Houses With Mezzanine in Residential Development of Cities of the Tyumen Region as Objects of Historical and Cultural Heritage (Second Half of XIX - Early XX Centuries)

Author(s):  
Maria Yuryevna Gaiduk ◽  
Aleksandr Ivanovich Klimenko ◽  
Oleg Sergeyevich Poroshin
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-55
Author(s):  
Larry Coben

Archaeological sites are disappearing at a rapidly accelerating rate. While destruction by ISIS and looting get all the press, the primary causes of cultural heritage loss are economic: commercial and residential development and encroachment, mining, energy, agriculture and looting to name a few. If the source of the problem is economic, so must the solutions be. In this talk, I discuss what types of economic solutions are most likely to succeed and which are destined to fail. I will describe why smaller scale projects incorporating women’s empowerment and sustainable community development actually work, and why large scale projects divorced from business reality rarely do. Successful programs allow communities to build their futures and save their pasts.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Arief Kurniawan ◽  
Chyntyaningtyas Meytasari

ABSTRACTYogyakarta City Government (Pemkot) and the surrounding Regency Government (Pemkab) get a lot of criticism from the public regarding policies that have resulted in massive vertical residential development in the form of hotels and apartments. In addition, the presence of vertical housing is also feared to have an impact on changes in community culture.This study aims to examine the extent to which local wisdom values are applied to star hotels and vertical occupancy in the Yogyakarta Cultural Heritage Area and what direction can be obtained so that star hotels and vertical housing are able to incorporate the value of local wisdom in YogyakartaThis research was conducted using the transforming tradition method. The main principles of the ATUMICS method are about regulation, combination, integration, or a mixture of basic elements of tradition with modernity.The results of the analysis found that the percentage of local wisdom in star hotels and vertical buildings in malioboro 8%, Kraton 15%, Puro Pakualaman 10%, Kotagede 30% and Kotabaru 5%. The average of all is 13.6%. This proves that the value of local wisdom in star hotels and vertical buildings is still low (below 50%). Most star hotels and vertical buildings have not adopted the type of architecture that suits their respective regions. The total stars and vertical buildings still display modern architecture and the present as the main architecture.Keywords: cultural heritage areas, star hotels, value of local wisdom, vertical residential


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Natalya A. KOSENKOVA ◽  
Alina A. SEROVA

The purpose of the article is to identify the infl uence of the system of priority identifi ers on the architecture of public objects in Samara in the historical stages, from the time of the foundation of the city (1586) to the present time. On the example of some heritage objects the diff erence between the architectural and historical environment and its uniqueness is shown. The conclusion is made that the preservation of the identity of the place is the most important principle of sustainable development of the architectural and historical environment, since the historical and cultural heritage must be transferred to the future. As a result, the image of the Samara residential development along the whole path of its development was determined, the types, styles, impacts of the external and internal ethnos, as well as the productive forces that are the basis for the development of the city in each historical period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document