scholarly journals Improving productivity through corporate hackathons: A multiple case study of two large-scale agile organizations

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Brede Moe ◽  
Rasmus Ulfsnes ◽  
Viktoria Stray ◽  
Darja Smite
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Agile Organizations

scholarly journals The Implementation of National Dementia Plans: A Multiple-Case Study on Denmark, Germany and Italy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 10220
Author(s):  
Nadia Boeree ◽  
Claudia Zoller ◽  
Robbert Huijsman
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
World Health ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Communication Plan ◽  
National Public Health ◽  
Multiple Case

In a theory-driven, qualitative, multiple-case study, we examined the implementation of national dementia plans (NDPs) in Denmark, Germany, and Italy to determine how stakeholders involved in implementing the NDPs evaluate contextual factors in light of the World Health Organization’s seven action areas of dementia-focused policy. To analyse the NDPs, we used a driver diagram of large-scale change and conducted both document analysis and semi-structured interviews, after which we performed three-way open coding to analyse the methods. The results show that the implementation of NDPs has increased awareness of dementia in all three countries by positioning the disease as a national public health concern. The study also reveals that resources, the use of change theory, and the monitoring of implementation and fragmentation are crucial factors to consider for countries when implementing NDPs. Although stakeholders find the NDPs useful, many challenges remain for their successful implementation due to the highly limited means for implementation and evaluation. Moreover, present NDPs all lack a communication plan that encompasses all layers of society to address ways of achieving change. Patients with dementia, and their informal caregivers, should be included more in the design, implementation, and evaluation of NDPs in order to improve their usefulness and effectiveness.

Implementation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Community-Based Interventions for Cardiovascular Health Through a National Not-for-Profit: A Multiple Case Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney R. Garney ◽  
Leigh E. Szucs ◽  
Kristin Primm ◽  
Laura King Hahn ◽  
Kristen M. Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Community Based Interventions ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Policy Systems

Introduction. In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the American Heart Association to implement policy, systems, and environment-focused strategies targeting access to healthy food and beverages, physical activity, and smoke-free environments. Method. To understand factors affecting implementation and variations in success across sites, evaluators conducted a multiple case study. Based on past literature, community sites were categorized as capacity-building or implementation-ready, for comparison. A sample of six communities were selected using a systematic selection tool. Through site visits, evaluators conducted interviews with program staff and community partners and assessed action plans. Results. Evaluators identified important implications for nationally coordinated community-based prevention programming. Differences in implementation varied by the communities’ readiness, with the most notable differences in how they planned activities and defined success. Existing partner relationships (or lack thereof) played a significant role, regardless of the American Heart Association’s existing presence within the communities, in the progression of initiatives and the differences observed among phases. Last, goals in capacity-building sites were tied to organizational goals while goals in implementation-ready sites were more incremental with increased community influence and buy-in. Discussion. Using national organizations as a mechanism to carry out large-scale community-based prevention work is a viable option that provides coordinated, wide-scale implementation without sacrificing a community’s priorities or input. In funding future initiatives, the presence of relationships and the time needed to cultivate such relationships should be accounted for in the planning and implementation processes, as well as both local and national expectations.

scholarly journals Going for Broke: A Multiple-Case Study of Brokerage in Education

AERA Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 233285841876929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel R. Malin ◽  
Chris Brown ◽  
Angela St Trubceac
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
Core Knowledge ◽  
Knowledge Mobilization ◽  
Usable Knowledge ◽  
Multiple Data ◽  
Multiple Case ◽  
Use Of Social Media

Although the central role of educational intermediaries that can connect research and practice is increasingly appreciated, our present understanding of their motivations, products, and processes is inadequate. In response, this multiple-case study asks how and why three large-scale intermediaries—Edutopia, the Marshall Memo, and Usable Knowledge—are engaging in brokerage activities, and compares the features of the knowledge they seek to share and mobilize. These entities were deliberately chosen and anticipated to reveal diversity. Multiple data sources were analyzed based primarily upon Ward’s knowledge mobilization framework. These entities contrasted widely, especially in relation to core knowledge dimensions, enabling us to identify two distinct brokerage types. To conclude, theoretical (how to conceptualize brokerage) and practical (how to foster interactive knowledge exchange) implications are presented. This study also reveals certain innovative mobilization approaches, including skillful use of social media and the production of videos depicting how and why to adopt particular strategies.

Die Problematik der Implementierung von Kinästhetik in Einrichtungen der stationären Langzeitpflege – Eine Multiple Case-Study

Pflege ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Carola Maurer ◽  
Heidrun Gattinger ◽  
Hanna Mayer
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Case Study ◽  
Multiple Case

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Einrichtungen der stationären Langzeitpflege investieren seit Jahren Ressourcen in die Entwicklung der Kinästhetikkompetenz der Pflegenden. Aus aktuellen Studien geht hervor, dass die Implementierung, bzw. die nachhaltige Förderung der Kinästhetikkompetenz problematisch ist, vertiefte Erkenntnisse zu den Ursachen fehlen jedoch. Fragestellung: Welche Hemmnisse verhindern eine nachhaltige Implementierung von Kinästhetik in Einrichtungen der stationären Langzeitpflege? Methode: Es wurde eine Multiple Case-Study in drei Einrichtungen der deutschsprachigen Schweiz durchgeführt. Aus leitfadengestützten Interviews und (fallbezogener) Literatur zum externen Kontext wurden in den Within-Case-Analysen die Daten induktiv verdichtet und diese Ergebnisse in der Cross-Case-Synthese miteinander verglichen und abstrahierend zusammengeführt. Ergebnisse: Die Synthese zeigt, dass die Implementierung von Kinästhetik innerhalb der Einrichtung auf drei verschiedenen Ebenen – der Leitungs-, Pflegeteam- und Pflegeperson-Ebene – als auch durch externe Faktoren negativ beeinflusst werden kann. Schlussfolgerungen: In der Pflegepraxis und -wissenschaft sowie im Gesundheitswesen benötigt es ein grundlegendes Verständnis von Kinästhetik und wie dieses im Kontext des professionellen Pflegehandelns einzuordnen ist. Insbesondere Leitungs- und implementierungsverantwortliche Personen müssen mögliche Hemmnisse kennen, um entsprechende Strategien entwickeln zu können.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document