scholarly journals Expansion of metropolitan areas, land use and sustainability indicators: the case of Valencia (Spain)

Author(s):  
F. Gómez ◽  
L. Montero ◽  
V. De Vicente ◽  
A. Sequí ◽  
J. Langa
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Paolo Avner ◽  
Genevieve Boisjoly ◽  
Carlos K. V. Braga ◽  
Ahmed El-Geneidy ◽  
...  

AbstractAccess (the ease of reaching valued destinations) is underpinned by land use and transport infrastructure. The importance of access in transport, sustainability, and urban economics is increasingly recognized. In particular, access provides a universal unit of measurement to examine cities for the efficiency of transport and land-use systems. This paper examines the relationship between population-weighted access and metropolitan population in global metropolitan areas (cities) using 30-min cumulative access to jobs for 4 different modes of transport; 117 cities from 16 countries and 6 continents are included. Sprawling development with the intensive road network in American cities produces modest automobile access relative to their sizes, but American cities lag behind globally in transit and walking access; Australian and Canadian cities have lower automobile access, but better transit access than American cities; combining compact development with an intensive network produces the highest access in Chinese and European cities for their sizes. Hence density and mobility co-produce better access. This paper finds access to jobs increases with populations sublinearly, so doubling the metropolitan population results in less than double access to jobs. The relationship between population and access characterizes regions, countries, and cities, and significant similarities exist between cities from the same country.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089124242110061
Author(s):  
Robert W. Wassmer

The price of a new home is greater if the land to put it on costs more. In many U.S. metropolitan areas, this generates the widely acknowledged equity concern that low- to moderate-income households spend disproportionately on housing. But high residential land prices translating into high single-family home prices may also generate the efficiency concern of discouraging new workers’ entry into such areas or encouraging existing workers’ exit. The result could be a decrease in economic activity. This research offers panel-data regression evidence in support of the existence of this adverse outcome. Perhaps these findings can raise the saliency of the needed state or federal government intervention to curtail the stringency of local residential land-use regulations. NIMBYs see these land-use regulations as in their jurisdiction’s best interest, but as demonstrated here, such restrictions impose additional metro-wide economic concerns.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089124242110435
Author(s):  
John Landis ◽  
Vincent J. Reina

This study makes three contributions to the debate over the effect of local land use regulations on housing prices and affordability. First, it is more geographically extensive than previous studies, encompassing 336 of the nation's 384 metropolitan areas. Second, it looks at multiple measures of regulatory stringency, not just one. Most prior studies have focused either on a single regulatory measure or index across multiple metropolitan areas, or multiple regulatory measures in a single region. Third, this paper considers the connection between regulatory stringency and housing values as a function of employment growth and per-worker payroll levels. We find that restrictive land use regulations do indeed have a pervasive effect on local home values and rents, and that these effects are magnified in faster-growing and more prosperous economies. We also find more restrictive land use regulations are not associated with faster rates of recent home value or rent growth, and that their effects on housing construction levels—that is, the degree to which they constrain supply—is uneven among different housing markets.


1983 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Nakamura ◽  
Yoshitsugu Hayashi ◽  
Kazuaki Miyamoto

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan O’Brien ◽  
Dietmar Wechsler ◽  
Stefan Bringezu ◽  
Rüdiger Schaldach

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-63
Author(s):  
Hideo Nakamura ◽  
Yoshitsugu Hayashi ◽  
Kazuaki Miyamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document