scholarly journals A DESCRIPTIVE MODEL OF THE DESIGNER'S PROBLEM-SOLVING ACTIVITY DURING THE LATER PHASES OF THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS

Author(s):  
Damien Motte ◽  
Per-Erik Andersson ◽  
Robert Bjärnemo

Many specific and precise methods that support the mechanical engineering designer’s work during the conceptual design phase exist, while only a few general methods address the embodiment design and detail design phases. Our study presents the pattern of the designer’s problem-solving activity during the later phases of the design process. This model is in-tended to serve as a basis for further development of tools and methods directly oriented towards the de-signer at work in these stages of the design process. The descriptive model presented here is developed through observations of six designers at work in con-trolled experiments, and follows a previous study published elsewhere.

Author(s):  
Damien Motte ◽  
Per-Erik Andersson ◽  
Robert Bjärnemo

Most methods that guide the designer through the later phases of the design process are general in nature, and it is up to the designer to organize the design work using the tools and techniques available. This process also relies greatly on experience, which is quite a challenge for students, who are mostly novices in the area. In a comparative study, the evolution of the experience and skills acquired by the students in performing design tasks during the embodiment design and detail design phases has been analyzed. The re-sults indicate the main directions for improvement in teaching the later phases of the mechanical engineer-ing design process.


Author(s):  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Dong He ◽  
Y. Lin ◽  
W. J. Zhang

This paper first provides a critical review of the literature regarding the contemporary apparel (product) design process, and then proposes a new apparel design process. Apparel is a general term for products which covers dress, skirt, etc. The new apparel design process applies a so-called systematic design approach well known to field of design. The systematic design approach classifies a design into four phases, namely, task classification, conceptual design, embodiment design, and detail design. The four phases are then tailored to apparel design. The new apparel design process is thus more rational and systematic. The paper uses a gown (a type of apparel) design as a case to illustrate the benefit of this new apparel design process, i.e., improved potentials to make apparel design more creative and efficient.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34-35 ◽  
pp. 988-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sui Ran Yu ◽  
Rui Bin Zhang

This paper presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) method in different design process. This method can help product designers to make more environmental friendly design decisions in the design process. In this method, product’s LCA model is established in product conceptual design phase with the aid of decision matrix. Thereafter, the model is improved in the latter design phases, especially in product detail design phases. In this process, with the help of LCA software, designers can evaluate different design options and get LCA results when necessary to guide the design process. Finally, a case study of designing a coffee pot is provided in this paper to illustrate the efficiency and effectiveness of this method. The case study shows that the method performs very well in the design process. It can be used to help designers to make more environmental friendly design decisions.


Author(s):  
Vincent Wilczynski ◽  
Andrew C. Foley

The assessment of Student Outcomes is an import component for program evaluation and improvement. Though not proposed as the only tool a program should employ to measure the achievement of outcomes, the capstone design course can be a valuable mechanism to measure performance with regards to Student Outcomes. Because of the expansive reach of the engineering design process, capstone design projects present a natural environment to structure assessment activities that directly map to Student Outcomes. This paper presents versions of the Mechanical Engineering capstone design course that have been specifically structured to assess achievement of Student Outcomes commonly included in engineering accreditation criteria. Typically the outcomes are assessed by assignments that guide the engineering design process.


Author(s):  
D. W. Ruth ◽  
M. G. Britton

If the teaching of engineering is indeed the practice of engineering, then it stands to reason that the development of engineering curricula can be treated as an engineering design problem. In this paper, the authors apply the engineering design process to develop a list of courses, for a Mechanical Engineering Program, that conforms to the constraints of the Canadian system of engineering accreditation. For the purpose of this exercise, the following steps are used to define the engineering design process: identical and delimit the problem, establish the outline of the solution (and alternatives), break the problem into its constituent parts, analyze the parts, synthesize the parts into a final configuration, and document the solution. The limits and constraints on the solution are based on the criteria specified by the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB), the syllabus specified by the Canadian Engineering Qualifications Board (CEQB), some common rules-of-thumb, and previously published work by the authors. By utilizing the engineering design process, schools of engineering and applied science can ensure that their curricula, at least at the level of the course specification, will conform to the CEAB and CEQB requirements. As a final exercise, variations on the curriculum are studied to analyze the possibility of introducing such additional elements as options and minors, expanded studies in the arts and humanities, and development of skills in additional languages.


Author(s):  
Johan Malmqvist ◽  
Roger Axelsson ◽  
Mikael Johansson

Abstract This paper presents a comparative analysis of two design methodologies; the Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving (TIPS) and the systematic approach of Pahl and Beitz (SAPB). The methodologies are compared with respect to a number of aspects; similarities and differences are highlighted. It is then suggested that a more powerful methodology may result if the methodologies are unified and that such a unification should use SAPB as an underlying design process model being complemented by TIPS elements at certain points. This is because the SAPB has a wider scope as a design process model, covering the whole process from task clarification to detail design and component as well as systems design, whereas TIPS features some very useful elements (engineering systems evolution laws, standards and principles) that are not included in the SAPB.


Author(s):  
Brian W. Henson

Abstract This paper describes a new module in embodiment design that updates the teaching of engineering design at Level 2 in the School of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Leeds. The new module is team-based, uses a 3D solid modeling system and emphasizes the process over the product of the design process. The module replaces one in which students worked alone to produce a detailed drawing of a sub-assembly at a drafting board. The development and content of the module, and the congruency of the learning outcomes with the level objectives, are described. Problems associated with the reliability and validity of assessing process-oriented team-based projects are considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document