A Study on the Self-determination and Motivation Perceived by the People with Mental Disability and the Mental Health Professionals - Focusing on Self-determination Theory

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-118
Author(s):  
Byung-Sun Park ◽  
Sung-Woo Bae
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Kris Gledhill

<p align="LEFT">The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for detention and also for treatment which would otherwise be an assault. As such, it allows for interference with the fundamental rights to liberty and to self-determination. Particularly as it does so in the context of a branch of medicine which is often highly subjective, it is hardly surprising that litigation is occasionally resorted to by those affected who wish to challenge the legality of what is occurring to them.</p><p align="LEFT">The framework for this litigation has developed, spurred on in particular by the growth of public law and human rights law. As a result, mental health professionals have to be familiar not just with the court-machinery which is central to the Mental Health Act 1983 (which provides for the Mental Health Review Tribunal to determine the legality of the ongoing detention of a patient, and refers the issue of the displacement of a nearest relative to the county court) but also with the courts which deal with questions of public law (in particular the Administrative Court) and the civil litigation courts.</p>


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
C W Van Staden

Reductionist and non-reductionist philosophers and mental health professionals have debated about what and where the self is. In this article I deploy a neo-Fregean theory to clarify the process by which: (i) the self becomes so susceptible to this debate; and (ii) the self presents so variably in personal experiences. Accordingly, the self can be either estranged or well equipped, depending on the position it occupies in relations, whether in the conceptualisation or in the personal experiences of the self.


2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Freud

In view of our postmodern Zeitgeist, and our shrinking world, we come upon identity as a concept that needs to be reconsidered. This paper examines the various categories that constitute identity, such as age, gender, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, race and even family. Each category forms a collection of values. These categories are viewed as socially constructed, usually with fuzzy boundaries, and have often been used for malignant purposes such as warfare, persecution, and discrimination. If people become identified with only one or two categories, either out of choice or through coercion, the identification negates the many elements that constitute the self, and it may lead to hostility and warfare against all “outsiders.” Identity is not viewed as a static structure, since different categories become foreground or background, depending on social, political, and historical circumstances. The author uses her own identity-voyage to illustrate her thoughts. Mental health professionals should try to propagate manifold categories for many-sided selves that will avoid pitting groups of people against each other and promote inclusive rather than exclusive identities. Therapists should be in the forefront in dialogues about values for the new century and this paper is a step in this direction.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1159-1159
Author(s):  
M. Torreblanca ◽  
E. Zallo ◽  
O. Euba

IntroductionElectroconvulsive therapy is nowadays one of the most useful treatments for severe mental disorders. A lot of patients refer an improvement or even a remission of their psychopathology after this treatment.ObjectivesTo demonstrate how cinema has favoured the creation of a social stigma against mental health professionals, against the treatments we use and, most of all, against the people we treat.We based this project on the portrait cinema has meade of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).MethodsECT appears in more than thirty films. We take into account the most representative ones shot from 1948 to 2008.ResultsECT makes its debut in cinema in 1948, ten years after its first use as a psychiatric treatment. During 60 years, ECT comes on stage in more than 30 films. The main indication in cinema to use ECT is to control and punish antisocial behaviors. Medical consent is not asked in most of the films. The ECT modified procedure doesn’t appear.ConclusionsCinema has contributed to stigmatize mental illness, psychiatrists and treatments we use, specially electroconvulsive therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document