scholarly journals PENGARUH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Rafika Melani ◽  
Idrianita Anis

<em>The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure, the effectiveness of the board of commissioners, institutional ownership and implementation of SFAS 60 (revised 2010) on the enterprise risk management disclosure. The data used in this research is secondary data, , obtained the annual report of the banking industry company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population of this research is the banking industry companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the years 2009-2015, amounting to 161 companies. The collection of samples using purposive sampling method by selecting predefined criteria. This study uses multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that not all independent variables showed a significant effect on the dependent variable. CSR disclosure and effectiveness of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on enterprise risk management disclosure. Meanwhile, institutional ownership has no effect on the enterprise risk management disclosure and the application of SFAS 60 (Revised 2010) has no effect on the enterprise risk management disclosure</em>

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
LINDA SANTIOSO ◽  
NURAINUN BANGUN ◽  
YUNIARWATI YUNIARWATI

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of profitability, enterprise risk management and corporate social responsibility on firm value. The sample of this research limited to manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2013-2015. This research uses 150 data with 50 companies selected per year. Analysis tool used multiple linear regression of SPSS 21.00. The dependent variable on this research is firm value, and the independent variable returns on equity, enterprise risk management, and corporate social responsibility. The result showed that return on equity and enterprise risk management affect the firm value, while corporate social responsibility has no effect on firm value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristofel Cristofel ◽  
Kurniawati Kurniawati

<p><strong><em>ABSTRACT:</em></strong><em> Firm value describes the quality of a company. There are several factors that affect firm value, including, firm risk, the company’s concern for the environment, and how the company is well managed. This research aims to investigate the influence of enterprise risk management, corporate social responsibility and institutional ownership on the firm value. Based on sampling criteria obtained 69 observations of LQ-45 companies during 2016-2018. Multiple linear regression is used to analyze this research. The statistical tool used to process hyphothesis at significance level (</em>α<em>) = 5% is SPSS version 25. The results reveal that enterprise risk management has negative and significance effect on the firm value. This occurs because the disclosure of ERM is more focus on risk (event) identification and lack of information regarding risk assessment and risk response/risk mitigation so that it is captured as negative (bad) news by investors. Meanwhile, corporate social responsibility and institutional ownership have positive and significant effect on the firm value. The result of this research can be used as further study for management to give more attention how the company mitigates its risk so that it provides a positive signal for investors. In addition it is important for the company to maintain the extent of CSR disclosure in the annual report and the effectiveness of monitoring company performance by institutions so as to increase firm value</em></p><p><em><strong>Keywords:</strong> enterprise risk management, corporate social responsibility, institutional ownership, firm value</em></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>ABSTRAK:</strong> Nilai perusahaan menggambarkan kualitas suatu perusahaan. Terdapat sejumlah faktor yang mempengaruhi nilai perusahaan diantaranya risiko perusahaan, kepedulian perusahaan terhadap lingkungan, dan bagaimana perusahaan itu dikelola dengan baik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menginvestigasi pengaruh <em>enterprise risk management, corporate social responsibility</em> dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap nilai perusahaan. Berdasarkan kriteria sampel diperoleh 69 data observasi atas perusahaan LQ-45 selama periode 2016-2018.  Analisis regresi linear berganda digunakan untuk melakukan analisis atas penelitian ini. Alat statistik yang digunakan untuk mengolah pengujian hipotesis pada tingkat signifikasi (α) = 5% adalah SPSS versi 25. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa <em>enterprise risk management </em>memiliki pengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap nilai perusahaan. Hal ini terjadi karena pengungkapan ERM lebih terfokus kepada identifikasi risiko/kejadian dan kurangnya penjelasan terkait penilaian risiko dan respon atau mitigasi risiko sehingga hal ini ditangkap sebagai berita negatif (<em>bad news</em>) oleh investor. Disisi lain <em>corporate social responsibility </em>dan kepemilikan institusional menunjukkan hasil positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.  Hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi suatu kajian bagi pihak manajemen untuk lebih memberi perhatian tentang bagaimana perusahaan memitigasi risikonya sehingga memberikan sinyal positif bagi investor. Selain itu penting bagi perusahaan untuk tetap menjaga tingkat keluasan pengungkapan CSR di laporan tahunan dan efektivitas pengawasan kinerja perusahaan oleh pihak institusi sehingga meningkatkan nilai perusahaan</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci:</strong> manajemen risiko , tanggung jawab sosial, kepemilikan institusional, nilai perusahaan.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 468
Author(s):  
Patrisia Adiputri Singal ◽  
I Nym Wijana Asmara Putra

