scholarly journals The Implementation of Supreme Court Regulations Number 1/2016 Concerning The Procedure of In-Court Mediation on Economy Sharia Dispute (A Case Study in Blitar Religious Court)

Khatulistiwa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-42
Author(s):  
Kutbuddin Aibak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Court Mediation

The sharia economic dispute resolution process in Indonesia has two paths which can be taken by litigants, namely litigation in court and non-litigation. This research was motivated by sharia economic dispute cases handled by Blitar Religious Court which were carried out through a mediation but failed. The failure of this mediation process and the factors behind the failure are important issues to be studied. Consequently, Supreme Court Regulation No. 1/2016 becomes important to be used as the basis of analysis, whether this regulation has been implemented or not. Therefore, this study aims to describe and analyze the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1/2016 concerning the procedure of in-court mediation on economy sharia disputes in Blitar Religious Court, along with various obstacles and solutions.

scholarly journals Sen, justice and the private realm of dispute resolution

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-373
Author(s):  
Debbie De Girolamo
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Private Realm ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Popular Justice ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
Ethnographic Data

AbstractThe attainment of justice through a private dispute-resolution process, such as the mediation process, is an elusive objective. With the prominent place mediation has been given in civil justice, debates about the ability of mediation to deliver substantive justice are relevant, particularly when proponents of the process argue that mediation offers some form of justice to its participants, while critics argue that it provides no justice. This paper explores the issue of justice in the private dispute-resolution process of mediation and its ability to deliver a substantive form of justice (rather than procedural or popular justice, which is often seen as the type of justice, if any, that is provided by mediation). It does so through an analysis of ethnographic data of the mediation process using Amartya Sen's justice framework set out inThe Idea of Justice.

scholarly journals The Adjudication of Marriage Disputes through Mediation at the Manado Religious Court

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Faradila Hasan ◽  
Nasruddin Yusuf ◽  
Moh. Muzwir R. Luntajo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Divorce Rate ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Marital Disputes

Abstract: The phenomenon of marital disputes that often end in divorce has been a serious concern of the government, resulting in a regulation on mediation, namely the Regulation of the Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 1 of 2016. This regulation was made with the hope of reducing the divorce rate caused by marriage disputes. This article discusses the form of marriage dispute resolution at Manado Religious Court with a focus on one type of dispute resolution, namely mediation. This study uses an empirical juridical approach. The research was conducted at the Manado City Religious Court in 2017 and 2020. The result is that the mediation process has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of PERMA No.1 of 2016. However, there have been many obstacles. Thus, the efforts to reduce the divorce rate due to marriage disputes have not undergone significant changes. Keywords: mediation; marriage dispute; Manado religious court. Abstrak: Fenomena sengketa perkawinan yang sering berakhir pada perceraian menjadi perhatian serius dari pemerintah sehingga melahirkan aturan tentang mediasi yaitu Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI (PERMA) No. 1 Tahun 2016. Aturan ini dibuat dengan harapan menekan angka perceraian yang diakibatkan oleh sengketa perkawinan. Artikel ini membahas mengenai bentuk penyelesaian sengketa perkawinan di Pengadilan Agama Manado dengan fokus pada salah satu jenis penyelesaian sengketa yaitu mediasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Pengadilan Agama Kota Manado pada tahun 2017 dan tahun 2020. Hasilnya adalah proses mediasi sudah dilakukan sesuai dengan ketentuan PERMA No.1 Tahun 2016. Namun mengalami benyak kendala sehingga upaya untuk menekan angka perceraian akibat sengketa perkawinan belum mengalami perubahan yang signifikan. Kata-kata kunci: mediasi; sengketa perkawinan; pengadilan agama Manado.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of The Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 on Divorce Settlement

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
Marzuki Marzuki ◽  
Abidin Abidin ◽  
Hilal Malarangan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Relevant Research ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Class Ib

The focus of this research is the effectiveness of implementing Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Mediation Process in the Court in the settlement of divorce cases at the Donggala’s Religious Court Class IB. The aim is to determine the implementation and effectiveness as well as the supporting and inhibiting factors for the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 in the settlement of divorce cases. This research is a qualitative with a case study. The data were collected through observations, interviews, and documentation to the parties in the relevant research locations. The results of this study indicate that the Donggala Religious Court Class IB has implemented the practice of implementing mediation in accordance with the provisions of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016. However, the results of its implementation show that its effectiveness is still very small; this is evidenced by the high number of divorces each year. From the data on the number of divorces, it shows that divorce tends to increase which is dominated by divorce due to continuous disputes.

scholarly journals Procedures for Completing Small Claims Lawsuit of Civil Cases in District Court in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Marjo ◽  
Nanik Rofikoh
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

The development of legal relations in the economic and other civil sectors in community highly requires a faster and less costly dispute resolution process, especially in small civil disputes. In connection with this matter, Indonesian Supreme Court issued various Supreme Court regulations, including Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Small Claims. The issuance of this regulation was to resolve special civil disputes regarding the acts against the law. In a small claim court lawsuit, it is required that the plaintiff and defendant be in the same jurisdiction. The value of the material suit in a small claim lawsuit is at most IDR 200 million or equal to 13,811 USD. Furthermore, for a small claim examination and verification of a lawsuit, it is carried out in a small manner, where the period of completion is determined a maximum of 25 days from the first trial day to the decision.  

