scholarly journals La ética colaborativa del displazement. La bioética del capitalismo cuestionada por la ética responsiva

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 119-138
Author(s):  
María Teresa Paulín Ríos ◽  
Mario Cantú Toscano
Keyword(s):  
Human Nature ◽  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Physical Discipline ◽  
Paul Ricœur ◽  
Philosophical Writings

Se propone en este texto una comparación entre la ética de la competencia y la ética de la colaboración, basada en dos formas distintas de entender la naturaleza humana. Las autoras se basan en la filosofía de Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Lévinas y Piotr Kropotkin para elaborar una ética de la colaboración, puesta en práctica mediante una disciplina física llamada displazement, la cual puede aportar herramientas filosóficas para actores de la escena actual.The Collaborative Ethics of Displazement. The Bioethics of Capitalism Challenged by Responsive EthicsAbstractThis article compares the ethics of competition with the ethics of collaboration, based on two distinct ways of undestanding human nature. The authors base their argument on the philosophical writings of Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Lévinas and Piotr Kropotkin, in order to propose an ethics of collaboration. This approach is put into practice through a physical discipline called displazement, which may provide philosophical tools for actors.Recibido: 29 de abril de 2020Aceptado: 12 de noviembre de 2020

Linguagem Simbólica e Racionalidade (profética): Um Retorno Filosófico à Religião à Luz de Ricoeur e Lévinas

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Elvis De Oliveira Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Paul Ricœur

É possível um retorno filosófico à religião?  A fim de tentar refletir acerca dessa difícil questão, o presente estudo pretende focar-se no confronto com os desafios do fenômeno religioso que se configura na contemporaneidade, tomando como ponto de referência o encontro entre as contribuições do pensamento filosófico de Paul Ricoeur – que recupera a textualidade da expe-riência religiosa e a fecundi-dade do pensamento ético-filosófico de Emmanuel Lévinas que, por sua vez, propõe o retorno à ética encontrada na tradição talmúdica, a fim de repensar o fenômeno religioso na atualidade.

Love without Boundaries

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Relational Power ◽  
Paul Ricœur ◽  
Letting Go

Reflecting on the author's experience of parenting a son with disabilities and bringing this experience into conversation with authors such as Jean Vanier, Paul Ricoeur, and Emmanuel Levinas, this article suggests that “letting go” and becoming open to another in love is an experience of redemption that marks a conversion of self, one that transgresses boundaries and empowers the deepest kind of mutual belonging imaginable. Moreover, this conversion to another ultimately transforms us in the direction of a conversion to the divine itself, cultivating dispositions of gratitude and hope, for God is the relational power of the whole of reality, that which makes love imaginable, indeed possible.

scholarly journals Paul Ricœur et Emmanuel Levinas: vulnérabilité, mémoire et narration: Peut-on raconter la vulnérabilité?

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-139
Author(s):  
Sophie Galabru
Keyword(s):  
Collective Identity ◽  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Paul Ricœur

In Time and narrative then in Oneself as another Paul Ricœur proposes a philosophy of personal and collective identity, through research on time and narrative. According to these books, emplotment would synthesize and reconcile the temporal discordance, experienced by the selfhood. The subject’s fragmentation by the otherness of time could then define vulnerability. Our aim is to question this triad time-vulnerability-narrative thanks to the opposite positions of Emmanuel Levinas. Unlike Ricœur, Levinas severely criticizes the idea of memory and narrative in order to respect the vulnerability of the other. Yet, the Ricœurian analysis of the responsibility affirms the need for a capable and not dispossessed Self. From this point of view, Ricœur helps us to question the limits set by Levinas to narrative and leads us to wonder if the ethical plot for the vulnerability of others does not need memory and narrative.

scholarly journals Etre fidèle à soi: Féminisme, éthique et justice à la lumière de la philosophie de Paul Ricœur

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Tissot
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Good Life ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Judith Butler ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Feminist Research ◽  
The Good Life ◽  
Feminist Discourse ◽  
Paul Ricœur ◽  
The Subject

In this paper, I read Paul Ricoeur in dialogue with Judith Butler, Emmanuel Levinas and Annie Léchenet. I suggest that Ricoeur’s philosophy provides interesting tools to articulate two simultaneous feminist claims, that is, a claim for recognition and a claim of justice. This article particularly highlights how the Ricoeurian hermeneutics of the subject, which puts self-esteem at the centre of the good life with and for others within just institutions, can provide an interesting frame for feminist research. Through my reading of Ricoeur, by linking more precisely the notions of promise and self-esteem, I argue that Ricoeur’s philosophy allows us to develop a theory of faithfulness to oneself, which, I suggest, is an implicit claim of feminist discourse.

scholarly journals Sí mismo para otro. Un debate sobre ética e identidad en Emmanuel Levinas y Paul Ricoeur

Franciscanum ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (159) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Pedro Enrique García Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Paul Ricœur

