scholarly journals Isolated acute hemorrhagic cholecystitis in liver cirrhosis after blunt trauma

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Yoonjung Heo ◽  
Dong Hun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Monitoring Tool ◽  
Type Of Injury ◽  
Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis

Isolated acute hemorrhagic cholecystitis (AHC) after blunt trauma is extremely rare. Thus, alcoholic liver cirrhosis can be a risk factor for this type of injury. The use of point-of-care ultrasound as a monitoring tool for suspicious gallbladder injuries facilitates rapid recognition and decision-making. Therefore, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was recommended for treating traumatic AHC in patients with hemodynamically stable liver cirrhosis.

Point of Care Ultrasound in Geriatric Patients: Prospective Evaluation of a Portable Handheld Ultrasound Device

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
pp. 308-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eckhart Fröhlich ◽  
Katharina Beller ◽  
Reinhold Muller ◽  
Maria Herrmann ◽  
Ines Debove ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Handheld Device ◽  
Ultrasound Device ◽  
Handheld Ultrasound

Abstract Purpose The aim of the current study was to evaluate point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in geriatric patients by echoscopy using a handheld ultrasound device (HHUSD, VScan) at bedside in comparison to a high-end ultrasound system (HEUS) as the gold standard. Materials and Methods Prospective observational study with a total of 112 geriatric patients. The ultrasound examinations were independently performed by two experienced blinded examiners with a portable handheld device and a high-end ultrasound device. The findings were compared with respect to diagnostic findings and therapeutic implications. Results The main indications for the ultrasound examinations were dyspnea (44.6 %), fall (frailty) (24.1 %) and fever (21.4 %). The most frequently found diagnoses were cystic lesions 32.1 % (35/109), hepatic vein congestion 19.3 % (21/109) and ascites 13.6 % (15/110). HHUSD delivered 13 false-negative findings in the abdomen resulting in an “overall sensitivity” of 89.5 %. The respective “overall specificity” was 99.6 % (7 false-positive diagnoses). HHUSD (versus HEUS data) resulted in 13.6 % (17.3 %) diagnostically relevant procedures in the abdomen and 0.9 % (0.9 %) in the thorax. Without HHUSD (HEUS) 95.7 % (100 %) of important pathological findings would have been missed. Conclusion The small HHUSD tool improves clinical decision-making in immobile geriatric patients at the point of care (geriatric ward). In most cases, HHUSD allows sufficiently accurate yes/no diagnoses already at the bedside, thereby clarifying the leading symptoms for early clinical decision-making.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) training course for Regional Anesthesiologists – A Single Institution’s Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Alex K. Saltzman ◽  
Thuyvan H. Luu ◽  
Nicole Brunetti ◽  
James D. Beckman ◽  
Mary J. Hargett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
P Value ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Training Course ◽  
The Impact

Background and Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the form of focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) is a powerful clinical tool for anesthesiologists to supplement bedside evaluation and optimize cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the perioperative setting. However, few courses are available to train physicians. At Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), from March of 2013 to May of 2016, nine basic Focused Assessed Transthoracic Echocardiography (FATE) training courses were held. A large percentage of the participants were practicing regional anesthesiologists or trainees in fellowship for regional anesthesia and acute pain. In this study, a survey was used to assess clinical utilization as well as potential barriers to use for regional anesthesiologists. Methods: Following IRB approval, 183 past participants of the basic FATE training course were contacted weekly from November 22nd, 2016, through January 3rd, 2017, via email and sent a maximum 40-item electronic survey hosted on REDCap. Responses were analyzed by a blinded statistician. Results: 92 participants responded (50%), and 65 of the 92 (70.7%) indicated they had regional anesthesiology training or practice regional anesthesia regularly. Of the total number of respondents, 50% (95% CI: 40.3%, 59.8%; P-value = 0.001) have used FOCUS to guide clinical decision making. Of the regional anesthesiologists, 27 (45.8%) have used FOCUS to guide clinical decision making with left ventricular function assessment (40.7%) and hypovolemia (39.0%) being the most common reasons. Regional anesthesiologists utilized FOCUS in the following settings: preoperatively (44.6%), intraoperatively (41.5%), postoperatively (41.5%), and in the Intensive Care Unit (40.0%). Limitations were due to lack of opportunities (52.3%), resources (36.9%), and comfort with performance (30.8%). 84.4% agreed that basic FOCUS training should be a required part of anesthesia residents or fellows’ curriculum. Conclusions: This study is the first formal evaluation of the impact of the implementation of a FOCUS training course on regional anesthesiologists’ current practice. Nearly 50% of regional anesthesiologists used FOCUS to guide clinical decision-making following formal training. The limitations to the use of FOCUS were a lack of relevant opportunities and resources. This evaluation of clinical use following training provides insight into how FOCUS is used by regional anesthesiologists and the limitations to implementation in the perioperative setting.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use, Accuracy, and Impact on Clinical Decision Making in Rwanda Hospitals

