scholarly journals THE MAYER VIETORIS SEQUENCE CALCULATING DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 6516-6521
Author(s):  
Arben Baushi

De Rham cohomology it is very obvious that it relies heavily on both topology as well as analysis. We can say it creates a natural bridge between the two. To understand and be able to explain what exactly de Rham cohomology is to the world of mathematics we need to know de Rham groups. This is the reasons to calculate the de Rham cohomology of a manifold. This is usually quite difficult to do directly. We work with manifold. Manifold is a generalization of curves and surfaces to arbitrary dimension. A topological space M is called a manifold of dimension k if : · M is a topological Hausdorff space . · M has a countable topological base. · For all m∈M there is an open neighborhood U⊂M such that U is homeomorphic to an open subset V of ℝk. There are many different kinds of manifolds like topological manifolds, ℂk - manifolds, analytic manifolds, and complex manifolds, we concerned in smooth manifolds. A smooth manifold can described as a topological space that is locally like the Euclidian space of a dimension known. An important definion is homeomorphism. Let X, Y be topological spaces, and let f: X⟶Y e a bijection. If both f and the inverse function f−1: X⟶Y are continuous, then f is called a homeomorphism We introduce one of the useful tools for this calculating, the Mayer – Vietoris sequence. Another tool is the homotopy axiom. In this material I try to explain the Mayer – Vietoris sequence and give same examples. A short exact sequence of cochain complexes gives rise to a long exact sequence in cohomology, called the Mayer - Vietories sequence. Cohomology of the circle (S^1), cohomology of the spheres (S^2). Homeomorphism between vector spaces and an open cover of a manifold. we define de Rham cohomology and compute a few examples.

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Meyer ◽  
Ryszard Nest

AbstractWe define the filtrated K-theory of a C*-algebra over a finite topological spaceXand explain how to construct a spectral sequence that computes the bivariant Kasparov theory overXin terms of filtrated K-theory.For finite spaces with a totally ordered lattice of open subsets, this spectral sequence becomes an exact sequence as in the Universal Coefficient Theorem, with the same consequences for classification. We also exhibit an example where filtrated K-theory is not yet a complete invariant. We describe two C*-algebras over a spaceXwith four points that have isomorphic filtrated K-theory without being KK(X)-equivalent. For this spaceX, we enrich filtrated K-theory by another K-theory functor to a complete invariant up to KK(X)-equivalence that satisfies a Universal Coefficient Theorem.


1995 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. I. Lehrer

For any topological space X and integer n ≥ 1, denote by Cn(X) the configuration spaceThe symmetric group Sn acts by permuting coordinates on Cn(X) and we are concerned in this note with the induced graded representation of Sn on the cohomology space H*(Cn(X)) = ⊕iHi (Cn(X), ℂ), where Hi denotes (singular or de Rham) cohomology. When X = ℂ, Cn(X) is a K(π, 1) space, where π is the n-string pure braid group (cf. [3]). The corresponding representation of Sn in this case was determined in [5], using the fact that Cn(C) is a hyperplane complement and a presentation of its cohomology ring appears in [1] and in a more general setting, in [8] (see also [2]).


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (05) ◽  
pp. 1850067
Author(s):  
Peter Scheiblechner

Grothendieck has proved that each class in the de Rham cohomology of a smooth complex affine variety can be represented by a differential form with polynomial coefficients. We prove a single exponential bound on the degrees of these polynomials for varieties of arbitrary dimension. More precisely, we show that the [Formula: see text]th de Rham cohomology of a smooth affine variety of dimension [Formula: see text] and degree [Formula: see text] can be represented by differential forms of degree [Formula: see text]. This result is relevant for the algorithmic computation of the cohomology, but is also motivated by questions in the theory of ordinary differential equations related to the infinitesimal Hilbert 16th problem.


1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiesław Sasin

Author(s):  
Federico Scavia

Abstract Building upon work of Epstein, May and Drury, we define and investigate the mod p Steenrod operations on the de Rham cohomology of smooth algebraic stacks over a field of characteristic $p>0$ . We then compute the action of the operations on the de Rham cohomology of classifying stacks for finite groups, connected reductive groups for which p is not a torsion prime and (special) orthogonal groups when $p=2$ .


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Fritz

Abstract In this short note, we prove that the stochastic order of Radon probability measures on any ordered topological space is antisymmetric. This has been known before in various special cases. We give a simple and elementary proof of the general result.


Author(s):  
B. J. Day ◽  
G. M. Kelly

We are concerned with the category of topological spaces and continuous maps. A surjection f: X → Y in this category is called a quotient map if G is open in Y whenever f−1G is open in X. Our purpose is to answer the following three questions:Question 1. For which continuous surjections f: X → Y is every pullback of f a quotient map?Question 2. For which continuous surjections f: X → Y is f × lz: X × Z → Y × Z a quotient map for every topological space Z? (These include all those f answering to Question 1, since f × lz is the pullback of f by the projection map Y ×Z → Y.)Question 3. For which topological spaces Z is f × 1Z: X × Z → Y × Z a qiptoent map for every quotient map f?


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Amit Kumar Singh ◽  
Rekha Srivastava

In this paper we have studied separation axiomsTi,i=0,1,2in an intuitionistic fuzzy topological space introduced by Coker. We also show the existence of functorsℬ:IF-Top→BF-Topand𝒟:BF-Top→IF-Topand observe that𝒟is left adjoint toℬ.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipankar Dey ◽  
Dhananjay Mandal ◽  
Manabendra Nath Mukherjee

PurposeThe present article deals with the initiation and study of a uniformity like notion, captioned μ-uniformity, in the context of a generalized topological space.Design/methodology/approachThe existence of uniformity for a completely regular topological space is well-known, and the interrelation of this structure with a proximity is also well-studied. Using this idea, a structure on generalized topological space has been developed, to establish the same type of compatibility in the corresponding frameworks.FindingsIt is proved, among other things, that a μ-uniformity on a non-empty set X always induces a generalized topology on X, which is μ-completely regular too. In the last theorem of the paper, the authors develop a relation between μ-proximity and μ-uniformity by showing that every μ-uniformity generates a μ-proximity, both giving the same generalized topology on the underlying set.Originality/valueIt is an original work influenced by the previous works that have been done on generalized topological spaces. A kind of generalization has been done in this article, that has produced an intermediate structure to the already known generalized topological spaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document