scholarly journals Linking a performance management system and competencies: Qualitative research

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Korenková ◽  
Ján Závadský ◽  
Marcin Lis
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Management System ◽  
Business Performance ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Performance Management System ◽  
Competency Based ◽  
A Performance

Abstract The main purpose of the paper is to identify the group of indicators that are most widely used in the manufacturing area worldwide, to identify the responsibility and authority for measuring and evaluating business performance, and to create an illustrative competency-based model for a performance management system within a business. The paper covers two areas that are important in the maintenance of sustainable business performance. The first area focuses on a performance management system and its key performance indicators as an important element in every performance management system within a business. The article also presents the theoretical background of the Z-MESOT method, which is applied to define the consistency of these indicators in practice. The second area is dedicated to defining a competency-based model and competences related to the measurement and assessment of performance, which have been extracted from other general competences. This paper presents findings from qualitative research to eliminate the bottlenecks of the Z-MESOT matrix that was transposed into a questionnaire. The questionnaire, as well as structured interviews, helped identify differences in responsibility attributes of the Z-MESOT matrix regarding the size of the researched businesses. The paper offers a list of competences related to the key performance indicators that can be used for following theoretical and practical research.

scholarly journals ENHANCING LECTURER’S “TRI DHARMA” THROUGH PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: A STUDY AT AN INDONESIAN PRIVATE UNIVERSITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Yuliani Rachma Putri ◽  
Syarifuddin Syarifuddin
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Management System ◽  
Private University ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Strategic Communication ◽  
Performance Management System ◽  
Balance Score Card ◽  
System A ◽  
Score Card

For the last decades, Institution of Higher Learning (IHL) activities has become more complex. Competitive environment, technological advances, stakeholder and profit- oriented markets have demanded IHLs to facilitate broad areas of activities which require many resources ranging from human to technical. Thus, IHL’s managers as decision-makers faced the problems of finding the right performance measurement and the proper usage of Performance Management System (PMS) for measuring all of the performances especially for lecturers which measured by Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) known as “Tri Dharma”. Hence, this study aims to examine the use of performance management system at one faculty of an Indonesian private university. This research is the extended version from the paper presented on 3rd Icotic 2017, titled “A Study of Strategic Communication in Supporting the Performance Management System: A Case at an Indonesian Private University”. Using semi- structured interviews with 12 managers at the faculty, this study was examine how the PMS used to support lecturers in conducting the “Tri Dharma” activities by providing the guidance to reach the objectives and target of the institution. The qualitative evidence collected during the course of the research indicates that private university is now being highly competitive and it is very sensitive to changes in technology, student tastes and behaviours. In so doing, IHLs managers have to set up some suitable indicators to be measured through the Balance Score Card (BSC) as the PMS that allows faculty managerial level to translate their visions into collective visions that enhance all lecturers as teams to move in a shared-service and value-creating work. This PMS also used as a strategy map to guide with signposts and guardrails to construct and to motivate all lecturers to reach the KPIs also to maintain their performance in conducting “Tri Dharma” by linking the salary, increment, bonus to performance and make quarterly report to evaluate. Keywords: Performance Management System, Key Performance Indicators, Balance Score Card

Management’s Perception of Key Performance Indicators for Vietnam Small and Medium Enterprises

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ta Huy Hung
Keyword(s):  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Management System ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Performance Management System ◽  
Sustained Competitive Advantage ◽  
Manufacturing Performance ◽  
And Performance

