scholarly journals A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human Motor Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathon W. Sensinger ◽  
Strahinja Dosen
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 172988142199858
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Gulletta ◽  
Eliana Costa e Silva ◽  
Wolfram Erlhagen ◽  
Ruud Meulenbroek ◽  
Maria Fernanda Pires Costa ◽  
...  

As robots are starting to become part of our daily lives, they must be able to cooperate in a natural and efficient manner with humans to be socially accepted. Human-like morphology and motion are often considered key features for intuitive human–robot interactions because they allow human peers to easily predict the final intention of a robotic movement. Here, we present a novel motion planning algorithm, the Human-like Upper-limb Motion Planner, for the upper limb of anthropomorphic robots, that generates collision-free trajectories with human-like characteristics. Mainly inspired from established theories of human motor control, the planning process takes into account a task-dependent hierarchy of spatial and postural constraints modelled as cost functions. For experimental validation, we generate arm-hand trajectories in a series of tasks including simple point-to-point reaching movements and sequential object-manipulation paradigms. Being a major contribution to the current literature, specific focus is on the kinematics of naturalistic arm movements during the avoidance of obstacles. To evaluate human-likeness, we observe kinematic regularities and adopt smoothness measures that are applied in human motor control studies to distinguish between well-coordinated and impaired movements. The results of this study show that the proposed algorithm is capable of planning arm-hand movements with human-like kinematic features at a computational cost that allows fluent and efficient human–robot interactions.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Boulanger ◽  
F. Buisseret ◽  
V. Dehouck ◽  
F. Dierick ◽  
O. White

AbstractNatural human movements are stereotyped. They minimise cost functions that include energy, a natural candidate from mechanical and physiological points of view. In time-changing environments, however, motor strategies are modified since energy is no longer conserved. Adiabatic invariants are relevant observables in such cases, although they have not been investigated in human motor control so far. We fill this gap and show that the theory of adiabatic invariants explains how humans move when gravity varies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document