scholarly journals Sensory Feedback in Upper Limb Prostheses

Author(s):  
Dace Dimante ◽  
Ināra Logina ◽  
Marco Sinisi ◽  
Angelika Krūmiņa

Abstract Loss of an arm is a devastating condition that can cross all socioeconomic groups. A major step forward in rehabilitation of amputees has been the development of myoelectric prostheses. Current robotic arms allow voluntary movements by using residual muscle contraction. However, a significant issue is lack of movement control and sensory feedback. These factors play an important role in integration and embodiment of a robotic arm. Without feedback, users rely on visual cues and experience overwhelming cognitive demand that results in poorer use of a prosthesis. The complexity of the afferent system presents a great challenge of creating a closed-loop hand prosthesis. Several groups have shown progress providing sensory feedback for upper limb amputees using robotic arms. Feedback, although still limited, is achieved through direct implantation of intraneural electrodes as well as through non-invasive methods. Moreover, evidence shows that over time some amputees develop a phantom sensation of the missing limb on their stump. This phenomenon can occur spontaneously as well as after non-invasive nerve stimulation, suggesting the possibility of recreating a sensory homunculus of the hand on the stump. Furthermore, virtual reality simulation in combination with mechanical stimulation of skin could augment the sensation phenomenon, leading to better interface between human and robotic arms.

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Svensson ◽  
Ulrika Wijk ◽  
Anders Björkman ◽  
Christian Antfolk

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 1828-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Omrani ◽  
Matthew T. Kaufman ◽  
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos ◽  
Paul D. Cheney

Primary motor cortex has been studied for more than a century, yet a consensus on its functional contribution to movement control is still out of reach. In particular, there remains controversy as to the level of control produced by motor cortex (“low-level” movement dynamics vs. “high-level” movement kinematics) and the role of sensory feedback. In this review, we present different perspectives on the two following questions: What does activity in motor cortex reflect? and How do planned motor commands interact with incoming sensory feedback during movement? The four authors each present their independent views on how they think the primary motor cortex (M1) controls movement. At the end, we present a dialogue in which the authors synthesize their views and suggest possibilities for moving the field forward. While there is not yet a consensus on the role of M1 or sensory feedback in the control of upper limb movements, such dialogues are essential to take us closer to one.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nader Fallahian ◽  
Hassan Saeedi ◽  
Hamidreza Mokhtarinia ◽  
Farhad Tabatabai Ghomshe

Background and aim:Sensory feedback systems have been of great interest in upper-limb prosthetics. Despite tremendous research, there are no commercial modality-matched feedback systems. This article aims to introduce the first detachable and feedback add-on option that can be attached to in-use prostheses.Technique:A sensory feedback system was tested on a below-elbow myoelectric prosthesis. The aim was to have the amputee grasp fragile objects without crushing while other accidental feedback sources were blocked.Discussion:A total of 8 successful trials (out of 10) showed that sensory feedback system decreased the amputee’s visual dependency by improving awareness of his prosthesis. Sensory feedback system can be used either as post-fabrication (prosthetic add-on option) or para-fabrication (incorporated into prosthetic design). The use of these direct feedback systems can be explored with a current prosthesis before ordering new high-tech prosthesis.Clinical relevanceThis technical note introduces the first attach/detach-able sensory feedback system that can simply be added to in-use (myo)electric prosthesis, with no obligation to change prosthesis design or components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document