scholarly journals Implementation of the Small Claims Court in Dispute Case Settlement in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seno Adhi Wibowo ◽  
Massulthan Rafi Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Review Procedure ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
Small Claims Court

Dispute settlement through the courts (litigation) is perceived as ineffective and costly. The dispute resolution process through the courts is prolonged and time-consuming due to its very formal and very technical review procedure, high costs of the case, and the likelihood of repeated trials. The number of complaints made against citizens unwilling to deal with the judiciary. The Supreme Court with its authority to address the problems of the courts (litigation), namely by ratifying the 2015 Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 concerning the procedures for the settlement of the Small Claims Court, to allow all elements of society to take a new direction of litigation, namely through Small Claims Court a simple, fast and low-cost lawsuit. With this, it hopes that the judicial process in Indonesia will be well underway in the future.

scholarly journals Deservingness in Judicial Discourse. An Analysis of the Legal Reasoning Adopted in Dutch Case Law on Irregular Migrant Families’ Access to Shelter

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Lieneke Slingenberg
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Migrant Families ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Discourse ◽  
Major Shift ◽  
New Interpretation ◽  
Irregular Migrant ◽  
Court Of Appeal

In September 2012, the Dutch Supreme Court upheld a judgment of the Hague Court of Appeal that the eviction from basic shelter of a mother and her minor children, who did not have legal residence in the Netherlands, was unlawful. This ruling was instigated by a radically new interpretation of the European Social Charter’s personal scope and caused a major shift in Dutch policy. This article provides a case study into the legal reasoning adopted by the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. It argues that, instead of relying on legal doctrinal reasoning for justifying the outcome, both courts referred to factors that the general public relies on to assess people’s deservingness of welfare. This finding raises fundamental questions about the relationship between human rights law and deservingness; and calls, therefore, for further research into the relevance of deservingness criteria in judicial discourse.

scholarly journals Mekanisme Majelis Tahkim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Rumah Tangga (Analisis Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 tentang Penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Muslem Muslem ◽  
Siti Aminah Binti Abd Samat
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Assembly Process ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Islamic Family Law ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Husband And Wife

Majelis Tahkim sebagai proses penyelesaian sengketa (syiqāq) yang melibatkan pertemuan suami dan isteri bersama dengan Hakam untuk tujuan perdamaian atau perceraian dengan lafaz talak atau dengan khuluk. Berdasarkan fakta empiris menyatakan bahwa salah satu provinsi yang paling menonjol menggunakan metode Majelis Tahkim ini adalah Provinsi Selangor. Sebagaimana yang diketahui oleh penulis bahwa praktek Majelis Tahkim di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam menggunakan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam yang diterapkan khusus di Provinsi Selangor sahaja yang berbeda dengan provinsi yang lain di Malaysia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan gambaran bagaimana praktek Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 mengenai penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam (Negeri Selangor) terhadap pelaksanaan Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga (syiqāq) di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam. Penulisan skripsi ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana mekanisme Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga dan keunggulan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam yang digunakan. Oleh itu, penulisan ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis. Dari hasil penelitian penulis dapat disimpulkan bahwa mekanisme Majelis Tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa rumah tangga di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam menggunakan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam terdapat beberapa keunggulan antaranya menjelaskan tentang Hakam dan proses Majelis Tahkim secara rinci sebagai panduan Hakam. Seterusnya, proses Majelis Tahkim ini mampu mengurangi beban Mahkamah Syariah dalam menyelesaikan kasus yang banyak di meja Mahkamah. Oleh hal yang demikian, diharapkan bagi pihak kerajaan perundangan untuk memberlakukan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam ini bagi semua provinsi di Malaysia agar Hakam mendapatkan panduan lebih mendalam terkait Hakam dan proses Majelis Tahkim. Tahkim Assembly as a dispute resolution process (SYIQĀQ) involving a husband and wife meeting along with Hakam for peace or divorce with the pronunciation of Talak or with Khuluk. According to empirical facts, it states that one of the most prominent provinces using the method of the Tahkim assembly is Selangor province. As it is known by the authors that the practice of the Tahkim assembly in Shah Alam Sharia court used the essential methods applied in the province of Selangor only different from other provinces in Malaysia. This study aims to obtain an overview of the enactment of Islamic Family Law number 2 the year 2003 section 48 on the addition of the Hakam methods (Selangor State) on the implementation of the Tahkim assembly in the settlement of household disputes (SYIQĀQ) in the Syariah low court of Shah Alam. The writing of this thesis is aimed at knowing how the Tahkim assembly mechanisms in the settlement of household disputes and the excellence of the Hakam methods used. Thus, this writer uses a descriptive method of analysis. From the results of the author's research can be concluded that the mechanism of the Tahkim assembly in the settlement of household disputes in Shah Alam Syariah low court using the essential methods there are several advantages between explaining Hakam and the process of Tahkim assembly in detail as a guide to Hakam. Subsequently, the Tahkim assembly process was able to reduce the burden of sharia Court in resolving many cases at the Court table. Therefore, it is expected for the legal government to enforce this Hakam method for all provinces in Malaysia for Hakam to obtain a more in-depth guide to the Hakam and the process of the Tahkim assembly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document