Comprehensiveness of Strategic Planning: The Importance of Heterogeneity of a Top Team

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Bantel

A conceptual model linking the demographic heterogeneity of the top management team to comprehensiveness of strategic planning is developed. Planning comprehensiveness is one of the key dimensions underlying the dominant models of formulation of strategy, consistent with the tradition of “synoptic” strategic planning. Drawing on group process theory, heterogeneity among team members in outlooks and perspectives, represented by their demographic backgrounds, is expected to stimulate an open, broad, and challenge-oriented approach to the process of strategic planning, consistent with comprehensiveness. Heterogeneity on five characteristics—age, organizational tenure, team tenure, functional background, and educational curriculum—was included. Also discussed are the complexities of managing the group process of a heterogeneous team and additional influences, external to the team, on the comprehensiveness of strategic planning.

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyootai Lee ◽  
Marianna Makri ◽  
Terri Scandura

Does family membership differentiate family and nonfamily top management team (TMT) members’ ownership-based motivations to pursue corporate entrepreneurship? We adopt the concept of psychological ownership to answer this question. Based on a sample of 192 TMT members from 90 Korean companies, this study found that family and nonfamily TMT members do not differ in the levels of psychological ownership of the organization or that of the job, nor do the two groups differ in the emphasis they place on corporate entrepreneurship. Family involvement and nepotism mitigate this relationship, but only for nonfamily TMT members. These results help reconcile discrepant findings for family versus nonfamily TMT members’ agency and stewardship behaviors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 10290
Author(s):  
Sabrina Schell ◽  
Julia Katharina de Groote ◽  
Salome Richards ◽  
Andreas Hack

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Alex Bolinger ◽  
Jeff Brookman ◽  
Paul Thistle

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to examine the relative contributions of the CEO and other (non-CEO) top management team members to firm performance. Using data from ExecuComp, we analyze 2,687 CEOs and 11,501 other top management team (TMT) members, by industry, during the period 2004–2017 using variance decomposition methods. We find that other TMT member effects are important but are smaller than CEO effects. We also find that the effect of new TMT members appointed by the CEO on firm performance is larger than the effect of continuing TMT members and that this differential effect on performance increases with CEO tenure.


Author(s):  
Don Knight ◽  
Craig L. Pearce ◽  
Ken G. Smith ◽  
Judy D. Olian ◽  
Henry P. Sims ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document