ◽  
Legal Foundations ◽  
The Russian Federation

The practical implementation of the constitutional and legal foundations of public control in the Russian Federation involves the analysis of modern problems arising from the organization and implementation of this institution of civil society, as well as the development and justification of ways to resolve them.  We believe that the resolution of modern problems arising from the organization and implementation of public control in Russia will ensure the implementation in practice of the constitutional principles of democracy and the participation of citizens in the management of state affairs, as well as the implementation, protection and protection of the system of human rights and freedoms and citizen.  

scholarly journals The role of international bodies and organizations in the development of legal framework for application of video conferencing in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Mariia Aleksandrovna Iurkevich
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Video Conferencing ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
International Agreements ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Russian Federation

Legal regulation of the use of video technologies in the Russian criminal procedure is conducted on the international and domestic levels. However, based on the primacy of international law recognized by the Russian Federation, the marker is the position of international community that is reflected in the normative legal acts of its special bodies, as well as on the doctrinal level. This article carries out the chronological analysis of the acts issued by international bodies and organizations pertaining to the use video conferencing in criminal proceedings. The subject of this research is the acts of international bodies and organizations that underlie the development of the national legal framework for the use of video conferencing in the Russian Federation. The analysis of normative acts that regulate the use of video conferencing in the Russian criminal procedure demonstrate that for the most part this question is being addressed in the international agreements ratified by the Russian Federation, rather than in the national legislation (considering the provisions of the Part 3 of the Article 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). Leaning on the acquired results, the author concludes that such tendency can be explained by a number of circumstances, namely lag in the rates of digitalization compared to the leading European practices, insignificant period of approbation of the results of using video technologies, as well as relatively short period of intensive implementation of such technologies due to the amendments in criminal procedure policy of the country, which now requires exhaustive normative regulation. The author believes that it is more appropriate to begin the analysis of normative acts that determine the legal framework for application of video conferencing in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation with the general principles and norms of international law and international agreements, since their role in intensification of the process of digital transformation of criminal procedure in Russia cannot be overestimated.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of Public Control Institution: International and Foreign Experience

2019 ◽  
pp. 155-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Goncharov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Control ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Control Institution ◽  
Goals And Objectives

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the limits and the possibility of using international and foreign experience of its organization and functioning in optimizing the institution of public control in the Russian Federation. The author defines the concept of public control in the Russian Federation. The necessity of using international and foreign experience in the organization and functioning of the institution of public control in the process of optimizing this institution of civil society in Russia in the following areas is substantiated: 1) regarding the formulation of the concept of the institution of civil society control over public authority; 2) in terms of its consolidation in regulatory legal acts; 3) by definition of its basic principles, goals and objectives; 4)on consolidation of the list of objects in respect of which control is exercised; 5) on the development and implementation of the main forms and methods of this control; 6) to institutionalize the diversity of its subjects, as well as their authority. In this regard, a number of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Russian Federation regulating issues of public control are proposed. The author applies a number of methods of scientific research, in particular: historical, comparative legal, and formal logical analysis. This will not only solve modern problems that arise during the organization and functioning of public control in the Russian Federation, but also ensure its full development as a promising civil society institution. The paper proposes a number of changes and additions to the current legislation of Russia, regulating issues of public control. The results can be used both in educational and scientific, and in practical activities, including in lawmaking.

scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 96-102
Author(s):  
E.Y. Kovalenko ◽  
O.A. Shavandina
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Physical Culture ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Powerful Incentive

The article studies the national and international legal framework for regulating relations in thefield of physical culture and sports. It has been established that studying and taking into account positiveforeign experience in effectively regulating relations arising in the field of physical culture and sports, forimproving the norms of national sports law, including for codifying the sports legislation of Russia, is oneof the important reasons for the development of international cooperation of the Russian Federation withforeign countries. Another important reason is the need to harmonize and unify the national legislation ofRussia in the field of physical culture and sports with international law. The development of international cooperation between Russia and foreign countries and international organizations in the direction ofensuring national security is especially relevant in the context of exerting pressure on Russian athletes in thepast decade at sports competitions and events of various levels. It is concluded that Russia needs to developall areas of international cooperation, since physical culture and sport at the national and internationallevels is an important tool for ensuring the sustainable socio-economic development of countries, a tool forpersonal development of a person, a tool for intercultural, partnership and friendly development of interstatecommunication and serves as a powerful incentive to increase the competitiveness of each country in thecontext of globalization.

