scholarly journals ANÁLISIS CRÍTICO DE LA LEY DE MEDIOS ALTERNATIVOS PARA LA SOLUCIÓN DE CONFLICTOS DEL ESTADO DE VERACRUZ. (CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW FOR THE FREE AND SOVEREIGN STATE OF VERACRUZ)

2019 ◽  
pp. 110-144
Author(s):  
María Elisa Matilde Ceballos Díaz
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Sovereign State

El presente trabajo realiza un análisis crítico a la Ley de Medios Alternativos de Solución de Conflictos del Estado de Veracruz, con el fin de determinar si esta Ley, así como las instituciones creadas para su aplicación, cumplen con los mandatos establecidos en la Constitución Federal y en los Tratados Internacionales, principalmente que toda la población veracruzana puede acceder a estos procedimientos.

The enforceability of mediation clauses: A critical analysis of English case law

2021 ◽  
pp. 205556362110174
Author(s):  
Markus Petsche
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Mediation Agreement

This article shows that the English case law on the enforceability of mediation clauses presents a number of flaws. First, and most importantly, English courts generally fail to distinguish between the positive and the negative obligations created by such clauses. As a result, they wrongly apply the certainty requirement to the former, rather than the latter, which leads to frequent refusals to enforce mediation clauses in situations where enforcement should be granted. These decisions discourage parties from agreeing to multi-tier dispute resolution clauses providing for preliminary mediation, thus undermining the general policy favouring the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms. Moreover, judicial discretion in deciding whether to give effect to a valid mediation agreement is unjustified and exercised on the basis of questionable considerations.

ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK SEBAGAI PERTIMBANGAN UTAMA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH (Kajian Yuridis Putusan MK Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Edi Hudiata
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Ideal Norm ◽  
Freedom Of Contract ◽  
Binding Force

Since the verdict of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number 93/PUU-X/2012 pronounced on Thursday, August 29, 2013, concerning the judicial review of Law No. 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking, it is no longer dualism dispute resolution. The verdict as well as strengthen the jurisdiction of Religious Court to resolve Islamic banking disputes. In consideration of the judges, judges agreed stating that Article 55 paragraph (2) and (3) of Law No. 21 of 2008 which is an ideal norm, contains no constitutional problems. The problem is the explanation of the constitutional article 55 paragraph (2) of the Act. The emergence of the Constitutional Court verdict No. 93/PUU-X/2012 which substantially states that the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law No. 21 of 2008 does not have binding force, basically does not violate the principle of freedom of contract which is common in contract law. The parties are allowed to make a dispute resolution agreement out of religious court based on provisions as Act No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Keywords: dispute resolution, legal certainty and the principle of freedom of contract

Kajian Ekonomis Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis melalui ADR (Alternative Despute Resolution)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Miswardi Miswardi
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Legal Institution ◽  
Business People ◽  
Minimize Costs

<p align="center"> </p><p><em>In line with the increasing demands of the business in the era of globalization, especially related to the resolution of business conflicts, business people have tried to find alternative dispute resolution methods other than justice. This is because the judicial institution as a legal institution that should be able to play its role in efforts to resolve various kinds of business conflicts, is in reality not as expected by business people. There is support for normative formalities. Therefore alternative dispute resolution institutions can be used as a very possible choice. This alternative institution is considered more effective in various aspects of business dispute resolution, in response to the demands of very fierce business competition. Some economic benefits gained from choosing a solution through ADR (Alternative Despute Resolution) are that this model is not formal, saves more time and also minimize costs in dispute resolution.</em></p><p> </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document