scholarly journals Are companies managed by overconfident CEO financially constraint? Investment-cash flow sensitivity approach

Equilibrium ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-131
Author(s):  
Elżbieta Bukalska
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Financial Decisions ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Financing Decisions ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Internal Funds ◽  
The Impact

Research background: Overconfidence is one of the biases and fallacies that affect a cognitive process. Indeed, overconfidence has some serious consequences even in corporate finance. The literature is not consistent as for the impact of overconfidence on investment and financing decisions. Additionally, we include the issue of financial constraints to our analysis as investment-cash flow sensitivity (ICFS) is perceived as the measure of financial constraints. Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to test investment-cash flow sensitivity and financial constraints under managerial overconfidence. We think that companies managed by overconfident managers show a higher relation between cash flows and investment and demonstrate bigger financial constraints. Methods: In this paper, we test investment-cash flow sensitivity and financial constraints under CEO overconfidence among panel data of Polish private firms. We collect the unique sample of 145 non-listed companies by surveying the CEOs on their overconfidence. We collect the financial data of surveyed companies covering the 2010–2016 period. Total number of observations is 1015. Findings & Value added: First, we find a positive and higher relation between the investment-cash flow sensitivity for companies managed by overconfident managers which is in line with recent research. As for the financial constraints we find lower level of financial constraints among the companies managed by overconfident man-agers. This might be evidence that despite having lower financial constraints the companies managed by overconfident managers intentionally choose internal funds as the main source of financing and refrain from using external funds. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first empirical study for Polish companies on the relation between CEO overconfidence and financial decisions.

scholarly journals Ownership Structure and Cash Flows As Determinants of Corporate Dividend Policy in Pakistan

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talat Afza ◽  
Hammad Hassan Mirza
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Operating Cash Flow ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Individual Ownership

Dividend Policy is among the widely addressed topics in modern financial literature. The inconclusiveness of the theories on importance of dividend in determining firm’s value has made it one of the most debatable topics for the researchers (see for example, Ramcharan, 2001; Frankfurter et. al 2002; Al-Malkawi, 2007). The present study investigates the impact of firm specific characteristics on corporate dividend behavior in emerging economy of Pakistan. Three years data (2005-2007) of 100 companies listed at Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) has been analyzed using Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression. The results show that managerial and individual ownership, cash flow sensitivity, size and leverage are negatively whereas, operating cash-flow and profitability are positively related to cash dividend. Managerial ownership, individual ownership, operating cash flow and size are the most significant determinants of dividend behavior whereas, leverage and cash flow sensitivity do not contribute significantly in determining the level of corporate dividend payment in the firms studied in our sample. Estimated results are robust to alternative proxy of dividend behavior i.e. dividend intensity.

Financial Development and the Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inder K. Khurana ◽  
Xiumin Martin ◽  
Raynolde Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Cash Holdings ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
External Financing ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity

AbstractPrior research posits that market imperfections and the lack of institutions that protect investor interests create a divergence between the cost of internal and external funds, thereby constraining firms' ability to fund investment projects through external financing. Financial constraints force firms to manage their cash flows to finance potentially profitable projects. A related stream of research documents that financial constraints due to costly external financing are more pronounced in underdeveloped financial markets. We examine the influence of financial development on the demand for liquidity by focusing on how financial development affects the sensitivity of firms' cash holdings to their cash flows. Using firm-level data for 35 countries covering about 12,782 firms for the years 1994–2002, we find the sensitivity of cash holdings to cash flows decreases with financial development. We also consider additional implications of firms' cash flow sensitivity of cash with respect to firm size and business cycles. Overall, we provide new cross-country evidence of the role of financial development on financial constraints.

