Laminar-Turbulent Transition Modeling with a Reynolds Stress Model for Anisotropic Flow Characteristics

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunya Endo ◽  
Thanakorn Sujisakulvong ◽  
Yuichi Kuya ◽  
Taketo Ariki ◽  
Keisuke Sawada
2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 706-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong H. Im ◽  
Kang Y. Huh ◽  
Kwang-Yong Kim

Numerical simulation is performed for stagnating turbulent flows of impinging and countercurrent jets by the Reynolds stress model (RSM). Results are compared with those of the k−ε model and available data to assess the flow characteristics and turbulence models. Three variants of the RSM tested are those of Gibson and Launder (GL), Craft and Launder (GL-CL) and Speziale, Sarkar and Gatski (SSG). As is well known, the k−ε model significantly overestimates turbulent kinetic energy near the wall. Although the RSM is superior to the k−ε model, it shows considerable difference according to how the redistributive pressure-strain term is modeled. Results of the RSM for countercurrent jets are improved with the modified coefficients for the dissipation rate, Cε1 and Cε2, suggested by Champion and Libby. Anisotropic states of the stress near the stagnation region are assessed in terms of an anisotropy invariant map (AIM).


AIAA Journal ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Jiang Luo ◽  
Budugur Lakshminarayana

Author(s):  
David Roos Launchbury ◽  
Luca Mangani ◽  
Ernesto Casartelli ◽  
Francesco Del Citto

Abstract In the industrial simulation of flow phenomena, turbulence modeling is of prime importance. Due to their low computational cost, Reynolds-averaged methods (RANS) are predominantly used for this purpose. However, eddy viscosity RANS models are often unable to adequately capture important flow physics, specifically when strongly anisotropic turbulence and vortex structures are present. In such cases the more costly 7-equation Reynolds stress models often lead to significantly better results. Unfortunately, these models are not widely used in the industry. The reason for this is not mainly the increased computational cost, but the stability and convergence issues such models usually exhibit. In this paper we present a robust implementation of a Reynolds stress model that is solved in a coupled manner, increasing stability and convergence speed significantly compared to segregated implementations. In addition, the decoupling of the velocity and Reynolds stress fields is addressed for the coupled equation formulation. A special wall function is presented that conserves the anisotropic properties of the model near the walls on coarser meshes. The presented Reynolds stress model is validated on a series of semi-academic test cases and then applied to two industrially relevant situations, namely the tip vortex of a NACA0012 profile and the Aachen Radiver radial compressor case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document