A través de la noción de identidad narrativa Paul Ricoeur busca mostrar que una dialéctica entre lo propio y lo ajeno se encuentra presente en toda comprensión. Emmanuel Levinas rechaza esta concepción de la alteridad pues considera que el otro no es reducible a una relación que esté mediada por la reflexión. Considera al otro como un límite de la identidad, no su condición de posibilidad. De esta manera, se analiza la respuesta que ofrece Ricoeur en Sí mismo como otro respecto al estatuto de la alteridad del otro y su relación con la constitución de la identidad del yo.

scholarly journals Hope and Tragedy: insights from religion in the philosophy of Paul Ricoeur

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Amy Daughton
Keyword(s):  
Human Nature ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Human Person ◽  
Religious Discourse ◽  
Political Life ◽  
Political Thinking ◽  
Paul Ricœur ◽  
Religious Thinking

The trajectory of Paul Ricoeur’s thought from the fallible to the capable human person offers a hopeful vision of human nature constitutive of our shared political life. Yet, by necessity, hope arises in response to the tragic, which also features in Ricoeur’s work at the existential and ethical levels. At the same time hope and tragedy represent concepts at the limit of philosophical reasoning, introducing meeting points with religious discourse. Exploring those meeting points reveals the contribution of religious thinking to the understanding of hope and tragedy and establishes Ricoeur’s political thinking as ultimately shaped by their interplay.

scholarly journals Estima de sí y alteridad. Una reflexión a partir de Paul Ricoeur y de Emmanuel Levinas

Franciscanum ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (160) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Francisco Xavier Sánchez Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Paul Ricœur

El texto analiza el breve diálogo epistolar que tuvieron Emmanuel Levinas y Paul Ricoeur poco tiempo después de la publicación de la obra de Ricoeur, Sí mismo como otro, en la cual Ricoeur criticaba a Levinas la «falta de estima de sí» en la constitución del sujeto que responde al otro. A lo cual Levinas se defiende haciendo referencia a la categoría de «elección». El hecho de haber sido elegido por el otro para responderle suscita en mí, sin haberlo previsto, una especie de estima de mí mismo, que me permite descubrirme «otro» de quien yo creía ser al principio. Breve diálogo epistolar entre los dos amigos que nos permite entrar en el centro de sus reflexiones sobre la alteridad.

scholarly journals Who is the other?

1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-190
Author(s):  
Marek Drwięga
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Interpersonal Relations ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Religious Attitude ◽  
The Core ◽  
Ethical Discussion ◽  
Paul Ricœur

This paper deals with the problem of what otherness consists in, and what its foundation is, within the I–Other relation. In this way, the study also explores the limits of ethics and of a quasi-religious attitude, in order to establish what is required to shape interpersonal relations in a non-violent way, when faced with the radical otherness of another human being. Such an investigation also intersects with a broader ethical discussion that aims to take account of glorious or heroic acts, focused on the issue of supererogation. The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the degree to which a neglect of reciprocity and justice in the context of such philosophical research constitutes a risky step. To this end, the main aspects of the debate between Emmanuel Levinas and Paul Ricœur are introduced. After examining the position of Levinas, and how Ricœur interprets the I–Other relation in Levinas, an attempt is made to assess whether the latter’s line of criticism is pertinent and helpful for attempts to arrive at the core of the disagreement between the two thinkers.

Criminology, Public Theology and Hope

2020 ◽  
pp. 145-164
Author(s):  
Andrew Millie
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Public Theology ◽  
Ethical Position ◽  
Paul Ricœur ◽  
Philosophical Writings

This chapter draws on Christian public theology and criminology and considers hope as an alternative to the pains associated with contemporary criminal justice. The chapter draws on philosophical writings where pertinent, in particular Kantian conceptions of human dignity. Jesus’ sermon on the plain is considered that emphasised love for enemies. The implications for criminal justice are considered. The chapter then turns to the work of Paul Ricoeur who, when considering the sermon on the plain, wrote about an economy of gift. It is a logic of superabundance characterised by compassionate generosity that gives without expecting anything in return. The consequences of applying such a Christian ethical position - or as Ricoeur put it, a supra-ethical position - to secular criminal justice are discussed.

La tension de la donation ultime et de la pensée herméneutique de l'application chez Jean-Luc Marion

Dialogue ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Grondin
Keyword(s):  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Paul Ricoeur ◽  
Jean Paul ◽  
Paul Ricœur

La phénoménologie a connu trop peu de sommets créateurs depuis Husserl et Heidegger pour qu'il soit possible d'ignorer le dernier ouvrage de Jean-Luc Marion, aussi superbement écrit qu'il est ambitieux. Certes, de très exhaustives encyclopédies conçues par nos collègues américains, pour lesquels le terme de phénoménologie sert un peu d'équivalent à celui de philosophie continentale (c'est-à-dire «non analytique»!), recenseront des légions de phénoménologues depuis Husserl et Heidegger, mais aucun n'aura eu d'impact vraimentdéterminantsur la conception même de la discipline. Ces listes comprendront de redoutables penseurs comme Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Emmanuel Levinas et Paul Ricœur, où l'on reconnaîtra les plus illustres représentants de la tradition de la phénoménologie française (les autres traditions dites phénoménologiques étant beaucoup moins riches).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document