Key Performance Indicators in performance management system was attracted by researchers and practitioners. In order to effective implemented KPIs in SMEs, managers must deeply understand about the KPIs, role of KPIs, implemented KPIs. Based on the quantitative method by doing survey with 162 SEMs, author indicated the current situation of the perception of SMEs manager about the fundamental of KPI, roles of KPIs  and difficulty implemented KPIs in performance management system. Based on the consistent theory about KPIs , author proposed some solution for manager to enhance their knowledge of KPIs. Keywords SMEs, KPIs , Performance appraisal References Ahmad, M. M., & Dhafr, N. (2002). Establishing and improving manufacturing performance measures. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 18(3), 171-176. Aylin Ates, Patrizia Garengo, Paola Cocca, Umit Bititci (2013), The development of SME managerial practice for effective performance management, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 28-54Ayoup, H., Omar, N. H., & Rahman, I. K. A. (2012). Implementation of Balance Scorecard (BSC) in a Malaysian GLC: Perceptions of Middle Managers. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 7(2), 99-126.Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’ Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120Cagliano, R., Blackmon, K. and Voss, C. (2001).Small firms under microscope: international differences in production/operations management practices and performance. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12, 469– 482.Corbett, L. M. (1998). Benchmarking manufacturing performance in Australia and New Zealand. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 5(4), 271-282. De Waal, A. A. (2003). Behavioral factors important for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems. Management Decision, 41(8), 688-697.Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., & Bititci, U. S. (2005). Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 7(1), 25-47.Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long range planning, 34(5), 585-604. Evans, N. (2005). Assessing the Balanced Scorecard as a Management Tool for Hotels, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality, Management Accounting, 17, 5 : 376-390.Jakelski, D., & Lebrasseur, R. (1997). Implementing continuous improvement in the North American mining industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 55(2), 165-177. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5): Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994), ‘Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective’, Academy of management review, 19(4), 699-727.Mai Thanh Lan (2016), Xây dựng các năng lực cho nhà quản trị cấp trung nhằm nâng cao năng lực cạnh tranh của doanh nghiệp, Tạp chí Kinh tế & phát triển, 225, 90-99.Lê Quân (2015), Lãnh đạo doanh nghiệp Việt Nam: Hội đồng quản trị; Ban điều hành; Khung năng lực; Thẻ điểm cân bằng; Chỉ số hoàn thành, NXB Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội, Hà Nội.Martins, R.A. and Salerno, M.S. (1999). Use of new performance measurement system, some empirical findings. In Managing Operations Networks – VI International EurOMA Conference, Venice, Italy, 7–8 JuneParmenter, D. (2010). Key performance indicators (KPI): developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs: John Wiley & Sons.Rodriguez, R. R., Saiz, J. J. A., & Bas, A. O. (2009). Quantitative relationships between key performance indicators for supporting decision-making processes. Computers in Industry, 60(2), 104-113. Shahin, A., & Mahbod, M. A. (2007). Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(3), 226-240.Nguyễn Đình Thọ (2012). Phương pháp nghiên cứu khoa học trong kinh doanh. Thiết kế và thực hiện. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Lao động xã hộiTsai, Y.-C., & Cheng, Y.-T. (2012). Analyzing key performance indicators (KPIs) for E-commerce and Internet marketing of elderly products: A review. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 55(1), 126-132. Yeung, J. F., Chan, A. P., & Chan, D. W. (2009). A computerized model for measuring and benchmarking the partnering performance of construction projects. Automation in Construction, 18(8), 1099-1113.  

scholarly journals Organisational readiness for introducing a performance management system

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ochurub ◽  
Mark Bussin ◽  
Xenia Goosen
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Change Readiness ◽  
Readiness For Change ◽  
The Body ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Performance Management System ◽  
Performance Management Systems ◽  
Managerial Implications ◽  
A Performance

Orientation: The successful introduction of performance management systems to the public service requires careful measurement of readiness for change. Research purpose: This study investigated the extent to which employees were ready for change as an indication of whether their organisation was ready to introduce a performance management system (PMS).Motivation for the study: Introducing system changes in organisations depends on positive employee preconditions. There is some debate over whether organisations can facilitate these preconditions. This research investigates change readiness linked to the introduction of a PMS in a public sector organisation. The results add to the growing literature on levels of change readiness.Research design, approach and method: The researchers used a quantitative, questionnairebased design. Because the organisation was large, the researchers used stratified sampling to select a sample from each population stratum. The sample size was 460, which constituted 26% of the total population. They used a South African change readiness questionnaire to elicit employee perceptions and opinions.Main findings: The researchers found that the organisation was not ready to introduce a PMS. The study identified various challenges and key factors that were negatively affecting the introduction of a PMS.Practical/managerial implications: The intention to develop and introduce performance management systems is generally to change the attitudes, values and approaches of managers and employees to the new strategies, processes and plans to improve productivity and performance. However, pre-existing conditions and attitudes could have an effect. It is essential to ensure that organisations are ready to introduce performance management systems and to provide sound change leadership to drive the process effectively. This study contributes to the body of knowledge about the challenges and factors organisations should consider when they introduce performance management systems.Contribution/value-add: This research adds to the knowledge about aspects of change readiness, change management and introducing change initiatives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document