Doctrinal Approach to the Interrelation between National and International Law in the light of Constitutional Amendments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.O. Madaev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Dual Model ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Constitutional Amendments ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyzes the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-Federal Constitutional Laws «On Improving the Regulation of Certain Issues of the Public Power Organization and Functioning». The author carries out the theoretical and legal analysis of the Russian Federation Constitutional Court practice and the legislation adopted in view of this practice. It is noted that the amendments added to the Constitution of the Russian Federation reflect the official doctrine based on the recognition of the priority and supremacy of the Russian Federation Constitution in the legal system of the country. The author agrees that representatives of economically and militarily strong states have a significant influence on the development of international law, expressing the foreign policy doctrines of their states, while building a dual model of behavior: in relation to themselves – the priority of national law, in relation to other countries – the priority of international law. Under these conditions, the doctrine becomes a universal tool that connects the national and international legal spheres. It is necessary to recognize the ability of the doctrine to ensure the individualization, self-identification of the domestic legal system, the convergence of the Russian legal system and the systems of international public and private international law.

The Sanctions against the Russian Federation: International Legal Analysis of Legitimacy

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Мария Кешнер ◽  
Mariya Keshner
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Counter Measures ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Restrictive Measures

In 2014, a number of states and integration entities imposed sanctions and restrictive measures against the Russian Federation. The author analysis acts the measures adopted by the United States, the European Union, some other countries against the Russian Federation, from the point of view of the international law. The author investigates reasonableness of the arguments justifying the sanctions against the Russian Federation; and examines the issues of coercion in the international law, which has its specific features that are primarily predetermined by the nature of interstate relations and methods of their legal regulation. The author provides an update on the problem of “collective counter-measures” or counter-measures in collective interests and classification of activities of the third countries who “have joined” in with the imposed restrictive measures. The author considers the practice and consequences of imposing unilateral sanctions by a number of states, the trends of its development and legitimacy of the existence in light if the modern international law development.

scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES IN THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-304
Author(s):  
Inna D. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Services ◽  
The United States ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Provision Of Services ◽  
The Russian Federation

Having adopted the Constitution in 1993 and declared itself a social state, the Russian Federation assumed the duty not to exert power over its citizens, but to provide them with services. However, the provision of services has become a new, previously uncharacteristic area of activity of the state apparatus. Given this, the issue of creating a qualitatively new system of public administration in Russia was of particular relevance. Since the early 2000s. its decision is directly related to the «administrative reform», in which, among other things, the term «public service» was introduced into domestic legal circulation. Currently, the issue of improving the efficiency of public services is still on the agenda, because in the sphere of realization of citizens and organizations of their right to receive public services remains unresolved a number of problems, the main of which is the lack of a full legislative framework governing the institution of public services. The author, having carried out a comparative legal analysis of the administrative legislation of the Russian Federation with the legislation of the United States, which is considered more progressive in this area, attempts to identify the most significant advantages and disadvantages of the current domestic legal framework in the provision of public services. Taking into account the findings, the author formulates proposals aimed at improving the efficiency of management decisions in the provision of public services.

scholarly journals Improvement of Election Public Control Laws

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
T. N. Mikheeva ◽  
G. Sh. Shabalin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Control Laws ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Legal Mechanism

Civic control in the Russian Federation is gradually being introduced into many fields of activity of government authorities. At the same time, public control was tested in an area not covered by the legislation on public control-in the federal election campaign. We can talk about the emergence of a new electoral institute of civic observation that has been further implemented in the electoral process of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The paper analyzes the legislative rule allowing participation of public observers in the above-mentioned election campaigns, examines differences in the legal regulation exercised by different constituent entities. The study showed a minor role of the civic control in terms of municipal elections and the authority of the participants of civic control provided for in municipalities. Municipal civic chambers and public councils are deprived of the legal mechanism of direct participation in electoral observation. In this regard, the authors propose to improve the legislation in terms of expanding the powers of the participants of civic control of municipalities in the electoral field. The findings of the study are practical, as their implementation greatly increases civil society’s resource at the local level for providing public observation of elections.

Ensuring the Rights and Legal Interests of the Victim when Checking the Crime Report: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Criminal Procedure Codes of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China

2021 ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Irina G. Smirnova ◽  
◽  
Ekaterina V. Alekseeva ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Procedure Codes

The article presents a comparative legal analysis of the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedure Code of the People’s Republic of China, which regulate the rights and powers of the victim within the framework of the stage of initiating a criminal case. The authors highlight several significant differences in the legal regulation of this issue. The differences are: the obligation to comply with the rules of jurisdiction in China at the stage of filing a statement of a crime, which is not required under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation; compulsory fingerprinting of a person when filing a crime report with a public security agency implemented in China; the existence of several types of preliminary checks (the list of activities carried out as part of these checks in China is open); intensive development of IT technologies and their introduction into the life of society, including for the fight against crime and ensuring law and order in society, in China.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document