Assessment and Attempted Modification of Future Teachers' Attitudes toward Handicapped Children

1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 540-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Parish ◽  
Gerald M. Eads ◽  
Nancy H. Reece ◽  
Mary A. Piscitello

In a study designed to determine whether future teachers have negative attitudes toward groups of exceptional children based upon the labels attached to these children, 13 special education majors and 32 students majoring in other fields of education were administered the Personal Attribute Inventory at the beginning and conclusion of an introductory course in special education. Results for labels, physically handicapped, educable mentally handicapped, and learning disabled, indicated that the latter two were evaluated significantly less positively than the first on both pre- and post-course testings. There were no significant differences between the respondents' pre- and post-course ratings of the three labels. Interestingly, special education majors were significantly more positive in their pre- and post-course evaluations than non-special education majors. These findings certainly are not supportive of “mainstreaming” children who have been categorized as either learning disabled or educable mentally handicapped.

1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
Yoram Hartogson ◽  
Joseph Trainer ◽  
Norman M. Chansky

Author(s):  
Anita Pedisić

Many studies have shown that attitudes towards handicapped persons differ according to various professional orientations. This study investigated the attitudes of students of special education (N=109) and students of economy (N=115) towards physically handicapped persons. The criterion variable of attitudes were represented by scales which reflect two factors of the cognitive components of attitudes (“The implication of deviant characteristics and the segregation of physically handicapped persons”) and one factor pertaining to the affective component (“Unease in interaction”). The results showed differences in the attitudes of the two groups of students which were to be expected. Namely, the students of special education expressed fewer negative attitudes towards physically handicapped persons both on the cognitive and on the affective scale measures. With the aim of discovering the predictors of attitude, scales were also used which examined how much the students expressed fear of the negative evaluation of physically handicapped persons (as an indicator of social anxiety), to what measure they establish contact with these persons and how essential they hold the physical appearance of other persons. It was shown that students of special education had less fear of the possibility of negative evaluation, were less directed to the physical appearance of other persons and established a more frequent and more qualitative contact with physically handicapped persons. Considering the results of regressive analysis which showed a similar constellation of attitude predictors amongst students with different professional orientations and the significant differences in the results of predictive variables, maybe the less negative attitudes amongst students of special education can be explained by their lesser anxiety and fear concerning proper behaviout, the better relationship which they establish with physically handicapped persons and the lesser extent to which they are orientated towards the outer appearance of others. Considering the specific education these students acquire such an explanation seems plausible.


1981 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 53-56
Author(s):  
Robert S. Matulis

A look at recent developments in the teaching of mathematics to special education students can benefit anyone interested or involved in the mathematics education of mentally retarded, learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, physically handicapped, or brain-damaged students. The following bibliography lists nearly two hundred articles from about fony periodicals. The articles include reports of successful practices, surv.eys, research summaries, suggestions, reviews, and opinions about mathematics for students with special learning problems.


1978 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
Ellen J. Hofeldt ◽  
Larry L. Hofeldt

College students and university mathematics professors frequently ask, “Do special education majors need detailed training in mathematics?” This article will assert and delineate the necessity of an all-encompassing background for special education teacher trainees. The special education teacher trainee certainly needs no less thorough training in any area than a regular elementary teacher trainee.


1980 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Waters

Federal legislation has mandated that a ll children with special education needs should have those specific needs met by the school. Included in this special education group along with the learning disabled, physically handicapped, and mentally reta rded are the gifted and ta lented children. This public mandate and reawakened interest in the early identi fica tion and education of gifted and talented children has brought into sharp focus some serious curriculum problems and interesting challenges to teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document