Features of the of tort risk implementation in the system of compulsory insurance of civil liability of vehicle owners

Author(s):  
Maksim Yu. Dendiberya ◽  
Elena Yu. Lemeshko
InterConf ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Faik Birishik

Both Turkish and Azerbaijani legislation requires motor vehicle owners to enter into a contract of compulsory civil liability insurance. The list of vehicles with compulsory civil liability insurance to third parties is reflected in Article 50.2 of the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on “Compulsory Insurance”. A similar list of vehicles with compulsory civil liability insurance is reflected in the Law of the Republic of Turkey “On Motor Roads”. Losses included in the coverage area of the insurance contract on compulsory civil liability insurance of motor vehicle owners are classified in the form of damage to vehicles, material damage and damage to life and health of the victim.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 518-550
Author(s):  
Phani Dascalopoulou-Livada ◽  
Alexandros Kolliopoulos

Abstract Τhe Kiev Civil Liability Protocol creates a strict liability regime which channels liability towards the operator, providing also that such liability shall be covered by compulsory insurance. The Protocol implements the “polluter-pays” principle and, unlike other similar regimes, it is neither exclusive nor self-contained, allowing in some instances for the application of other international instruments or of relevant rules of domestic law. It is argued that the Kiev Protocol can coexist with eu Directive 2004/35 on environmental liability, given that the latter opts for an administrative approach, and could even provide a mechanism for the recovery of costs incurred by the competent public authority in case of transboundary damage, thus facilitating the implementation of the Directive. It covers both economic and, to an extent, environmental damage and, if in force, will be an important tool in the hands of the victims of transboundary pollution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yury Kolesnikov

The conditions of insurance of civil liability for causing damage as a result of an accident of a hydraulic structure, stipulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation on compulsory insurance of civil liability of the owner of a hazardous object, do not fully comply with the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the safety of hydraulic structures. For example, the size of insurance sums is established regardless of the amount of financial security of civil liability, which the owner of a hydraulic structure or operating organization must have (the construction is in state ownership). Some insurance companies are taking steps to develop their own rules for assessing the risk of accidents and the size of the harm caused. It does not take into account the fact that such industry-specific methods for determining the amount of probable harm to hydraulic structures for various purposes exist and are used for a long time. This article discusses the implementation of the compulsory insurance procedure in relation to navigable hydraulic structures, which refer to the objects of state ownership. The results of the author’s comparative analysis of certain provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the safety of hydraulic structures and compulsory insurance of civil liability of the owner of a hazardous object, as well as the data of operating organizations indicate the presence of a number of inconsistencies and the need for their settlement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Anna Augustynowicz ◽  
Iwona Wrześniewska-Wal ◽  
Dorota Cianciara

The article discusses the subject matter of the mandatory liability insurance of a medical diagnostic laboratory. The civil liability insurance contract covers all damages caused by the insured’s action or omission, which took place during the period of insurance cover resulting from the laboratory diagnostics or illegal discontinuation of their performance. Insurance cover does not cover damages resulting from violation of patient’s rights.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document