scholarly journals La caída de las cajas de ahorros españolas. Cuestión de rentabilidad, tamaño y estructura de propiedad

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Salvador Climent Serrano

In Spain between 2010 and 2011 there has been a major financial restructuring, which has led to the virtual disappearance of savings banks through mergers and subsequent change in ownership structure becoming banks. This major restructuring has been promoted by the Bank of Spain, as an outlet for that financial institutions subsisted to the crisis that affected them.This paper analyzes the banks and savings banks the Spanish financial system during the four years prior to the beginning given the financial restructuring of 2010. The aim is to check whether there are differences in profitability for reasons of size and form of ownership of the entity (savings banks, banks). The results show that the increase in size and bankarization under the auspices by the Bank of Spain is an appropriate strategy for resolving the current financial crisis.

UDA AKADEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 4-19
Author(s):  
Carlos Cordero-Díaz

La crisis que comprometió al sistema financiero ecuatoriano a fines del siglo XX es de las más fuertes que ha enfrentado nuestro país, comparable, en cuanto a sus implicaciones macroeconómicas y reformas económicas, con la que se desarrolló en los años veinte del siglo pasado; pero más devastadora en términos de los efectos sociales que tuvo. Los testimonios de personas que perdieron sus recursos económicos, primero en el feriado bancario y luego con la liquidación de varios bancos e instituciones financieras, demuestran la magnitud de la crisis.La culminación de la crisis financiera coincide con el cambio del régimen monetario en nuestro país, cambio que también provocó pérdidas a ciudadanos y empresas, ya que el elevado tipo de cambio utilizado, provocó una significativa reducción en el valor de los ahorros. La participación del Estado ecuatoriano en el surgimiento, desarrollo y culminación de la crisis financiera fue sin duda determinante. La nueva normativa para la regulación bancaria y financiera dictada a inicios de los años noventa fue uno de los factores explicativos del origen; la entrega de recursos a las instituciones financieras, a través del Banco Central y a los depositantes a través de la AGD, permitieron que la crisis el sistema financiero se trasladara al ámbito monetario.El Ecuador inauguró el nuevo siglo con un nuevo régimen monetario y sintiendo también las repercusiones de la las crisis financiera.Palabras claves: crisis financiera, dolarización, banco central, macroeoconomíaAbstractThe crisis which compromised the Ecuadorian financial system in the late twentieth century is the strongest our country has faced, comparable in terms of its macroeconomic implications and economic reforms, with the one developed in the twenties of the last century; however, more devastating in terms of its social impact. The testimonies of people who lost their economic resources first during the bank holiday; and then, with the liquidation of several banks and financial institutions, demonstrate the magnitude of the crisis. The culmination of the financial crisis coincides with the change of the monetary regime in our country; change that also caused losses to citizens and businesses, since the high exchange rate caused a significant reduction in savings value.The participation of the Ecuadorian State in the emergence, development and culmination of the financial crisis was certainly crucial. The new rules for the banking and financial regulation enacted in the early nineties was one of the explanatory factors of the origin. The provision of resources to financial institutions by the Central Bank, and to depositors through the AGD (Deposit Guarantee Agency), enabled the crisis of the financial system to move to the monetary field.Ecuador inaugurated the new century with a new monetary system; but at the same time feeling the impact of the financial crisis. Keywords: Financial Crisis, Dollarization, Central Bank, Macro Economy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 541-564
Author(s):  
Roberto Chacon de Albuquerque

Facing an international financial crisis that could lead its own financial system to the brink of collapse, the German government needed to show political will in order to save financial institutions in risky situations. This article analyzes the legal strategies used to rescue the financial system, including the statization of banking institutions as an ultima ratio. Prior to the bank statization established by the Rescue Takeover Act, the Financial Market Stabilization Act foresaw an increase in the capital of financial institutions by means of state control without statization. This last act, nonetheless, has not been considered enough to avoid the collapse of a banking institution that is relevant for the whole financial system such as Hypo Real Estate (HRE).


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-79
Author(s):  
V. M. Usoskin

Over the past three decades, a large group of non-bank financial institutions has been formed in the world economy. These institutions fall outside the realm of traditional banking and take an active part in the lending processes of economic turnover entities. The activities of these institutions, called the shadow banking system (SBS), led to an increase in systemic risks and had a negative impact on the state of the global financial system. This was distinctly displayed during the global financial crisis of 2007–2009. The subject of this article is a series of measures taken by the international and national financial control bodies after the financial crisis to eliminate most risky aspects of shadow banking and to strengthen the system of financial oversight and monitoring. The final aim of the analysis is to evaluate effectiveness of the measures on strengthening control and limiting risks applied by the control bodies of the G-20 countries in the course of the reform to enterprises of the traditional and shadow sectors of the financial system. The results of the analysis show that the reform strengthened positions of traditional banks and improved their ability to resist financial shocks. As to the shadow banking sector, contrary to the statements of the initiators of the reform the regulative measures did not eliminate the systemic risks peculiar to nonbank financial institutions and did not stop their growing activities. This situation threatens the stability of the global financial system and a possibility of a new financial slump retains.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Hauser

AbstractThe zero risk weight privilege for European sovereign debt in the current capital adequacy requirements for credit institutions incentivises credit institutions to acquire and hold sovereign debt. However, it also poses a significant risk to the stability of the banking system and thus the financial system as a whole. It is argued that this privilege should not only be abolished due to the risk it entails but that it is also non conformant with EU primary law. Art. 124 TFEU prohibits privileged access of the EU and Member States' public sector to financial institutions except for prudential considerations. The protective purpose of Art. 124 TFEU to ensure sound budgetary policies by subjecting public borrowing to the same rules as borrowing by other market participants is thwarted by the uniform zero risk weight privilege. Further, as this privilege does not take into account the varying creditworthiness of the individual Member States it does not promote the soundness of financial institutions so as to strengthen the soundness of the financial system as whole, but rather endangers systemic stability. The zero risk weight privilege is therefore not based on prudential considerations and hence violates Art. 124 TFEU.


Author(s):  
Harald Wixforth

AbstractThe current financial crisis has provoked keen discussion on how to analyze and compare similar types of crises, in order that we might be able to draw lessons from history. This article attempts to outline different instruments of comparison. It also tries to compare the German 1931 banking crisis to the current crisis, in order to highlight parallels and differences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-504
Author(s):  
Dara Z. Strolovitch

“Critical analyses of the global financial crisis of 2008 (GFC) have neglected the ways in which structural inequalities around gender and race factor into (and indeed make possible) the current economic order. Scandalous Economics breaks new ground by arguing that an explicitly gendered approach to the GFC and its ongoing effects can help us to understand both the root causes of the crisis and the failure to significantly reform financial institutions and macroeconomic models.” These words, from the blurb on the back cover of Scandalous Economics, nicely summarize the book’s topic and the general approach to it. Because the book contains contributions from a number of the top political scientists writing about the gendering of political economy, and because this topic is such an important one, we have invited a range of political scientists to comment on the book and on the broader theme of the gendering of political economy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document