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia C. Henwood ◽  
David C. Mackenzie ◽  
Andrew S. Liteplo ◽  
Joshua S. Rempell ◽  
Alice F. Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Hepatitis C virus infection as a risk factor for non-alcoholic liver cirrhosis in taiwan

1993 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Fa Tsai ◽  
Wen-Yu Chang ◽  
Jen-Eing Jeng ◽  
Mei-Shang Ho ◽  
Liang-Yen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Virus Infection ◽  
Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Education and simulation in point-of-care ultrasound

2019 ◽  
pp. 203-215
Author(s):  
Paul Olszynski ◽  
Melanie Stander ◽  
Tim Harris ◽  
Mark Tutschka ◽  
Paul Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Clinical Integration ◽  
Educational Methods ◽  
The Common

This chapter deals with some of the common questions surrounding training in point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)—how does a clinician achieve competence in PoCUS? What educational methods are the most appropriate for PoCUS? What applications should be taught? How can advanced skills be learnt? How can quality be assured and improved? How can low- and high-fidelity simulation help with skills training and maintenance and confidence building, as well as clinical integration and decision-making? Technology is evolving, advancing, and adapting to training needs. While there may be no universally accepted curriculum for training and assessment, a consensus is forming around core theories and practices.

scholarly journals Taking the Pulse of POCUS: The State of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital

POCUS Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-87
Author(s):  
Peter Gutierrez ◽  
Tal Berkowitz ◽  
Lekha Shah ◽  
Stephanie G. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Future Practice

We aim to quantify and categorize point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) usage by pediatric practitioners and trainees at our tertiary care center, and assess the degree of interest from pediatric residents, fellows, and program leaders for integrating POCUS into their training. Data was collected via online survey, evaluating the current use of POCUS in clinical decision making, desire for further formal training, and opinions on the importance of POCUS to future clinical practice. In total, 14 program directors/assistant program directors (PD/APDs) representing 10 of 15 training programs, 30 of 95 fellows representing 9 of 15 fellowships, and 32 of 82 residents responded. From PD/APDs, only 2 of the programs reported active use POCUS for clinical decision making, but 13 of the fellows and 9 residents reported doing so. In regard to desire for a formal POCUS program, 30.8% of PD/APDs, 43.8% of fellows without current curricula, and 87.5% of residents were interested in participating in such a program. When considering specialty, some non-acute care-based PD/APDs and fellows at our institution felt that POCUS was important to future practice. Pediatric subspecialty PD/APDs and their fellows had divergent outlooks on the importance of POCUS in future practice. Finally, an overwhelming majority of residents at our institution expressed a desire to learn, and half believing it will be important to future practice. Based on the degree of interest, medicolegal considerations, and trajectory of patient care, pediatric residency and fellowship programs should strongly consider integrating POCUS education into their curricula.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document