One of the factors of corporate governance that influence the implementation of CSR is the ownership structure. The emergence of corporate ownership structures results from a comparison of the number of shareholders in the company. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and foreign ownership on disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This research was conducted on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2013-2017. The sample of this research was 40 Infrastructure, Utilities and Transportation companies using purposive random sampling, where samples were taken based on certain criteria. Data collection of this study uses secondary data. The analysis technique used is the Analysis of Multiple Linear Regression. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership and managerial ownership have a positive effect on CSR, while foreign ownership has no significant negative effect on disclosure of CSR. Keywords : Institutional Ownership; Managerial Ownership; Foreign Ownership; Disclosure Of Corporate Social Responsibility.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 487-503
Author(s):  
Shabran Jamil ◽  
Erinos NR ◽  
Mayar Afriyenti

This study aims to find empirical evidence regarding the relationship between institutional ownership and company value which is moderated by corporate social responsibility (CSR). The population in this study were 48 property and real estate companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2015-2017, with the number of samples used was 35 companies. The data used is secondary data in the form of annual reports obtained from the IDX website (www.idx.co.id). The testing in this study was conducted with moderated regression analysis (MRA). The results show that institutional ownership has no effect on corporate value and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has not been able to moderate the moderation between institutional ownership and firm value.


Author(s):  
Fia Fauzia Burhanuddin ◽  
Gagaring Pagalung ◽  
R.A Damayanti

We try to explain the role of enterprise risk management as a moderation in increasing firm value (empirical study on manufacturing companies that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period of 2016-2018. in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) during the period 2016 to 2018. Samples using the purposive sampling method, there are 14 companies as samples.The analytical tool used is multiple linear regression analysis with Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) which aims to analyze the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR), managerial ownership, independent commissioners and audit committees on firm value with enterprise risk management as a moderating variable using SPSS v.22 software The results of the study show evidence that: (1) Corporate social responsibility sponsibility has a positive and significant effect on firm value. (2) Managerial ownership has a positive and significant effect on firm value. (3) Independent commissioners have a positive and significant effect on company value. (4) The audit committee has a positive and significant effect on the value of the company. (5) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate value. (6) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of managerial ownership on firm value. (7) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of independent commissioners on company value. (8) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of the audit committee on the company's value.


Author(s):  
Dmytro Baiura ◽  

The formation of the ESG strategy of corporate-type enterprises depends on the adequate direction of development of corporate social responsibility chosen by enterprises. Global Sustainable Development Goals are the criteria for selecting the most important segments of companies' impact on environmental and social development. At the same time, an adequate system of corporate governance, including corporate controlling, is needed to implement both the strategy and key tasks. First, it is the integration into the organizational and managerial corporate structure of institutional support mechanisms. Second, it integrates the provisions of the ESG strategy into the overall corporate strategy. And of course, the integration of key provisions of the ESG strategy in the operational, investment and financial spheres of operation of enterprises, regardless of their economic activities and organizational and legal forms. The implementation of the provisions of the ESG strategy involves interaction with key stakeholders, or as it is considered stakeholders or groups influencing the company. It is important that each company clearly identifies them, identifies the strength of influence, key interests and features of social corporate communications with key stakeholders. In world practice, there are a number of methodological approaches, methods of identifying stakeholders and determining their impact on the company. The algorithm for developing the ESG strategy is practically no different from others and includes the following stages: diagnosing the state of the company in the field of sustainable development (social responsibility, corporate social responsibility); development of new provisions in the field of sustainable development; implementation of strategic plans for the implementation of sustainable development goals. During the implementation of the ESG strategy, special attention should be paid to corporate risk management. Currently, the most widespread in the world for enterprise risk management is the model COSO ERM (Enterprise Risk Management - enterprise risk management).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document