scholarly journals Hemorrhagic complications of pancreatitis in surgical practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
L. A. Neledova ◽  
D. V. Mizgiriov ◽  
B. L. Duberman
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Splenic Artery ◽  
Retroperitoneal Space ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Selective Angiography ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complications

Theobjectiveof the study was to detect the frequency and sources of hemorrhagic complications in patients with pancreatitis, evaluate the tactics and effectiveness of methods of hemostasis.Material and methods.A retrospective analysis of hemorrhagic complications of pancreatitis was carried out in 40 patients.Results.Bleeding developed mainly on the background of infected acute necrotic collections (77.8 %), the main source of bleeding was the splenic artery (37.0 %). Emergency laparotomy for bleeding was performed in 9 (22.5 %) patients, selective angiography was performed in 10 patients, it was effective only in 5 (50 %) cases. 12 (44.4 %) deaths were recorded in cases of arrosive bleeding.Conclusion.The preferred tactics in case of bleeding from the retroperitoneal space during minimally invasive treatment is crossclamping of drains and endovascular hemostasis.

scholarly journals EAU, AUA and NICE Guidelines on Surgical and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Critical Appraisal of the Guidelines Using the AGREE-II Tool

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dmitry Enikeev ◽  
Vincent Misrai ◽  
Enrique Rijo ◽  
Roman Sukhanov ◽  
Denis Chinenov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Agree Ii ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Nice Guideline ◽  
Agree Ii Tool

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To critically appraise the methodological rigour of the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) vis-à-vis BPH surgery as used by specialist research associations in the US, Europe and UK, and to compare whether the guidelines cover all or only some of the available treatments. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The current guidelines issued by the EUA, AUA and NICE associations have been analyzed by 4 appraisers using the AGREE-II instrument. We also compared the recommendations given in the guidelines for surgical and minimally invasive treatment to find out which of these CPGs include most of the available treatment options. <b><i>Results:</i></b> According to the AGREE II tool, the median scores of domains were: domain 1 scope and purpose 66.7%, domain 2 stakeholder involvement 50.0%, domain 3 rigor of development 65.1%, domain 4 clarity of presentation 80.6%, domain 5 applicability 33.3%, domain 6 editorial independence 72.9%. The overall assessment according to AGREE II is 83.3%. The NICE guideline scored highest on 5 out of 6 domains and the highest overall assessment score (91.6%). The EAU guideline scored lowest on 4 out of 6 domains and has the lowest overall assessment score (79.1%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The analyzed CPGs comprehensively highlight the minimally invasive and surgical treatment options for BPH. According to the AGREE II tool, the domains for clarity of presentation and editorial independence received the highest scores. The stakeholder involvement and applicability domains were ranked as the lowest. Improving the CPG in these domains may help to improve the clinical utility and applicability of CPGs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document