The impact of cash holdings and external financing on investment-cash flow sensitivity

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Nyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Cash Holdings ◽  
External Financing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – This paper aims to propose several factors which can explain the negative relationship between financial constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivity. Design/methodology/approach – The author uses traditional fixed effects model and minimum distance panel estimation by Erickson and Whited (2000) to estimate investment-cash flow sensitivity in the cash flow-augmented investment equation. In addition, principal component analysis is used to construct a financial constraints measure. Findings – First, it was found that substitutability between cash holdings and free cash flow can partially explain why financially constrained firms do not depend on cash flow as heavily as we expect. Second, it was confirmed that the level of net external financing can also partially explain the investment-cash flow sensitivity puzzle. Furthermore, it was argued that the influence of cash holdings and external financing on investment-cash flow sensitivity is caused by the low level of internal cash flow for financially constrained firms. This argument is supported by our findings from an examination of investment-cash flow sensitivity for bank-dependent firms during the recession periods. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the literature by suggesting possible partial explanations for the contradictory relationship between investment-cash flow sensitivity and financial constraints.

scholarly journals The Impact of Board Size on Firm-Level Capital Investment Efficiency

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Amy E. Ji
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Investment Efficiency ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Internal Funds ◽  
The Impact

<p>The study aims to examine whether and how board structure is associated with firm-level capital investment efficiency. Specifically, I investigate whether the size of a firm’s board is associated with the sensitivity of investments to the availability of internal funds. I hypothesize and find that board size is inversely related to investment-cash flow sensitivity. Larger boards seem to mitigate investment-cash flow sensitivity by reducing information asymmetry between managers and external capital providers. The study is important as it reveals that board structure influences the corporate investment policy, which is one of the most important firm economic decisions.</p>

Unexpected investment, tunnelling and financial constraints

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Hong Ngoc Ha ◽  
An Thai
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Agency Problems ◽  
Free Cash Flow ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Managers ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Stock Market Investors ◽  
The Impact

PurposeBased on a sample of 1,435 Vietnamese listed firms over the period from 2005 to 2017, this study examines the sensitivity of unexpected investment to free cash flow and its mechanism.Design/methodology/approachWe tested three hypotheses using two-step system-GMM to investigate investment–cash flow sensitivity for various firm scenarios while accounting for confounding variables.FindingsFirms with negative free cash flow are more likely to engage in underinvestment; conversely, overinvestment is found primarily in firms with positive free cash flow. In terms of the mechanism, while underinvesting decisions are caused mainly by financial constraints, overinvesting behaviour primarily resulted from agency problems, typically in the form of principal-principal conflicts. Interestingly, under the impact of negative cash flow observations, financial constraints tend to decrease investment–cash flow sensitivity. Conversely, the agency costs hypothesis reveals that agency problems are more likely to increase investment–cash flow sensitivity.Originality/valueThese findings not only contribute to the current corporate literature but also provide some important practical implications for stock market investors, corporate managers, and policy-setting bodies, specifically in the Vietnamese market.

Debt holdings and investment cash flow sensitivity of listed firms

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnson Worlanyo Ahiadorme ◽  
Agyapomaa Gyeke-Dako ◽  
Joshua Yindenaba Abor
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Empirical Modeling ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivity ◽  
Cash Flow Sensitivities ◽  
Internal Funds

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of debt holdings on the sensitivity of firms’ investment to availability of internal funds. Design/methodology/approach For a panel data set of 27 Ghanaian listed firms for the period 2007–2013, the paper applies the Euler equation approach to the empirical modeling of investment. Findings The study finds support for the assertion that listed firms face less severe corporate control problems and lower financing constraints, and thus, have lower investment cash flow sensitivities. The study also finds that a significant positive sensitivity of investment to internal funds is associated with firms that have high debt holdings. Practical implications An implication of this study is that firms with high debt holdings face greater challenges in accessing external finance. These firms are likely to experience under-investment which at a macro level would translate into lower investments and economic growth for the country. Originality/value Empirical literature document that in the presence of market imperfections, investments of financially constrained firms become sensitive to the availability of internal finance. There are also contradictory evidences regarding the pattern of the observed investment cash flow sensitivity. This study examines the effect of debt holdings on the sensitivity of firms’ investment to availability of cash flow. This is yet to be empirically tested despite some theoretical explanations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document