Effects of Delay on Color Priming for Natural Objects

2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 275-293
Author(s):  
David Vernon ◽  
Toby J. Lloyd-Jones

Using a standard study-test procedure, color priming was examined through effects of color transformation, from correctly colored to incorrectly colored and vice versa, for natural objects with pre-existing color-shape associations, e.g., yellow banana. More specifically these effects were examined at study-test delays of 0, 24, and 48 hr. When deciding whether an object was correctly colored, color transformation eliminated priming. Furthermore, there was evidence that for objects that were not transformed, priming was stronger for correctly as compared with incorrectly colored objects. In addition, the introduction of 24- and 48-hr. delays between the study and the test phase of the task reduced the effects of color transformation on priming. These findings are discussed in terms of the representations that mediate implicit memory performance.

2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan E. Mitton ◽  
Chris M. Fiacconi

Abstract. To date there has been relatively little research within the domain of metamemory that examines how individuals monitor their performance during memory tests, and whether the outcome of such monitoring informs subsequent memory predictions for novel items. In the current study, we sought to determine whether spontaneous monitoring of test performance can in fact help individuals better appreciate their memory abilities, and in turn shape future judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, in two experiments we examined recognition memory for visual images across three study-test cycles, each of which contained novel images. We found that across cycles, participants’ JOLs did in fact increase, reflecting metacognitive sensitivity to near-perfect levels of recognition memory performance. This finding suggests that individuals can and do monitor their test performance in the absence of explicit feedback, and further underscores the important role that test experience can play in shaping metacognitive evaluations of learning and remembering.


1995 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne M. Harris ◽  
Roger D. Adams ◽  
Ross G. Menzies ◽  
Brett K. Hayes

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S164-S164
Author(s):  
J Daniel Ragland ◽  
Xionan Liu ◽  
Ashley Williams ◽  
Cameron Carter ◽  
Tara Niendam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rather than solely assessing participant knowledge, memory tests can also facilitate long-term storage and retrieval, thereby improving episodic memory for newly studied information compared to having participants spend equal amounts of time re-studying that same information. This so called “testing effect” has been widely promoted in educational settings as a way to improve delayed recall of new information but, to our knowledge, has not been investigated as a way to improve memory in people with psychotic disorders. The goal of this study is to determine if the testing effect can be used to improve well-documented deficits in delayed recall in people with early psychosis spectrum disorders. Methods In this within-subjects design, 20 people within 5 years of onset of a psychosis spectrum disorder (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder) and 13 demographically matched healthy controls were studied at two time points. During the first visit, a three-part 45-minute PowerPoint presentation on “what is?”, “what causes?” and “how do we treat?” psychosis was presented in small group settings. After each of the 3 parts of the presentation participants were required to re-study half of the information that had just been presented and were tested on the other half of the presented information. This re-study/test procedure was repeated again a second time to promote learning and participants were instructed to return again in one week for final testing. During the second visit participants were given a final recall test on all the information included in the original presentation. Percent recall scores were examined for main effects of group, practice procedure (re-study/test) and group by procedure interactions using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). To account for any group differences in overall recall, a Testing Effect score was also calculated by dividing the difference in recall for information that had been tested versus restudied, by the average recall across the two conditions. Results All participants understood the task and completed both sessions. Reflecting the overall testing effect, ANOVA revealed a main effect of task [F(1,31)=8.2, p<.01)] with all participants showing better percent recall after one week for information that had been tested (Mean+SD=47.2 + 14.0) versus re-studied (Mean+SD=34.1 + 14.8) during their first visit. There was also a main effect of group [F(1,31)= 8.1, p<.01], and a task by group interaction [F(1,31)=4.3, p<.05]. To further investigate this interaction, the Testing Effect score was examined, which did not reveal any group difference [t(32)=.35, p=.73] in the percent recall improvement following testing versus re-study between patients (Mean+SD=36.6 + 45.2) and controls (Mean+SD=41.5 + 32.0). Discussion When group differences in overall memory performance are accounted for, initial results suggest that people with psychotic disorders show the same benefit from being tested on recently studied information as do healthy participants. Simply testing patients on new information versus having them spend the same amount of time re-studying that information led to the same improvement in free recall following a one-week delay as what was seen in healthy volunteers. These results support further investigation of how the testing effect might be incorporated into cognitive remediation efforts as well as future neuroimaging studies to identify neural correlates of this positive outcome.


1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Perruchet ◽  
Patrice Baveux

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Jelicic ◽  
Annette E. Bonebakker ◽  
Benno Bonke

Memory can be assessed with either explicit or implicit tasks. Implicit memory tasks, in contrast with explicit tasks, do not refer to conscious recollection of a previous learning experience. Implicit memory is revealed by a change in task performance that can be attributed to previous learning. Amnesic patients perform poorly on explicit memory tasks, but exhibit normal performance on implicit tasks. Recently, researchers have studied the implicit memory performance of patients with Alzheimer's disease. This article aims to give an overview of the performance of Alzheimer patients on four tasks of implicit memory. Compared with normal elderly controls, patients with Alzheimer's disease seem to demonstrate impaired performance on conceptual, but not on perceptual, implicit memory tasks. This dissociation could yield important information about the neurologic systems subserving implicit memory processes. Some suggestions for future research into the implicit memory of Alzheimer patients are given.


1995 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Richard Ferraro ◽  
Margaret Okerlund

In the present study a form of implicit memory performance was examined by employing the serial reaction-time paradigm with a nonclinical sample of 22 hypothetically schizotypal college students and 22 nonschizotypal college students. The formation of new associations was tested; analysis showed no difference between these two groups on this measure of implicit memory.


1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 764-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gezinus Wolters ◽  
Arno Prinsen

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolin Sievers ◽  
Louis Renoult

Repeated study typically improves episodic memory performance. Two different types of explanations of this phenomenon have been put forward: 1) reactivating the same representations strengthens and stabilizes memories, or, in contrast, 2) greater encoding variability - through changes in context - benefits memory by promoting richer traces and a larger variety of retrieval cues. The present experiment was designed to directly compare these predictions in a design with multiple repeated study episodes, allowing to dissociate memory for studied items and their context of study. Participants repeatedly encoded names of famous people four times, either in the same task (optimal encoding for a reactivation view), or in different tasks (optimal encoding for an encoding variability view). During the test phase, an old/new judgement task was used to assess item memory, followed by a source memory judgement about the encoding task. Consistent with predictions from the encoding variability view, encoding stimulus in different contexts resulted in higher item memory and lower rates of forgetting. In contrast, consistent with the reactivation view, source memory performance was higher when participants encoded stimuli in the same task repeatedly. Taken together, our findings indicate that encoding variability benefits episodic memory, by increasing the number of items that are recalled and by decreasing forgetting. These benefits are however at the expenses of source recollection and memory for details, which are decreased, likely due to interference and generalisation across contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document